or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by AaronJ

 So, you're starting with a question.  Interesting.  Do you know what that tells investigators?
 Yeah.  Just left in a box for too long.  If I had kept up with it, I'm sure it would still be working. Oh, well. :)
 Totally OT, but I was looking at my original iPhone last night, actually, and I was thinking what a great piece of technology it is.  Granted, it doesn't turn on anymore, but damn, I loved that thing.
 No offense, but you're on crack. And I'd love to see you say that Angela Ahrendts in person.
 Well, considering that a Clash: London Calling tee once led to quite a fun -- if short -- relationship of types for me, I won't speak with disdain about band t-shirts. :)
 Eh.  Microsoft's problem in the devices arena is pretty much that they were so late into the game.  It almost doesn't matter whether it's a good platform or not at this point.  They entered an arena that was already established.  The only way to be successful doing that is to come out with something revolutionary (a la Apple entering the phone arena with the iPhone).  Microsoft's never going to do that, and thus the devices are never going to be a big part of their...
 Mother of god.  *eek*
 There's a big difference, though. Samsung, for example, is a vast conglomerate making primarily commodity items, be they smartphones, TVs, washing machines, or what have you.  Then, of course, they also make a great deal of components for all sorts of companies, from Apple to everyone else, in screens, chips, and the like. Apple has always -- well, let's forget about the time that Jobs was gone for now -- been a company that, yes, was interested in profits.  But they were...
 Well, to be fair, Tom Brady does rule. :)  Yeah, and it will be many of the same people who were talking about how the iPhone (and later the iPad) would be total failures/spell Apple's doom/etc.
 You sound quite confused by the the purpose of both editorials and this site.
New Posts  All Forums: