Posts by e_veritas

It seems as though Apple just did the exact same thing that got them into this mess in the first place. In the words of the UK judge, this order was issued because of the following:   " In my judgment, Apple are carefully...

Quote: Originally Posted by tundraboy    That will be the day when a judge cites a plaintiff with contempt of court for quoting verbatim from the judge's own verdict.  The judge might as well cite...

Quote: Originally Posted by Rogifan  No doubt Apple's leagal team reviewed every single word of this before it was posted. I doubt they would allow Apple to post something that would get them in contempt of...

Quote: Originally Posted by jungmark  The judge didn't say they couldn't tack on additional commentary. The judge said Apple had to say Sammy didn't infringe and the site does say that.   Sounds good...

Quote: Originally Posted by Neo42  Looks like Apple failed to follow court order here   Agreed. This has contempt of court written all over it. 

What USPTO?!? Apple didn't invent easing functions for moving objects in graphical programming? Well....DUH!!!!

Quote: Originally Posted by Tulkas  It's actually completely true. Apple only made claimed in the counter suit. Samsung sued over the design first, in the UK. Specifically to have the design protection declared...

Quote: Originally Posted by Tulkas  You know that it was Samsung that initiated the frivolous lawsuit over design 'patents' right? That is not true. The issue of design patents were filed by Apple in their...

Quote: Originally Posted by BestKeptSecret  On another forum someone said that in the England, if you cannot prove your case and lose, you have to pay for wasting everybody's time (well, that is just putting it...

Seriously...an article about the dangers of clicking links in a "work-at-home" email is news?...only on AI. You would either have to be living without the internet for the last decade or a complete idiot to fall for that...