or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by kent909

Now that it is official, maybe soon the point of this will come out.
I suspect that all those high margin refrigerators subsidize the phones.
 Isn't this the function of the media? A few people gather the news and report it to the many. You know, what you said without the hostility.
Well actually I have no interest in reading Samsung's earnings report. If AI wants to reference something from it maybe they should include the quote, or change the headline to reflect what the article actually covers.
There are choices out there that allow a person avoid doing business with the likes of Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile along with all of their sub carriers. If people would just consider what their real cell phone needs are, then look around, many might discover they don't have to play their game. How many people who use a cell radio equipped device need unlimited data? I am on WiFi 95% of the time. Maybe if people didn't spend 85% of your waking life staring at a...
Just what the NSA needs.
So the headline says that Samsung blames competition. I did not see any quotes in the article of any Samsung employee saying that. Who at Samsung is blaming competition? Names? Dates? Quotes?
This should be quite the accomplishment, since there never will be an iWatch.
Interesting perspective. So if I was a cell phone company and I said I would charge you $1000 a month for the plan that you have you would be happy because you are saving $860 a month. The idea is, can you get your plan for less, not more.
My iPad is on the original unlimited plan with AT&T. Consumer Cellular uses the AT&T network.
New Posts  All Forums: