or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by diddy

No, creating derivative works (which is what hackintoshing is) is still not allowed and has nothing to do with this case.
I would say that AP is a reliable enough source...ETA: Apple Link. http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010...statement.html
Unless they make a specific advertising claim, you cannot sue them. Patents just cover processes, not physical shipped products. Of course if you are joking, carry on then!
Wasn’t IOS 4.0 for the Touch free long after previous upgrades (like 3.0) were paid? I thought that was one of the things that benefited from the new accounting rules was that Apple no longer had to account things on monthly payment regarding upgrades or whatever.
It’s a good thing Apple never said those words then.
Thanks. Now KNEEL Before me!
As it stands though, just stating something on the internet is practically useless. If it had any meaning I could demand you bow to me since I am the king of Siam. Of course none of that matters without something to back it up. Making assertions on the internet is useless when you can make up whatever you want.
Not quite:MS at best owns 50 percent of MSNBC.com. They are partners with NBC.
How do you know that the fault was in your phone. There are tons of variables involved.
Even if it dd happen, Apple wasn't lying anyway. Their press release said nothing about returning your phone to Best Buy. But you make a valid point - anybody can lie in a forum post. Especially when it involves individual experiences that cannot be verified. Heck, I could claim to be the King of Siam. But I am not...
New Posts  All Forums: