or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by kent909

My point is that if Apple does a wearable, I am sure it will be multifunctional.  One of those functions will be a clock and only because it will have timing functions and that requires clock capability. My car has a clock in it but it is called a car and not a clock. By choosing iWatch is just lazy and unimaginative. Or maybe easier to type than multifunctional wrist band.  
See my revised post.
Merriam Websters definintion:   watch:  a device that shows what time it is and that you wear on your wrist or carry in a pocket.   Based on this my iPhone is a watch.   Apple may make something that you wear on your wrist but it will not be called an iWatch.   People lets try a little harder on this.
There will never be a watch.
Now that it is official, maybe soon the point of this will come out.
I suspect that all those high margin refrigerators subsidize the phones.
 Isn't this the function of the media? A few people gather the news and report it to the many. You know, what you said without the hostility.
Well actually I have no interest in reading Samsung's earnings report. If AI wants to reference something from it maybe they should include the quote, or change the headline to reflect what the article actually covers.
There are choices out there that allow a person avoid doing business with the likes of Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile along with all of their sub carriers. If people would just consider what their real cell phone needs are, then look around, many might discover they don't have to play their game. How many people who use a cell radio equipped device need unlimited data? I am on WiFi 95% of the time. Maybe if people didn't spend 85% of your waking life staring at a...
Just what the NSA needs.
New Posts  All Forums: