or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Bigc

It's no an IBM article, just published on their site...
hmm, which would be better; A dual processor dual core set-up or a single processor dual-core with cell attributes attached...DP dual core sounds a little redundant...
It all seems pretty straight forward to me. The days of big CPU speed increases are over. They may get 30% higher but the days of 5 fold increases are over. Therefore, in order to get anything more out of a computer box they have to make the computer do more things at once and better than they are doing now. So that would seem that the only way to go is more parallel. If Apple wants to stay in the game their going to have to go with the flow. As to smaller die sizes,...
Apple Refurb 1.8GHz 20" iMac $1699
You mean the way UNIX was designed and how it was used in the 70's at Berkeley...
Well if you make detailed digital maps of areas, a 30" is great. So, it depends on what you use your computer for...
Seems to me that 4 -processors have to cost more than 2 processors and a board to hold 4 processors has to cost more than a board that holds 2 processors, Therefore....
safe as milk...
...good one, like to see one of those.
Yeah, that's a good one, ought to get a prize or somethin'...
New Posts  All Forums: