Funny how they touted resolution over screen area for so long, then turned around just for their Nexus 7 comparison and touted the Minis screen area. They're having it both ways, and most people will take what they said in stride.
Quote:Originally Posted by SolipsismX 1) You have proof that once the ODD and HDD is removed there will be no room for an dGPU?
2) You have proof that an iGPU can effectively run a 13" RMBP display and that being able to run that 4x...
Intel has a quad core mobile Ivy Bridge processor with the same TDP as the MBP 13 uses, I hope the Retina version gets that.
Also the concern about Intel-only graphics is valid, on the 15" there is a very jarring lag with some UI...
Quote:Originally Posted by BulletSpongeRTR http://www.techpowerup.com/158480/AMD-Demonstrates-Trinity-APU-Its-Own-Thunderbolt-Alternative.html
Thunderbolt alternative, which isn't really Thunderbolt at all.
Quote:Originally Posted by Gazoobee This should probably read:
"... tests have shown that almost any ARM based chip, even non customised versions, are significantly faster and more efficient than any Atom chip yet made."
would be...
Lots of things make me doubt this happening in the next decade. The investment it would take to build a high performance chip like Intels would make the A6 seem tiny, desktop and laptop chips are still over an order of magnitude ahead of...
Didn't the old connectors start using chips like these too? Really the only question is, is it the same chip? I remember they started doing that and old cables wouldn't work with new iPods then.