or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Euphonious

  You're right - you didn't. It was Zither Zather Zuzz who implied that. Should have aimed my post at him - sorry about that.
  But why does that make jailbreaking wrong? It's the stealing of apps which is wrong, not the jailbreaking itself!    Jailbreaking is a morally neutral act. Saying that jailbreaking is wrong because it allows some people to steal apps is like saying that making knives is wrong, because some people use knives to stab people.
  I'm not sure about that. iOS is a very profitable platform. It's vastly more profitable than all competing mobile platforms, jailbreaking or no jailbreaking. If you're a mobile developer, ignoring iOS software is like signing your own death warrant.   Can you give me a single concrete example of a decent developer who shied away from developing on iOS because of jailbreaking?   You're also making the mistake of assuming that everybody jailbreaks to steal apps, which...
  I wouldn't exactly say that it's 'trolling'. It's expressing an opinion. Some people prefer more openness. Some people prefer less.   It's not 'trolling' where somebody expresses an opinion which contradicts yours.
  I largely agree. The problem is that most jailbreak software makes little effort to conform with Apple's UI standards and doesn't come close to the ease-of-use of Apple's UI. That's why I only use jailbreak tools which fit in with the base OS reasonably well.
  OK, you're gonna have to help me here. Who precisely ridicules 'jailbreaker types'? I'm keen to know, because this is the first time I've ever been ridiculed for being a 'jailbreaker type'. Why would you ridicule someone because they modified the software on a mobile phone? I just don't get it.    If I believed the world was flat, then that would be worthy of ridicule. But... jailbreaking a phone?! I promise you that 99.9% of the population doesn't give a damn whether...
  They're not in the App Store because Apple doesn't allow them in the App Store. They modify elements of the core UI or functionality and Apple doesn't allow that. I know that Apple has valid reasons for doing that, but personally I appreciate the flexibility more.
  That's mostly true. Android offers a much higher level of flexibility than even a jailbroken iPhone does - you can replace fundamentals of the OS, etc.    But Android doesn't interest me, because I don't like the core UI and design philosophy and I don't like the hardware. For me, jailbreaking an iPhone is a compromise - a way to achieve a bit more freedom whilst retaining the advantages of the iPhone over Android. You can't do everything, but you can improve on the...
I don't really mind Apple dictating the experience most of the time. It's that which keeps the UI consistent; some jailbreak software is really, really ugly!   But when it's a simple tweak with an obvious advantage and no real downside, then jailbreaking to achieve it is a bit of a no-brainer.
Yes. It aggravates me that the Apple method is so unintuitive, when Apple is normally a company known for its intuitive software design. It's five minutes' effort to jailbreak, repaid by better ease of use for years down the line.   Why the confrontational attitude to jailbreaking, anyway? It's my device, I paid good money for it; I'll use it how I want, whether it's Apple's wish or not.
New Posts  All Forums: