|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Kasper's Automated Slave
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,151
|
Apple releases Mac OS X 10.6.1, security updates, more
The first maintenance update for Snow Leopard, Apple's latest operating system, was released Thursday afternoon, less than two weeks after the software's debut.
According to Apple, the 71.47MB update "includes general operating system fixes that enhance the stability, compatibility and security of your Mac." It is available via Software Update or direct download from Apple. According to the release notes, Mac OS X 10.6.1: Improves compatibility with some Sierra Wireless 3G modems Addresses an issue in which some printer compatibility drivers might not appear properly in the Add Printer browser Addresses an issue that might cause DVD playback to stop unexpectedly Addresses an issue that might make it difficult to remove an item from the Dock Resolves an issue in which the Command-Option-T keyboard shortcut would sometimes bring up the special characters menu in applications such as Mail and TextEdit Addresses instances in which auto account setup in Mail might not work Resolves issues when sending mail with certain SMTP servers Addresses an issue in which Motion 4 could become unresponsive Includes an update to Adobe Flash Player plug-in version 10.0.32.18 Also released Thursday was Mac OS X Server 10.6.1. The 71.57MB download is also available for download from Apple. The update includes improved reliability of services using Grand Central Dispatch, and a fix for duplicate serial number alerts on servers with multiple network interfaces. Apple's older operating systems also received security updates. Security Update 2009-005 is available for Leopard Server (93.1MB), Leopard (93.14MB), Tiger Server (206.43MB), Tiger Server Power PC (132.53MB), and Tiger Intel (169.75MB). Also issued Thursday was iMac Graphics Firmware Update 1.0.2. The update applies to iMac computers with an ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro or ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT graphics card running Mac OS X 10.5.2 or later. It updates the graphics card firmware to improve system stability. Finally, Apple also released an update for Apple RAID Card firmware. The 26.12MB download: Improves reliability during startup and power loss recovery. Addresses a potential issue when rebuilding a degraded RAID 5. Resolves an issue that can fill the on-board flash file system. Improves battery handling and reporting. Improves compatibility with Mac OS X v10.6 and Mac OS X Server v10.6. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 407
|
Wow. I think that was the fastest update in Apple's history
"An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest."
"Those who would give up essential liberties to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither." -Ben Franklin |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 235
|
Well considering they have had about 5 weeks to work on it, but yes it was pretty quick to get it out there. However I feel that .2 will take a lot longer to release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2
|
Well, my Canon Imageclass MF4150 is still broken. Guess I'm going to downgrade to 10.5 until it works with 10.6 as Leo Laporte said...!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 407
|
Yeah, you are probably gonna be right on that one.
"An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest."
"Those who would give up essential liberties to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither." -Ben Franklin |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5
|
I installed the update a few hours ago and I had not a single crash of Photoshop or Dreamweaver since then. Before the install they were all over the place... It might be a bit premature, but Apple might as well have fixed this issue without writing about it. Let's hope that it is really more stable now and not just a lucky accident.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Frustrating.
My Canon IPF5100, which us an Ethernet printer works fine. My HP CLS8500N, also a network model, doesn't. The Canon worked with 10.6 as well. All my USB printers work, though I had to add a driver from Apple's list, though the correct driver was installed for my Samsung SCX-4521F. All the printers I have show up in the print dialog box and the add printer window except the HP. The only way to add the HP is through the IP printing menu. I've never had to do that before. But even after it's added, and set up, which works well, it pauses when a job is sent, because it says that it can't find the printer. The driver will resume when I delete the job. I don't understand why it won;t see the printer as the Ethernet lights on the router and printer are on, showing that it's recognized by the network. When I plug the cable into the second Ethernet port on the Mac Pro, it till doesn't see it. This is odd. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 261
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 599
|
Firefox auto-updated and warned me I needed to update Adobe Flash (again, I just did it last week) before I ran the Software Update.
So Apple must have thrown in a few easy bug fixes with the last update to include Flash. Adobe, Adobe, Adobe, what are we going to do with you?
Glossy screens will errode consumers interest in computers because it makes it harder to see the screen around the reflections.
People forced to use glossy screen computers for long hours will have physical problems eventually. See here |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
This is even to the point of installing drivers themselves. I went to HP's site where I can find the latest driver for my now older printer. This time when I went there, it said that no drivers were needed, as it was taken care of by Apple. The drivers for many printers are in Apple's software. All the drivers for my HP CLS 8500N are there, but it doesn't help. Apple farked something, and they have to fix it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,773
|
Quote:
• http://forums.appleinsider.com/showp...1&postcount=31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
Besides I then manually edited this after I had a problem. It's now using Apple's drivers, or at least, the drivers that HP supplied Apple. It should see the printer no matter what. The fact that it doesn't is disturbing. All the Canon drivers are Canon's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 94
|
Unfortunately, performance is even lower than 10.6.0 as measured by Xbench. Open GL is 1% even slower or more than double less than Leopard
.
Mac Pro, 8 Core, 32 GB RAM, nVidia Ge 8800 GT, 2 TB storage, 30'' Cinema Display Mac OS X (10.6.2) 24'' iMac, 13'' Aluminum Macbook 2.0 GHz, 3G iPhone
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 204
|
Well I guess Tiger isn't quite dead yet. Seeing how quite this 10.6.1 release was, I guess it's still possible for Leopard to get 10.5.9 with the next 10.6.2 since Tiger got 10.4.11 when Leopard got 10.5.1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,773
|
10.5.8 was dragged out for a considerably long time with many, many Betas, and there has been no 10.5.9 Betas since the 10.5.8 release, so I’m guessing that security and app updates are the only thing Leopard users can look forward to at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 82
|
I've installed Mac OS X 10.6.1. Still a few minor quirks for me.
I have a Samsung ML-2850D laser printer. Samsung did update the driver at Mac OS X 10.6.0, and the printer prints OK. But the Smart Panel portion for the desktop still generates errors, which I can see in the Console. Not a big problem, and you can exit Smart Panel to kill that process. I guess Samsung will eventually port those panels to the Cocoa frameworks. I use Zoom all the time, and I see a quirk there. My iMac has a ATI Radeon HD 2600 video card. The Zoom works, except that if you do a mouse click on a window portion (not an input field), a sudden re-positioning of the window can occur. I've also discovered that AppleScript applications may need to be recompiled. I had a script that needed Rosetta to be executed! A recompile fixed that. But basically, I'm pleased with Snow Leopard. I would expect that Mac OS X 10.6.2 to have a much bigger set of bug fixes reflecting customer experiences in the field. Edit: There is firmware posted today for the Radeon HD 2600 Pro and Radeon HD 2400 XT for some iMac models. I downloaded it, and tried to install, but got a message that my model iMac didn't need it. Still getting unexpected window re-positioning with Zoom. 2nd edit: Re: Samsung Smart Panel for printer…apparently Samsung updated the drivers but not the Smart Panel for SL. Resolved problem by going to adm. account and System Preferences > Accounts > Login Items and deleted 'SPanel'. That resolved the crashes that showed up on the console log and removed the Smart Panel icon on the desktop menu bar. Re: inability to install firmware…Apple's documentation about the firmware update for graphic cards was apparently too broad, causing the futile attempts to install by a lot of people (including me). Last edited by BertP; 09-13-2009 at 09:29 PM.. Reason: FYI |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 94
|
Well, it means I got distracted
. I meant to say (as you probably guessed) it's less than half the performance of Leopard.
Mac Pro, 8 Core, 32 GB RAM, nVidia Ge 8800 GT, 2 TB storage, 30'' Cinema Display Mac OS X (10.6.2) 24'' iMac, 13'' Aluminum Macbook 2.0 GHz, 3G iPhone
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
HTML Code:
Results 252.74 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.5.8 (9L30) Physical RAM 32768 MB Model MacPro3,1 Drive Type WDC WD3200AAJS-41VWA0 CPU Test 190.72 GCD Loop 327.96 17.29 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 160.63 3.82 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 134.16 4.43 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 235.57 41.02 Mops/sec Thread Test 830.59 Computation 1124.19 22.77 Mops/sec, 4 threads Lock Contention 658.59 28.33 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Memory Test 202.30 System 284.32 Allocate 314.73 1.16 Malloc/sec Fill 243.49 11838.90 MB/sec Copy 306.07 6321.67 MB/sec Stream 157.00 Copy 160.48 3314.67 MB/sec Scale 157.71 3258.27 MB/sec Add 155.89 3320.85 MB/sec Triad 154.07 3296.01 MB/sec Quartz Graphics Test 243.39 Line 219.20 14.59 Klines/sec [50% alpha] Rectangle 295.86 88.33 Krects/sec [50% alpha] Circle 240.56 19.61 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha] Bezier 235.66 5.94 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha] Text 238.06 14.89 Kchars/sec OpenGL Graphics Test 185.37 Spinning Squares 185.37 235.15 frames/sec User Interface Test 351.35 Elements 351.35 1.61 Krefresh/sec HTML Code:
Results 209.29 System Info Xbench Version 1.3 System Version 10.6 (10A432) Physical RAM 32768 MB Model MacPro3,1 Drive Type WD 5000BEV External CPU Test 199.19 GCD Loop 329.53 17.37 Mops/sec Floating Point Basic 159.06 3.78 Gflop/sec vecLib FFT 131.91 4.35 Gflop/sec Floating Point Library 314.56 54.78 Mops/sec Thread Test 841.97 Computation 1155.73 23.41 Mops/sec, 4 threads Lock Contention 662.20 28.49 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads Memory Test 213.36 System 336.79 Allocate 606.04 2.23 Malloc/sec Fill 247.60 12038.67 MB/sec Copy 310.68 6416.90 MB/sec Stream 156.13 Copy 157.24 3247.78 MB/sec Scale 157.88 3261.67 MB/sec Add 155.20 3306.02 MB/sec Triad 154.28 3300.33 MB/sec Quartz Graphics Test 216.11 Line 192.80 12.84 Klines/sec [50% alpha] Rectangle 237.36 70.87 Krects/sec [50% alpha] Circle 204.41 16.66 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha] Bezier 229.12 5.78 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha] Text 223.22 13.96 Kchars/sec OpenGL Graphics Test 96.71 Spinning Squares 96.71 122.69 frames/sec User Interface Test 356.31 Elements 356.31 1.64 Krefresh/sec Note also that after update to 10.6.1 I got: HTML Code:
OpenGL Graphics Test 93
Mac Pro, 8 Core, 32 GB RAM, nVidia Ge 8800 GT, 2 TB storage, 30'' Cinema Display Mac OS X (10.6.2) 24'' iMac, 13'' Aluminum Macbook 2.0 GHz, 3G iPhone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 20
|
Wow, Apple's already released an update for Snow Leopard and I'm still waiting for super-slow Canada Post to deliver my install disk
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,773
|
Quote:
Then there is the nature of the test. Xbench is rout with issues that may supply an okay starting point but one should never use it as conclusive evidence as to how well your system performs. Have you tried other testing apps? Did you use the 64-bit version of XBench? Is it even optimized for use on SL yet? I see that the results for 10.6 beat 10.5 in CPU thread and memory tests, as one would expect. I’d wager that the test isn’t accurate for OpenGl and Quartz. There are other tests that show these have been well improved in SL and the tests were not using XBench so I’d have to side with them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Which brings me to the next point. Like I mentioned speed of the disk was not measured in either test. Also, graphics driver is loaded in memory when the system starts so, disk performance should not come into play. Also, if anything my Leopard install has more things running at all times, unlike the Snow Leopard test which had nothing but clean OS X install and XBench on it .
Mac Pro, 8 Core, 32 GB RAM, nVidia Ge 8800 GT, 2 TB storage, 30'' Cinema Display Mac OS X (10.6.2) 24'' iMac, 13'' Aluminum Macbook 2.0 GHz, 3G iPhone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Second star to the right
Posts: 595
|
Good to have you back, Mel.
![]()
Pity the agnostic dyslectic. They spend all their time contemplating the existence of dog.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,773
|
Quote:
• http://www.macnn.com/articles/09/08/...snow.leopards/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 634
|
Leaping lizards I'm off to download it. Good job Steve and Co!
![]()
Tory Hagen
Break the Wedge! |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 634
|
My printer can print now!
Thank you HP and Apple! You've restored my faith in both of you in being considerate of the environment by not abandoning slightly older printers.
![]()
Tory Hagen
Break the Wedge! |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
I'm beginning to wonder if Apple really shipped them. My promised delivery date was 3 September. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Cheese
Posts: 456
|
Just to join in ... Snow Leopard Sucks!
![]() My <obscure inkjet printer> won't work when it's connected to my <cheap network device from 1995> especially when I'm sending <obscure file type from five year out of date program> using Rosetta on my hackintosh tower. ![]()
It was a widely held belief by the smartest people in late 1400's Europe that human knowledge and indeed civilisation itself, had advanced to such a nearly complete and perfect state, that the "end times" were certainly almost upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 73
|
LOL! But seriously, we owe Apple lots of credit for distributing bug fixes as fast as they have. Anytime there's a major revamp to a complex operating system, we have to expect that the huge population of users with varied hardware and varied legacy software will uncover problems that are never discovered even in extended beta test stages. Let's count our blessings that we're not installing a new operating system from Microsoft!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,055
|
Printer drivers and Snow Leopard: A possible general workaround
If drivers for your printer do not show up in Snow Leopard, and there is no option for a generic driver (that you can use until original ones arrive), then you might be in luck if you've got your Leopard disc handy.
Insert your Leopard disc, and then click on Optional Installs. Then in the next window you might have to click on Optional Installs again. From the new Window, select Printer drivers. Select the appropriate brand, and then install. So really, we're trying to use Leopard drivers here, moved from your Leopard disc onto Snow Leopard. If you're in luck, usable drivers might show up in your System Preferences, or perhaps a generic driver that will work. Best of luck!
(Formerly LTD on Neowin.net) (currently *LTD* on Macrumors.com)
Mac OS users have made a conscious technology choice and are therefore typically better informed than their peers. -- Paul Thurrott, winsupersite.com, December 06, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 2,695
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16
|
Apple fix the damn vertical lines in safari !!!!!! It's freaking annoying
damn!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5
|
graphics fw update ??
Any idea why my Late 2007 iMac (10.6.1) with Radeon HD 2600 Pro does not think the FW update applies to it ??
Apple say: "This update is for iMac computers with an ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro or ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT graphics card installed, running Mac OS X 10.5.2 or later. It updates the graphics card firmware on the ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro or ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT graphics card in the iMac to improve system stability." I downloaded the FW installer, ran it, and it says it doesn't apply to my computer... I can't tell from System Profiler what version is currently running. In Graphics/Display, System Profiler says: ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro Chipset: ATI,RadeonHD2600 . . . Vendor ATI (0x1002) DeviceID 0x9583 RevisionID 0x0000 ROM Version 113-B2250F-212 EFI Driver Version 01.00.212 . . |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2
|
Well, my Canon was working before Snow Leopard. I do know that this isn't Apple fault, but it's broken now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 24
|
I noticed the same thing with the new ATi firmware and after checking via system profiler these are the differences I noticed and would be the reason it is not needed.
ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro Chipset: ATI,RadeonHD2600 . . . Vendor ATI (0x1002) DeviceID 0x9583 RevisionID 0x0000 ROM Version 113-B2250F-219 EFI Driver Version 01.00.219 The above 2 have 219 at the end instead of 212 This is under 10.6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|