or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by dasanman69

Vagrancy laws
In the results.
I disagree. I believe that the Apple Watch was meant for a large amount of iPhone owners to buy which is why Apple
No it's not. The majority of the people in the world cannot afford an iPhone, and many others have zero use for it.
Yet they never ask ExxonMobil "you gave us gasoline, now what?"
So now one has to beat earnings in dramatic fashion every single time? What will they think of next?
The carriers were forced by the government to allow the MVNOs onto their networks. They wouldn't have a choice but allow Apple resell their service had they chosen to.
The initial split was 60/40 but they switched to 70/30 in 2012, so apologies if I don't buy that they weren't focusing on ad revenue.
It's affecting a boat load of iPhone users.
New Posts  All Forums: