Mike Wuerthele

About

Username
Mike Wuerthele
Joined
Visits
159
Last Active
Roles
administrator
Points
22,332
Badges
3
Posts
6,861
  • Apple will crush the DoJ in court if Garland sticks with outdated arguments

    bulk001 said:
    Only time will tell if you are right. Why don’t you reschedule this post for an update in 2 years. Personally my money is on the DOJ who, you know has actual lawyers and stuff, as opposed to two writers of an Apple blog. 
    It literally says in the article that we talked to DC antitrust lawyers.

    Two years is optimistic. I'd be surprised if this was done in five -- which is also addressed in the piece.
    teejay2012fastasleepwilliamlondonaderutterssfe11radarthekath2pBart Ymuthuk_vanalingammrstep
  • Apple will crush the DoJ in court if Garland sticks with outdated arguments

    Madbum said:
    Joe Biden needs to go. I am sorry but I am not usually political but this guy is ridiculous 
    This started two years into the Trump administration.
    NYC362hecaldernubusVictorMortimerOferking editor the grateroundaboutnowstevenozlordjohnwhorfinlesterkrimbaugh
  • iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 review: Twice the Thunderbolt bandwidth, twice the price

    killroy said:
    killroy said:
    killroy said:
    Using the term twice the bandwidth is playing with fire. This is not a Thunderbolt 5 dock.
    I guess I'm not sure what else you'd call it, considering it literally uses two Thunderbolt host ports, and two thunderbolt controllers in the dock.

    But you would have to use two thunderbolt ports on the Mac. And those ports would have to be independent. The last Mac with independent ports I have seen is a Mac mini Intel. Each CPU on KVM would only be giving you 40 Gb per second.
    Fundamentally, because of how Apple Silicon handles Thunderbolt I/O, all Thunderbolt ports on Apple Silicon Macs have independent bandwidth, and aren't on a timer. This is probably why the company says this dock only works on Apple Silicon.

    So you can get up to 80 Gib if you use both ports. I wonder if anyone did some testing on the real speed you get.
    This is really, really complicated for a lot of reasons. Thunderbolt and USB4 aren't really 40 gigabit in most cases, they're 32 gigabit and (maybe) an additional 8 gigabit -- and even that depends on PCI-E allocation to various ports, and engineering choices made not just by Apple, but by the dock, and attached peripheral vendors too. Then, there's ethernet and USB overhead. There's just too many variables to have a quantitative measure, absolutely, in every scenario.

    All we can really go on, is nearly all of the time, two thunderbolt ports, with two controllers on both ends = double the bandwidth.
    muthuk_vanalingamdavwatto_cobra
  • iVANKY FusionDock Max 1 review: Twice the Thunderbolt bandwidth, twice the price

    killroy said:
    killroy said:
    Using the term twice the bandwidth is playing with fire. This is not a Thunderbolt 5 dock.
    I guess I'm not sure what else you'd call it, considering it literally uses two Thunderbolt host ports, and two thunderbolt controllers in the dock.

    But you would have to use two thunderbolt ports on the Mac. And those ports would have to be independent. The last Mac with independent ports I have seen is a Mac mini Intel. Each CPU on KVM would only be giving you 40 Gb per second.
    Fundamentally, because of how Apple Silicon handles Thunderbolt I/O, all Thunderbolt ports on Apple Silicon Macs have independent bandwidth, and aren't on a timer. This is probably why the company says this dock only works on Apple Silicon.
    davwatto_cobra
  • Apple will reap the rewards of the cancelled Apple Car project for decades

    drdeade said:
    It’s typical that most of the posts on here are from the Apple worshipping side.  Frankly as a stock holder Apple should be liable to its share holders and a debacle like the EV apple car should result in a lawsuit that punishes apple for recklessly following a bad idea!  Thats money that could have been paid for dividends!  That’s money that could have been put back into the software which quite frankly stinks!  It’s important for people to realize that corporations are beholden to the stock holders.  Their focus must be based on profit for their share holders who have “loaned” apple the money to do what it is that they do.  In return those share holders should be compensated.  Apple doesn’t give shares but after this disgusting mess they should and Tim Cook should finally, and I mean finally be fired from his position.  When Apple moves from California which they will, Mr. Cook will have even more to defend for his enormous wasting of the Apple headquarters which is become more and more vacant!  I know that I ‘m ranting but as far as tech goes all were seeing is the result of giant monopolies that are hindering new technology and pirating patents from the small guy and only forced to pay when they have to, but only after much time and money spent on attorneys.  Apple: Ditch Cook, get real about development!  Look to see how creative people work.  Develop a pen to paper interface to capture the authenticity of real live creativity.  Use ingenuity to move the human spirit and stop miring down creativity with over emphasis on sexuality!  It simply doesn’t belong in the corporate culture.  Not one other company celebrates hetero day and I ‘m for everyone being treated equally and fairly but you’re letting it interfere with your production by not rewarding hard working people based on merit and it shows in your product.  ( Whew.  Now I can get down off my soap box.).  
    You missed the entire point of the article in your rant. To start: Apple is never, ever going to move out of California. Apple Park is sufficient evidence of that.

    And in regards to your comment about "shareholder compensation," I have no idea where you get that. And even if all of the $10 billion Apple spent on it in 10 years was somehow returned to shareholders, and it wouldn't have been, that's about 0.4 percent of the $2.8 trillion Apple made in that period.

    To be clear, that's not 40 percent, or four percent. That's four-tenths of one percent, rounding generously in favor of the shareholders in this imaginary scenario. And, it's nearly all R&D on AI.

    As I said in another thread, getting rid of Cook would be insane, and a really stupid idea for investors.


    tmaymuthuk_vanalingambloggerblogradarthekatAlex_Vbadmonkroundaboutnowwilliamlondonfastasleep