or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by PhilBoogie

Hmm, I'm late to get back to this thread I see. Of all the things said I think many are spot on, that is, sorry to say, disagree with @nht. While you make solid points they are also rebutted by the @Lorin Schultz and others. This one from @Benjamin Frost stood out for me (amongst others):I once took the Apple FCPX workshop and was told that the most important aspect of making film is to have good sound. Sounded spot on, and I fully agree with that statement. Be it OT...
As great as these links are, they also show its meaningless: most require the delvers over the Internet, needing 15-20Mib/s is far exceeds the average of 3.8Mib/s:http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Internet_connection_speedsThen there's the content, or lack of. Shooting in 4K isn't exactly the golden standard, it's picking up. So what do they do? They scan original film negatives, which is a good thing. But renting it for $7.99 or buying for $29.99...I...
You're putting it correct, "as an aside", since this is the opposite of what need to be happening: delivery of 4K. Once we have that the TV's will follow their way to the store themselves. As good as it is to see these prices drop I'll be on my third set before I get that signal into my home.
Windows? I look out of windows. If God wished us to use Windows, he would allow us to come back from the dead...frequently. NEVER approach a PC thinking "This will only take 5 minutes". Windows users often swear at their PC's, whereas Mac users always swear by their Macs. In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? - Sun Microsystems
QFT. This cannot be repeated enough. There may be many videos available on YouTube in 4K or even 5K, the carriers are simply not going to deliver this massive data to your home, period. My country only has, I don't know, something like 8 channels in 1080 and 30+ in lower res. Get a premium account and you'll get many more channels in HD, but forget about anything higher. Ok, small country here, so YMMV, but we're a long way off from 4K. I don't even think the next...
Indeed, that would be very unlikely. Not just for your reasoning, but also the tech: the reason sports watches are so thick is because they have a gps chip inside (and not much more, certainly not on the level the watch from Apple has)Never mind these watches usually burn out after 4 to 8 hour use. Nah, I think it'll take quite some time for the tech to catch up and have the Apple Watch do what we want it to do (and without the need for an iPhone)The ability to store music...
Perhaps, but the 1st gen seems to require an iPhone, if for nothing else than to install apps on the watch:http://9to5mac%2ecom/2014/09/30/apple-watch-app-store-iphone-app/Fantastic article linked there:http://www.ablogtowatch.com/apple-watch-hands-on-review/In depth review with hi-res photos, not renders:
Thanks for the dimensions: I must admit that I simply looked at the screen size and the picture. So good o you to point this out.Please, do post here once you've used it for a few days. I'm also interested in the things we don;t normally get to see: packaging, any accessories, a special website for this new product, stuff like that. (if it's not too much copy-paste trouble; sometimes these things take up a vast amount of time)That's quite a statement; now you really have...
Kind of you not to have taken it as a jerkish comment. I was trying to see if others would refute it, but you fortunately know how this stuff works. Boy am I glad to finally see someone understanding the difference in TV & computer pixels. This is so often overlooked/ignored... I think once even had it in my sig.It is my understanding that at some point they settled on a standard and left 525 behind. The path taken to come to this standard? I don't know. I can't find...
I think that is the most disrespectful thing to do, wear an earpiece when someone is talking to you. A notification on your phone or watch can simply be ignored. Heck, even emphasize your undevided attention to the other person. Wearing a whispering earpiece does just the opposite.
New Posts  All Forums: