or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Crowley

You misunderstand.  The allegation is that Apple drastically changed the terms shortly before GTAT signed, but by that point GTAT had sunk a lot of resources and planning into the Apple contract, so had no real negotiating position, which Apple exploited. Is there evidence that GTAT's business had "tanked" prior to signing the contract? Huh?  A history of what?
The argument as I read it was that GTAT entered into negotiations with Apple in good faith, put lots of time and effort into those negotiations, passing up other potential business deals, and were then subject to something of a bait-and-switch by Apple, where they pulled a Darth Vader and changed most aspects of the deal.  At that point GTAT were faced with a choice between a difficult, but still potentially lucrative arrangement, or no arrangement at all, months of work...
Someone feeling like their privilege isn't being respected enough?   Get over it.
Hah, I like this.
Does this mean Pay is subject to the same caps as other contact less payments (either £10 or £20 in the UK I think?). That kind of blows, I was hoping the extra security would get it past that.
How is it "the worst" of any world?Think before posting this nonsense pls.
I'll console myself with that next time I lose a race.
Running with a phone in my pocket? Hell no.
And the issue of consumers (and other economic agents) operating without perfect information, which all of this free market idealistic twaddle so frequently builds a straw house on the assumption of.
You're not getting it Marvin, the free market doesn't do that.  It just doesn't.  Like he said.  Not need for proof, it just doesn't.  Inconceivable!
New Posts  All Forums: