or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by rp2011

Notice how round content (obviously) is more appropriate for the round shape and text information for the rectangle.So traditional analog faces, happy faces, planets, hula hoops etc all look better on a round device.But round is s a ridiculous shape for a text based information device.
Could it be the force touch is for the home button, replacing the mechanical components and replacing it with the non moving force touch implementation. To me it seams like the most practical implementation rather than the entire screen.
And laws would need to be changed to allow Apple to be able to sell the cars themselves. Current laws prohit car companies of selling cars directly to customers
The documentary on the doomed first GM electric car said when the car came to the dealer, the service on it was quite easy. No engine, no transmission, no catalytic converters, no radiator, no oil changes or oil filters. They simply checked the brakes, lubricated moving parts, checked batteries and pressure on the tires and done. Sounds like something perfect for a customer and margins minded Apple
Love Touch ID. That feature alone is reason to switch to iPhone
I love cars but I have always felt Apple should invest in satellite communications to be freed from cable and Internet constraints. It would open up many possibilities directly connected to their core strengths and established ecosystem.
Well I guess it  is subjective which is more "interesting". Our priorities change sometimes depending on the circumstances.
More interesting than saving lives and making a boatload of money doing so? When it comes to quality of life,  I don't think there is anything more interesting than something that could help. ...other than making a boatload of  money doing so rather
New Posts  All Forums: