or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by dasanman69

As far as the picture goes it's not crappy.
Twenty one sixty doesn't sound as nice as ten eighty.
There's nothing wrong with a MFN clause, but it then put the publishers in a conundrum with Amazon in which they had to then collectively bargain to change the current business terms. That's what got them in trouble, and unfortunately dragged Apple into it.
There's nothing wrong with the agency model. It's the most favored nation clause that was the issue.
I agree that the agreements between Apple, and the publishers were legal, yet the court nullified them.
What's worse is that it cannot be turned off on the Nexus 6.
Because now they'll only wire up areas that will be profitable. Not many companies are willing to wait decades to see a return on their investment.
There's a court decision that states otherwise.
Are you 2 still at it? This is turning into a Hatfield/McCoy type feud.
I think Apple went about doing the right thing in the wrong way. Ultimately it will be a good, and prosperous thing for all involved.
New Posts  All Forums: