Posts by shadash

Quote: Originally Posted by iLiver http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/03/te...h/03pogue.html Game over. You can all now bow and genuflect to the poster(s) over the last 3 1/2 years who have been banned and called trolls for stating that...

Quote: Originally Posted by noexpectations So, if you have good AT&T coverage, it's a no brainer. But if you don't, it's a no brainer too.

Quote: Originally Posted by Rot'nApple Wall Street Journal's Walt Mossberg... hmm, Wall Street... where is that? New York? Who does he call? Some guy where? San Francisco?! Tech Crunch... "But for whatever reason, in major...

Quote: Originally Posted by alkrantz Except that I can. But if you can't then that is a dealbreaker for those people. Make sense?

Quote: Originally Posted by alkrantz I guess I still don't understand why not being able to use the web while on the phone isn't a deal breaker. I'm the only person who does that apparently. If you can't make a call in the first place...

deleted - I was wrong

Quote: Originally Posted by sciwiz Sorry to burst your bubble, DED. The numbers are already in the Canalyis report, if you read it carefully. Check the text of the report. http://www.canalys.com/pr/2011/r2011013.html Also, see...

Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta Look up 'ad hominem attack'. Since you're unable to intelligently discuss the issue, you just attack the person. And, no I don't work for AT&T or any telecom. I don't work in anything even...

Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta I hope AT&T sues these people for making false accusations and libel. Do you work for AT&T? Or to put it another way, have you seen Dwight on the Office? I think you two were separated at...

The 5 million figure seems too low.