New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Galbi

Quote: Originally Posted by Quadra 610    You don't need to be a judge to recognize absurdity.  Then what is the point of having courts or third party independant parties? 
Quote: Originally Posted by AdamC  Time to give it a rest.   Everyone thinks he or she is right.   Online life isn't real life, get a life and go out and smell the roses and enjoy the...
Quote: Originally Posted by Rayz    Apple was never required to state that the product 'does not copy' and was never required to apologise. Apple was told to display the judgement on its website; it was...
Quote: Originally Posted by canucklehead  First, this is the most ridiculous ruling I've ever heard of.   Second, I would love for Apple to include images demonstrating how Samsung "didn't" copy...
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil    No, it hasn't. You seem to like pickles, so let's go back to that broken analogy.   Dad tells his kid he doesn't like pickles. Dad asks kid to go...
Quote: Originally Posted by charlituna  The Judge included rules in his order for those issues, which Apple followed. IF he wanted Apple to follow some generally accepted 'style book' for such things he should have...
Hahahahahahahahahah   Apple is just eating their own words.    That is what you get for making snarky obviously sarcastic statements. 
Quote: Originally Posted by Cpsro  with the R&D and manufacturing paid for by Apple, thank you.   If Apple was so great, why dont they make it themselves? 
Quote: It's not contempt of court. Apple has followed every instructions to the tee.   I was right. It was contempt of court. lol  
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil    What's beyond absurd is that trolls who say this think they can ever be taken seriously by anyone.   How about focusing on the topic at hand and not...
New Posts  All Forums: