Posts by e_veritas

Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil  How odd. That's, like, so weird, right? I mean, my gawsh.   My comment was more of a "matter of fact" statement, and not meant to be confrontational. I take many of...

Quote: Originally Posted by Hellacool  You actually believe people are buying the SIII and do not want it?  that somehow the carriers can convince someone, with ease, to drop $249 on a phone? ...

Quote: Originally Posted by mostcallmerob    Please enlighten me what terminology you use as opposed to "fanboy."   Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil  None at all. It's...

Quote: Originally Posted by Loptimist    if what you say is really true,   then apple's patent is invalid because they patented a published prior art.   which Samsung and...

"Apple has made a clear showing that, in the absence of a preliminary injunction, it is likely to lose substantial market share in the smartphone market and to lose substantial downstream sales of future smartphone purchases and...

Quote: Originally Posted by GTR    They did and, apart from having a high resolution display, it was your typically plasticky, rubbish bit of phone from Samsung.   Techradar had the...

Apparently someone should have told Apple that they shouldn't be holding onto the bomb when going 'thermonuclear'....  

Quote: Originally Posted by wakefinance    Did you actually just quote a forum post as evidence?   Here let me try...

Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta  Let's see: http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php/1762879-Carriers-Looking-to-Lower-Phone-Subsidies/page2 "Carriers do not typically pay manufacturers for devices until the...

Quote: Originally Posted by Hiro    I don't think it (conspiracy) means what you think it means.    -I. Montoya   Hmmm...maybe you have another definition that I'm not aware...