vmarks

About

Username
vmarks
Joined
Visits
77
Last Active
Roles
editor
Points
905
Badges
2
Posts
762
  • Hyundai bosses 'agonizing' over whether to build 'Apple Car'

    dk49 said:
    If Hyundai decides to Ditch Apple, and Apple doesn't find another car manufacturer ready to assemble their cars, it will become really tough for Apple. They will have to build their own factories which will further delay the project. Though I wonder why Magna didn't say yes to it. They are basically the Foxconn for car manufacturers. And I am sure Apple must have approached them earlier.
    Like you, I think Apple contacted Magna early in the process.  Probably one of the first companies Apple contacted.  I think 2 things made Magna an unacceptable partner. 
    1. Location - I really think Apple desires a US assembly location.  The infrastructure for manufacturing and assembling their general tech (phones, computers, tablets, etc) is concentrated in Asia.  That's not the case for cars, and assembly in the US could even be cheaper.   Magna has no N. American plants.  It's rumored (again) they're looking to open a N. American plant, but that rumor has surfaced many times over the past couple of decades.
    2. Capacity - I've no doubt Magna could handle Apple's initial assembly and volume.  Apple's thinking long term.  Scale and capacity would be Magna's issue.  Magna doesn't have an advantage in ether of those factors that could compete with Hyundai's capacity.  Hyundai/Kia has the ability scale their production to meet any capacity Apple may need.  Magna doesn't have that ability.  They already contract manufacture Jaguar's I-Pace and E-Pace, Toyota's Supra, BMW's 5-Series and Z4, and MB's G-Class.  

    When this story initially broke, I said Apple was looking for an OEM/contract manufacturer, not a brand partner.  Some people are still incorrectly looking at this from a brand partner perspective.  Not really sure why.  Questions like, "why Hyundai and not BMW, MB, Porsche, or [insert luxury brand here]" still abound.  None of those brands would ever consider being an OEM manufacturer.  They would have the same concerns that Hyundai is expressing about brand erosion, 'cept their concerns would be magnified because their brands are waaaaaaay more valuable and influential than Hyundai's.  That's not a knock on Hyundai.  That's just reality.
    BMW -did- consider being an OEM partner with Apple. It fell apart as BMW lost their way on EV, giving up on i3, giving up on the electric 3 series prototypes used in SF, and refocusing on gas. 

    MB (Daimler) had talks, considered, and ended them as well. https://appleinsider.com/articles/16/04/20/rumor-control-of-user-data-railroaded-project-titan-talks-between-apple-and-bmw-daimler

    https://appleinsider.com/articles/16/04/18/apple-runs-secret-car-lab-in-berlin-with-15-20-employees-report-says

    We covered it here at AppleInsider. 
    muthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobraGeorgeBMac
  • This might be how law enforcement agencies break into the iPhone

    Gaby said:
    I’d be interested to know that if when you manually lock the phone down with a long press on sleep/wake + volume - which locks biometrics and necessitates password Re entry, if this is considered BFU or AFU. Technically it is AFU, but from what I remember Apple execs discussing, that is supposed to lock down the phone. In which case it is still feasible to lock people out without a power down. Hmmm.... 

    Emergency SOS mode is not the same as BFU.

    Notable differences are that in true BFU, the iPhone does not connect to Wi-Fi. With Emergency SOS mode, Wi-Fi remains connected.

    We have no idea how many keys get discarded when Emergency SOS mode is activated. What we do know is, it disables USB data, so any vulnerability is going to rely on a network attack (sending an iMessage exploit, for example.)
    Gabyelijahg
  • Everything unveiled at Apple's iPhone 12 event - and what AppleInsider thought

    Since the 12's are going to be using the Snapdragons, we don't have to worry about one phone cell version have more band options anymore, right?

    Typically the Verizon and Sprint ones were the ones that could do everything, but AT&T and T-Mobile lacked the CDMA bands. I just want to make sure that I have a Universal phone when I upgrade from my iPhone X.

    The CDMA versions lacked TMO's 700MHz band. You couldn't get a truly universal phone. The CDMA one is the more useful one if you travel internationally, although who's doing that these days?

    MustSeeUHDTVwatto_cobra
  • How to use an NVMe drive to upgrade your Mac's SSD

    jdw said:
    The article doesn't provide enough specifics.  For example, I have a mid-2015 15" MBP with Apple 1TB SSD and I get 2057MB WRITE & 2815MB READ.  What would something like the WD Black give me for the same 1TB size?

    Obviously, if I ever upgrade my SSD, it's foolish to get a 1TB.  2TB or larger would make logical sense.  But again, the benchmarks are lacking!  Please provide more info, AppleInsider!

    I suspect you would see a 500MB/s ± bump in speeds. This image is for the WD Black 1TB drive. 
    jdw
  • How to use an NVMe drive to upgrade your Mac's SSD

    Hopefully someone will see this:
    Is this, " format the new SSD drive as GUID partition scheme with macOS journaled file system. " correct? Shouldn't it be APFS?
    Hi, I wrote this article.

    No, format with macOS journaled, which used to be labeled HFS+ Journaled. The macOS installer will take care of converting / reformatting to APFS, you just want the drive visible to the installer as a target drive it can install on.

    It's possible you may not need to format the drive at all and the installer will take care of it, but I haven't tested that. I like formatting the drive, it reassures me that it's working correctly.
    llamacomcastsucks