or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by MacTac

Perhaps I like the cleanliness and organization of having things internal. Why buy a nice looking Mac computer that Apple has spent lots of time making look nice and then attaching non matching third party drives to it? I like having two drives so I can back up data in case a drive dies. I have CD's and DVD's that are perfectly good to use in the home so why should I spend the time and energy ripping (which I still need a drive for anyway) when I can just use them with an...
CRT's have a slight curve to the glass. Makes a difference on how bad reflections are. Just like you can always tell fake glasses on shows and movies from the reflection off the flat glass. Real glasses have curved glass. Much less reflection. But I'm fine with the iMac having glossy screens. Because I don't like all in ones and won't buy one. What I want is a desktop between the mini and the Pro where I can use the monitor I already have.
Not just the screen. The complete lack of a mid sized, mid range desktop computer that does not have a built in screen. I do not like all in ones. Period. I'll never buy one. I do not want to lose features that I believe are very basic. Two internal hard drives and an optical drive. The only computer Apple makes that offers these very basic features is the $2499 Mac Pro. That's a high price to pay for basics. I don't want a computer bigger than my PowerMac G4. The Mac Pro...
No. But I sure as hell don't want a computer bigger than my old PowerMac G4. I just want an easy to get into Mac that has room for two hard drives and an optical drive where I can use the monitor I already have. It's crazy that in order to get something that simple you have to spend $2500.
Without a mid range monitor-less Mac I'm close to saying goodbye to Apple after 18 years. No amount of portable/mobile products will make me want a glossy screen all in one. Apple needs a new cube with more features than what you get on an iMac or mini.
Greenpeace doesn't like that coal is what is providing Apple with electricity. It has nothing to do with Apple in particular. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...n-tech-companyNo, we want to know that we are using the cheapest most dependable energy sources.
Next from Apple. The iSnorkle.
I want to read the chapter on why there isn't an XMac.
The iToy moniker is now official. But I guess it was bound to happen. Geoffrey the Giraffe sure isn't able to use a keyboard or mouse. But a touch screen is something he could possibly work.
Maybe she got tired of waiting to market the xMac.
New Posts  All Forums: