Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX
They could even start a paid program for developers that would get Google to certify apps as being malware free and doing what they claim to do that could be sold in the same store as Google Play...
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone
Once you release something as open source (Apache 2 and GPLv2) you can't just take it private. It is not like a public company taken private by buying up all the shares.
Android is in the wild, cat...
I think Google's approach must change! I think the options for Android are:
1. Have an OS that provides core functionality and is open to everyone to use. But have your own Google flavoured version. This is similar to the WebKIT...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smiles77
... bought a 64GB 3G iPad 2 on Sunday for $450 and sold it today for $590...
I did not know the price of the older iPads are on the rise?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ireland
Not bad considering I told mine for 350 two weeks ago.
Lucky you! My sister tried selling hers and could not do it! Unlucky!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorguy
I've also never disagreed that Motorola should never have started the legal action over that set of patents in the first place. It may not be illegal but it's certainly against the spirit of FRAND....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sacto Joe
And yet, he appears to be agreeing with you (and Mr. Mueller) in his last post to me.
He is kind of agreeing for the wrong reasons and I intend to make him agree with me for the right reasons!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorguy
I haven't seen any claim on what portion of the pool came from Motorola.
As for "double-dipping", Qualcomm claims they had a license to Motorola's patents in the pool, and they extended...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sacto Joe
Fine, but what percentage of the pool does Moto represent, and why is it "double-dipping"? Or is it going to apply that percentage to all who license?
GG is trying to bend words and...