New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by airmanchairman

Quote: Originally Posted by cnocbui  I'm probably the only person who thinks this, but I don't want to control devices by talking to them and would find it a purchase impediment if it were a ubiquitous...
Quote: Originally Posted by Cash907  Oh come off it, J rag. That was funny for anyone that doesn't have a chip on their shoulder or a stick up their keister. Supreme humour comes from being willing and able to make fun...
Quote: Originally Posted by anantksundaram  I don't know if they're 'naive' or not, but according to the WSJ article, $700M+..... an amount that would, as marginal trades, be more than sufficient to roil the daily...
I for one appreciate a third, possibly more independent analysis of an app to help decide if it's worth downloading.   Developers are not generally renowned for descriptive powers of any degree, and have often been seen to...
Quote: Originally Posted by matrix07  hmm.. why judge the store on its growth (percentage)? Isn't revenue is a better judgement? Also I don't think Apple will have lower mindshare just because it has 20% of the market...
Quote: Originally Posted by Parsec  So an article about Google Maps returning to iOS is a thinly veiled excuse to demonstrate how brilliant Apple Maps is. I'm really glad that Apple Maps doesn't render a pavement under...
Quote: Originally Posted by TBell  I also am one of the downloaders. After trying it out on two short trips while comparing Apple's App at the same time, but on a different phone, I decided the App needs work and I...
To the guy saying Apple Maps suck in the UK: Speak for yourself, mate. I live in one-horse-town Basingstoke, Hampshire and the Apple Maps' Satellite view of the area is absolutely brilliant, after a decidedly ropey...
Way to go, DED! What's good for the gander is also good for the goose and vice versa. Some critics sure know how to dish it out but can't take it when the shoe's on the other foot. All in all, a warts-and-all objective first look at...
CoCCorrect me if I'm wrong, but isn't Mirror Worlds simply a Patent Troll that bought the IP rights off the professor years ago "in the expectation of plenty"?
New Posts  All Forums: