tshapi

IF i had to take a guess, it’s liberating. Because if have him more control. What is one of the reasons a regular shoot takes 6-8 weeks. Set up, and multiple takes. And large crews and casts.  Remember he wrote sex lies and videotape in a single week.  Using iPhones probably gives him freedom to move around and not lug around 10k cameras on tracks and Dolly’s and such.  It also allows for him to shoot in an unobtrusive way which. Helps get more realistic performances becuase they may or may not realize the camera is there. 

None of the technology in the vision pro is actually new. This is all from the isreali company that apple bought that used to partner with Xbox and helped create Face ID im sure.   The technology isn’t new, they implementation of how apple has applied the technology to “special computing” is new. 

volcan said:

One down side to wireless charging is that you can't pick up the phone and use it while charging. Might be convenient for cars that offer that capability because you are not supposed to pick up the phone while driving anyway, but I'd rather just have a battery that lasts all day under heavy usage so that I only need to charge at night where plugging it in is no big deal. I imagine a wireless charger is going to be a bit bulky, so not really that convenient to carry around.

Apple is working with 2 different companies to release a wireless charging capable of using radio waves and not the induction method. Rumor has it you will be able to charge your phone with in up to 15 feet of the charging plug.  

Apple releases a bundle to attract more customers. Oh my God! It’s the end of Spotify were to greedy to lower or prices in competition!  

Sounds like zuckerberg is just pissed that Apple is forcing Facebook to let customers know how sneaky and dishonest Facebook is.  

I suspect Foxconn and tsmc with an Apple cash contribution in return for a well priced product 

Not camera! Projector! That’s my 2 cents 

MFi program is more about apple making money. If it was simply about apple protecting its customers, then they wouldn’t be specifically creating an ecosystem that can only be used with there products. Forcing people to buy there cables.  

rundhvid said:

either way it will require MFi to unlock its potential

I’m baffled that AppleInsider doesn’t seem to understand the importance and value of MFi !

—in short, the MFi program is ’s attempt at making sure iPhone users are able to avoid compatibility issues due to cheap accessories, which are advertised as USB X.X compliant, but as a result of the USB-consortiums deliberate certification process, these accessories are truly “spec-compliant”, but deliver nonetheless inferior performance.

And who might the fellas that suffers these totally unnecessary problems direct their anger toward?

—it ain’t the no-name manufacturer of the damn cable!

 should be applauded for its MFi initiative.

You know apple will apply the same method it has to the iPhone and Apple Watch. Every year they come out with a new model, the previous model will become more affordable allowing for mass adoption, while the new model will adjust in price as components become more affordable. 

Personally, I think the issue is that companies like Spotify and Match Group don’t want to pay apples 15-30% fee.