|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Kasper's Automated Slave
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,151
|
Sources reveal part of Apple's new iPod lineup with part numbers
Just hours before Apple is set to announce its new lineup of iPods, people familiar with the matter have revealed to AppleInsider part of the alleged product refresh, complete with purported model numbers.
A historically reliable source provided the list. The alleged lineup shows no capacity increases for the iPod nano and iPod shuffle, though the new 160GB iPod classic would be a bump up from 120GB. In addition, there is no iPod touch included, which could possibly be due to rumors of technical issues. AppleInsider also has reason to believe there could be significant changes to Nike+ technology announced at today's event, scheduled for 10 a.m. Pacific Time, 1 p.m. Eastern. The alleged partial lineup provided, with model numbers, is as follows: MC027LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - SILVER MC031LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - BLACK MC034LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - PURPLE MC037LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - BLUE MC040LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - GREEN MC043LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - YELLOW MC046LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - ORANGE MC049LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - RED MC050LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - PINK MC060LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - SILVER MC062LL/A - IPOD NANO 1[6]GB - BLACK MC064LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - PURPLE MC066LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - BLUE MC068LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - GREEN MC070LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - YELLOW MC072LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - ORANGE MC074LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - RED MC075LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - PINK MC293LL/A - IPOD CLASSIC 160GB - SILVER MC297LL/A - IPOD CLASSIC 160GB - BLACK MC306LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 2GB - SILVER MC307LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 4GB - GREEN MC323LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 2GB - BLACK MC328LL/A- IPOD SHUFFLE 4GB - BLUE MC331LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 4GB - PINK MC381LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 2GB - GREEN MC384LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 2GB - BLUE MC387LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 2GB - PINK |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 480
|
Just hours to go, to see how accurate the list is?
Sure would be nice to see something New & Exciting come out of this meeting. Skip |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 791
|
Do source think there might be a new iMac? Because Intel just released Core i5 this week.
An iMac with Core i5 and SSD would be nice. Core 2 duo and HD is so yesterday ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,218
|
Touch?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 399
|
I'll take the following:
Also one of the new 64GB Touch iPods, when they start shipping. ![]()
MA497LL/A FB063LL/B FB683LL/A MC137LL/A FB463LL/A
XK1 0141102 0107430 You can't do a Google search while talking on the Google Phone! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 23
|
They will be just adding some bling-bling to what's already available.
I'm not expecting anything special this time... iPod, is just so overrated. :P |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 235
|
If that lineup is proven correct, how uneventful from a hardware standpoint
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19
|
=[
i was rally hoping for a 32 gb ipod nano. (with camera)
for $200? that would sell like wildfire |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 123
|
That would be ... disappointing.
Wonder if this is just Apple trying to set expectations? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 7
|
Bring on the Nike+ integration into the nano!
One less piece to worry about losing. Hopefully they can add an HRM and update the software to allow for intervals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,115
|
Those specs for which shuffle? The latest one is so small why bother with colors?
Once you go Mac, you never go back!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Belgium
Posts: 351
|
I'm more anxious about a snappier itunes tbh, not that it's a low application as is, but something tells me that some Cocoaification might bring it up a notch. Last.fm integration would also be cool since it'd allow me too uninstall the bloatware that is audioscrobbler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: No GPS signal.
Posts: 1,169
|
(Double-post? Forums are messed up today.)
I wonder if we won't see a new Touch until it comes out in Jan alongside a companion tablet-size model? The old Touch (now cheaper) and the Classic will fill in for the holiday season. Just a thought.
nagromme
Would you like a treatment? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 652
|
all iMacs and Mac Mini's use the same laptop CPU's as MBP's. Mac Pro's use the same server CPU as xServe's and HP/Dell servers. Unless Apple comes out with a new desktop line, iMac's will stay the same until the next laptop CPU from Intel
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 447
|
Last year Apple dropped the thicker, dual-platter 160GB iPod Classic and bumped the thinner, single-platter 80GB Classic to 120GB. I can’t find any evidence that HDD makers have increased the capacity of the single platter 1.8” HDDs to 160GB, so unless Apple plans on going back to the thicker Classic (which I can’t see happening and wonder if they did why not bump it to 240GB with dual-platters) I can’t see how the Classic will move to 160GB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 447
|
double
Last edited by Logisticaldron; 09-09-2009 at 11:48 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 398
|
Quote:
No iMac announcement. This is gonna be an iTunes/iPod event. Apple typically keeps these events to one or two related topics. As well Intel announcements don't usually lead to Apple announcements. Apple announces their products on their schedule, not anyone else's, and Apple typically announces new hardware well after Intel, as the past has shown. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 686
|
No Touch=Epic fail IMO.
Its the key product in the iPod lineup now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
|
how long will we have to wait for itouch upgrade? was hoping they'd announce now, sell as soon as tech fixed...?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
|
think there will be new ipods and apple tv because of movies on itunes...
but still waiting for new imacs.. ![]() follow AppleStoreCheck on twitter and be the first to know when apple store is offline ;P |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 447
|
Quote:
Last edited by Logisticaldron; 09-09-2009 at 12:35 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 23
|
Come on. The press event is just hours away. Do we really need this update. Is it really so long to wait to hear it from the horse's mouth? The scoop whatever it is, will be known to everybody later this morning (if it's true that is)
And no, I didn't read this post. I can wait the hour or two to hear for real. I'm just commenting that a "sources say" post at this point just seems ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 686
|
30 minutes boys and girls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 399
|
Quote:
![]() LOL, let me know when Twitter is online! Quote:
![]() (Props to MrX, BTW!) While you aren't reading this, be sure to not read about iTunes LP... ![]()
MA497LL/A FB063LL/B FB683LL/A MC137LL/A FB463LL/A
XK1 0141102 0107430 You can't do a Google search while talking on the Google Phone! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5
|
I think we can say for sure the nano HD is correct looking at all the recent nano 5G cases in globalsources and the Touch with a camera in the center, also proven from case designs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 447
|
I got it when you pointed out there was a direct reference to the Stones, but outside of that it’s a bit abstract when you consider that the only Stones reference is the slogan of the event and presumably has nothing else to do with the band.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 399
|
I meant the reference to wanting Black and Blue iPods... n/m I suddenly feel old...
MA497LL/A FB063LL/B FB683LL/A MC137LL/A FB463LL/A
XK1 0141102 0107430 You can't do a Google search while talking on the Google Phone! |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 447
|
I presume you were referencing the Stones' album Black & Blue, which I get. But I previously stated, it’s all a bit abstract for people to get without you directly pointing out that you are making a Stones reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 849
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|