or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by sammi jo

Political Outsider used to be fun and lively. The slide to "weblivion" accelerated when that Miscellaneous News "thread" hijacked the forum. It's impractical and cumbersome to have a meaningful discussion when so many "miscellaneous" topics are randomly multiplexed into a single thread with hundreds of discrete topics and thousands of posts. I would suggest to the global moderator that the "thread" be locked, as of now. 
 Is this a complaint or an observation?
Evidence please? Despite Osama bin Laden's known and stated opposition to the US on account of (US) troops being based in the "cradle of Islam", there are a number of inconsistencies as regards his alleged involvement in 9/11: For starters, there are statements allegedly from OBL that are in total opposition: We have all heard of the ones in which he allegedly admitted playing a part - broadcast ad nauseam in the media in the immediate wake of the attacks. But what we...
To the original question - no, regardless of what he's done. Two provably impeachable acts have been (1) serial violations of his oath of office, and (2) perjury - in that he knew full well that he was going to break that oath, either by choice or by being forced to, or both.   Where there's a will, there's a way, and in DC 2000s there is no real will. Regardless of team color - red or blue - both sides are working for the same promoter, just as in any other spectator...
 Earlier, you said: "It’s a descriptive term for someone who supposes a coverup has occurred" - ie conspiracy theorist.  However, since the 1963 assassination of JFK, the term "conspiracy theorist" has been broadly cultivated to imply, in mainstream understanding, that anyone who postulates an alternative to what is promoted officially, to be crazy, wacko or tinfoil hatter. In other words "conspiracy theorist” ≣ imply “tin foil hatter” or “wacko”.  And, as I said in a...
 A little more specific please?  What "garbage" are you referring to? 
 So, in your definition, the greater majority of the 9/11 Commissioners, including its two co-chairs, are worthy of being name called as "tin foil hatters" and "wacko conspiracy nuts"? Here is a sampling of what these Commissioners and panelists have said about their own "inquiry": *******(1) "The greater part of the Commission's findings "are untrue"...“The Commission's co-chairs said that the CIA the White House "obstructed our investigation". Indeed, they said that the...
 Looking up that phrase "preach peace when weak; preach war when strong" - only three references come up in a search engine: 1. ME Forum - Daniel Pipes. Pipes is a known Islamophobe who amongst a number of his cohorts in the pro-Israeli neoconservative movement, praised and sympathized with Norway terrorist Anders Breivik for his Oslo bombing outrage and the shooting rampage of 69 kids a few years back.  2. PJ Tatler - On its list of contributors is Michael Ledeen -...
 There is no HARD evidence with a verifiable chain of custody or certified time stamp, that *any* religious extremists successfully boarded those 4 airliners. No ticket purchase records, no cash or credit card transactions, no seat assignments with Arab names, no *verifiable* photographic or film/video evidence of any of the alleged 19 going through security on that morning at the two airports in question. Everything we were told about that was single sourced or hearsay....
As in "factually wrong" or "correct but morally wrong"? Discrimination against Muslims in the United States has a long history dating back to the early 1900s. Although successive Washington administrations flirted with Islamists overseas from the 1950s to the 1970s as a counterweight to communists and nationalists, Muslims within the US continued to be viewed with suspicion, which ramped up in 1972 when US President Richard Nixon inaugurated “Operation Boulder,” giving law...
New Posts  All Forums: