or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by jmgregory1

Seems to be Samsung attorneys are using a classic form of negotiation - when things aren't going your way, deflect attacks by changiing the subject.  I have a feeling the judge isn't going to like this very much as I'm not seeing how they can relate this back to the case at hand.
iPad mini seems to be a natural outgrowth for an iOS device.  Just like the iPod was offered in a variety of sizes and styles, it would make perfect sense to do the same thing with iOS devices - iPod touch, iPhone, iPad mini, iPad.   I know this isn't what the conversation is about, but Apple has such a tight consumer base, compared to any Android offering, that there is a very good chance that Apple can simply take the majority share of market in the iPad market,...
Wait, I'm not so sure you're talking value adding anything in your points.  Amoled vs lcd - it's different sides of the same coin.  They're both screens.  Is this what the lawsuit is about? Size is not a value either, given it's purely subjective.  I'm 6' 3", does that make me better than you are at 5' 11"?  Is this what the lawsuit is about?   User replaceable batteries?  And what pray tell value does that bring?  Sounds to me more like an excuse for not making the...
What Moto/Google is trying to do is a scam.  I would argue that if they're trying to collect from Apple, after already collecting from Qualcomm, then they might as well ask the judge to rule that every consumer using an iPhone should have to pay too.  Why stop at triple dipping - make every retailer, distributor, etc pay too.  It's only fair right?
I agree with this wholeheartedly. I don't want to have to wade through tons of crap, just to get to the good stuff.  Best Buy is full of high profit (for them) crap that no one is buying and a large amount of low profit product that not enough people are buying.  That's just a recipe for death of a retailer.  After all these years they're still selling ungodly high priced hdmi cables because why?  Because they use them as an add-on when selling a new tv, as the cable...
It's a tough business to be in - advertising, that is.  We can all complain that these ads were not Apple's finest, yet we don't know what Apple actually hoped to achieve with the ads.  Heck, I've been using Macs since the late 80's and think of myself as being pretty fluent in both Mac and PC software and hardware.  But I too find myself flustered with doing things like making a video.  iMovie, once you figure out what you're doing with it, IS a very easy to use program...
No, my dream was the inspiration for the detailed drawings I created, albeit in pencil, that clearly show a tablet very similar to what became the iPad. Therefor I do indeed have prior art for the design and even some functionality on the os given my notes about the symbols onscreen and video playback capability.I'm feeling pretty secure about this now and look forward to my day in front of the judge. Apple is going to look so bad.
I had this dream, I was sitting at my desk at work, which happened to be a company that manufactured cheap plastic craft and photo products, back when I worked there in the late 80's and as usual, I was tired of dealing with the boring number crunching I had to do for Wal-Mart, my largest customer, on the plastic canvas we sold them.  This was back in the day when computers were still a thing that not everyone had and the ones we were using were horrible, at best, green...
+1.  What an idiotic statement to make.  So, yes, Apple copied MS.  But because Apple has the ability to time travel, they can take the ideas from companies like MS today and go back in time, write a patent application and then be credited for something they didn't create.  And of course they didn't actually create the time machine, but just stole the idea from some other company (probably Samsung) in the future and we just don't realize that's the case now.   Stupid...
The issue of whether Samsung created and manufactures components (and patents many of the same) isn't the issue being challenged here.  Apple works with Samsung and buys a boat-load of parts from them.  The issue is that, Apple goes to Samsung to buy parts for a new product.  Samsung is privy to the design because they have build parts based upon design specs.  Then for some reason, pure coincidence of course, Samsung changes their design for smartphones to look very much...
New Posts  All Forums: