or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by MattBookAir

 That's what we Canadian's call: skating to where the puck was. Not good, Maynard.
So you would feel better if Apple gave up the revenue, and eliminated this option for those who find it preferable or more affordable. Got it.
By this logic, Apple should axe Safari ... which I'm sure is the biggest conduit for porn in Apple's ecosystem. But it was only ever a click bait article, right? I actually hope so.
Apple Watch 42mm with black leather loop order via the iOS App Store – which was operational before the on-line store. 4-6 Week delivery time.
I think this will be popular ... for many people weight is the big thing, and combine that with a killer display, and nice form factor, and this is a winner. The gold looks awesome, but probably a bit too flashy (for a guy). Will likely get space grey to match my 6+ and iPad (and stainless Apple Watch with black stainless arm band).   I'll likely keep my Retina 15" MBP, but hopefully the Core M is enough for most of what I do ... that's really the only question mark.
Prices are as expected. Thought I thought gold would be close to 5K. I'll probably just get the sport for the first gen, but would easily spent 1000 or so for stainless down the road ...
You are absolutely correct. I was (inaccurately) using the "go private" idea to express the fact that a $60 valuation would be approaching Apple's own cash on hand in the not too distant future which seems pretty absurd (compared to valuations of e.g. Amazon, in particular!).
yeah ... 3:1 would make it about right ... why the /s? 
This values them at less than about double the *cash* they have (I think ... doing the math in my head here).  Heck Apple could take themselves private in 5 years, if shares hit $60, even if revenue only stays constant :)
New Posts  All Forums: