or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by geoffrobinson

Sounds like the Office cash cow doesn't want to lose business and their near-monopoly to support the Mobile group. In that respect, this is quite wise.
At least according to what I read, New Coke tested better than both Coke Classic and Pepsi.
And the opposite. 
 Segregation was state-enforced. Jim Crow was state-mandated discrimination. A free society which forces people to do stuff is oxymoronic. That's like saying we're a free society, that's why we won't allow anybody to say anything mean to anyone else. Do understand that freedom means tolerating things you don't like?
Your last comment is contradictory. A free society would mean freedom for both parties. Freedom to turn people away and freedom not to buy.
Should a black photographer have to photograph a Klan rally? The language of the bill seemed overly broad based on news reports, but this is the essential problem. Forcing a baker to make a cake for a gay wedding is different than saying refusing service to someone because they are gay, I.e. A birthday cake or something not celebrating their gayness.
They could just as easily be a foreign country with an U.S. subsidiary. How does the U.S. help them overseas?   Frankly, I don't see how corporate taxes do much good. They just raise the costs for the business and get passed along to the consumers in some form or another.
Companies don't pay taxes. They either pass along the costs, pay their employees less, or have less money for the stockholders (think pension funds, not just institutional investors).
Please don't confuse bribes with extortion payments.
Would they prefer Apple to incorporate overseas?
New Posts  All Forums: