The interesting piece to me is if they sold something they did not own. Not meaning the foolery of which subsidiary owned what. But was the Chinese subsidiary selling something even they did not own because they were legally bankrupt? It's the only argument that remotely makes sense for the creditors who lost a lot of $. Either way, a nuisance for Apple. They have 100 times the cash of the worst case scenario.
3/13/12 at 6:20pm