or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Tallest Skil

 I’m sorry, do you actually believe this?
Except that isn’t even remotely close to being the case. They do. It has been. To the detriment of everyone else. Aww, that’s cute.  
 When you’re willing to actually respond to the argument, let us know. Read the brief on what they were discovered to be doing. Read the Fourth Amendment. It’s a pretty simple concept. Intent is meaningless, by the way. You may not have intended to knock down a water tower when your gun misfired, but you still broke the law. That’s mind-numbingly delusional nonsense and you know it, since you’re obviously intelligent enough to continue posting while explicitly avoiding...
     Gender roles, while often thought of as societal constructs, are more often biological pre-dispositions. The majority of men (approximately 15% deviance) have a natural interest in object-oriented tasks. The majority of women (again, approximately 15% deviance) have a natural interest in people-oriented tasks. Society didn't create gender roles–society merely grew accustomed to them. That's what society does–it grows accustomed to the way things are and holds it in...
As in the situation with EVERY OTHER governmental problem we face, the law already exists. It was on the books before all other laws. It’s just not being ENFORCED. That’s the problem. Laws existed to prevent ISPs from forming local monopolies. They weren’t enforced. So now handing the Internet to the FCC will fix things?Laws existed to prevent and deal with illegal immigration. They weren’t enforced. So now absolving the illegals of their crimes will fix things?  HERE’S...
That would be sexist, of course. Seems that some groups have their own words that only they can call each other.    You don’t even remotely begin to see. To take the metaphor to its logical extreme, I question whether you even have eyes. The Fourth Amendment invalidates your meaningless diatribe on what the powers of the branches of government are. What was your response? To continue to not actually answer or rebut anyone’s statements and just post the same thing again,...
Do women refer to each others’ ‘racks’ in that way?
 You see, the government has a set number of powers–things that they can legally do. These are written down explicitly in the Constitution. But the government has been increasing their number of powers without the consent of those they govern. They have also been ignoring the law and doing things they cannot legally do. That better? Can you give me a direct link? Thread’s moving pretty quickly.
 Because it isn’t an answer, as I literally just said. And he is, as shown by the law. It’s remarkable that you think anyone involved in this has that opinion, given that no one has stated as such.
New Posts  All Forums: