or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Suddenly Newton

My interpretation of the article's wording is: A known flaw was not patched until Google released a proof of concept attack, and this prompted Adobe into action.
Is it just a language barrier or is their patent system just hard to search?
As soon as Apple acquired it, Siri became the focus of many Apple-hater attacks. Nothing polarizes the tech elite like the adjective "Apple's".
Amazon wants to be a publisher: they already have the capability to print paper books and they control a popular eBooks platform. Authors would just be trading one middleman for another.
It is. Chrome is the official browser of AppleInsider and Huddler Lifestyle. Safari users were left to rot.
Why would the government sue Google over this? That would violate the policy of It's Only Wrong When Apple Does It. Besides, Google says they Do No Evil, so there. The guilty party has been punished, the government earn their cut of protection money, and Google is not evil. And parents everywhere are off the hook.
Wait...Adobe waited until now to patch the known flaw? Where are the howls of forum outrage and vitriol that we saw when Apple delayed patching a vulnerability on Macs by a few days? Not a peep outta these people.
I made that up. An observation from the way people handle rumors/hearsay on these forums.
 Who says USPTO won't accept drunken submissions scrawled on bar napkins?
 5. Forum trolls post "Apple should innovate, not litigate."
New Posts  All Forums: