or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by hmm

They started a repair program.
There was a significant imac redesign around 2012, which included an updated screen treatment. It was more than just a thinner panel. TN doesn't have a lot of image persistence problems. It was actually a more common problem with earlier IPS panels. Do note that the imac uses the same panel, so thermal issues are similar.
Sure performance. I was referring to realized performance on the user end. The Core Ms are clearly aimed at lighter tasks. My words drifted a little off topic there, but I originally said that it needs to be judged on how well it runs the currently shipping versions within a certain class of software. How it compares to something from a few years ago that shipped with different software isn't as important. It's likely to be more demanding today. I just don't think most of...
I suspect the thunderbolt display doesn't move enough units to be a high priority. Apple never updated it to match the imac design, which I originally thought they would do 6-7 months after the redesigned imac rollouts. I don't see the cinema display on their site now, and it didn't come up in a store search for "cinema display". It may still show up in refurbished form.
 Ahem and one more As for Apple acquiring a foundry, it's a high level of risk, and they have no real expertise in that area. They have always pushed risk off onto their vendors.
The difference is often exaggerated when you're below an ideal amount of ram. If it has to frequently access a pagefile, the value of that disk speed becomes much more apparent.It's actually more than just the cpu package. Things such as the display have quite a bit of impact on battery life. Power management has to be aggressive in multiple areas to get close to that kind of battery life.
He probably anticipated it being gold plated.
 Their answers don't contain a lot of depth, but that isn't really the point. You have mentioned being against all taxes, and you stated "taxes are theft". It seems to contradict your claim that you could support a plan like that one.
 I don't see a lot of workloads that fall between this and the 15" mbp. Typically if you can leverage all available power, there's a pretty significant gap there. I see sluggishness due to ram and disk access far more than cpu bound problems when it comes to lighter tasks.
How would you pay for anything then including items that were part of its original charter? Printing more currency to do so would just be a stealth tax anyway, due to increased inflation. 
New Posts  All Forums: