or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by waldobushman

Neither Forbes nor Reuters ever knows what they're talking about. They are PR generators. 
This is not just a Surface problem (pun intended) -- it is a core problem. Windows 8 is awful, at least on the ASUS laptop I was playing with. Maybe it was the awful bundled software ASUS installed, but Windows 8 is just pitiful. Add that Windows 8 must include both keyboard, mouse, and touch interfaces, and a wide range of platform functionality, and be backwards compatible with previous Windows version makes this OS a platform only Dr Frankenstein could love.
But, 1M shares is a huge sell-off if done quickly, warping the price. Especially with robotic trading, a huge drop in price orchestrated by hedge funds would mean that those trying to sell for more would be able to only if they would meet the lowered prices. It's a mob psychology, "run on the bank" activity, not rational -- likely also the explanation for Apple's price being driven up so quickly. Investors sell/buy based on technical considerations not based on evaluation...
No. Revenue is not Gross Revenue. And no, Profit is not Revenue - Expenses. There are all these pesky lines with different names measuring different things. Gross Margin, Net Taxes, Deferred Revenue, Prepaid Expenses, etc. Timing is everything. Accounting practices and laws determine when and how all this stuff is recognized and reported. 
Of course, the amounts paid to developers are not Revenue, they are Expenses. Duh.
What would happen if we banned analysts altogether. They don't do or know anything useful. Never have. The problem is gambling. The price of stocks have nothing to do with a company's fundamentals. The solution is investors have to hold stock for one year at least, they cannot take losses nor get capital gains favoritism. Then companies can at least plan one year out and not quarterly. Perhaps, we should simply ban quarterly reports and only allow reporting annually....
AAPL came in 2.5B over their estimate. That is not a miss. Analysts are always wrong.
If rumors are correct, Tim Cook, unlike SJ, is openly more concerned with stock price. Of course, after SJ's passing, Apple stock went into orbit, so SJ was not tested in that new environment. Tim Cook certainly must be concerned with the recent stock decline. My concern with Apple continues to be the paucity of innovative minds at the top of Apple. SJ Ive Forstall were key players. Forstall self-destructed, SJ gone. Can Ive do it alone? Not likely. He's significantly...
I wouldn't put bets on NFC. There are different versions and each takes substantial investments for retailers to implement. And it requires it's own antenna. Low power bluetooth, however, is already here and in most devices. With cameras and QR, NFC is not needed.
How desperate can he be? He had hidden hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of goodies. Imagine if he had sold any of them, then he would not have been desperate, right? Seems his only skill was stealing stuff. He wasn't smart enough to figure out how to convert stuff into money.
New Posts  All Forums: