|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Kasper's Automated Slave
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,151
|
New Apple laptop to feature Intel Robson cache technology?
Although Intel only demonstrated its Robson cache technology in the fourth quarter of last year, DigiTimes is citing sources who claim that Apple Computer will launch a laptop in the middle of January that utilizes the NAND flash based cache memory technology.
The publication, which has been less than accurate in its predictions of future Apple hardware over the last couple of years, said sources did not say which line of Apple notebooks would implement the technology. Robson cache technology, which Intel demonstrated during the Intel Developer Forum Taipei this past October, relies on NAND flash instead of a traditional hard disk drive (HDD) for starting up a computer or launching frequently used applications. Some of the benefits of the technology are speedier computer boot time and improve battery life. Industry observers told DigiTimes that there are three possible ways Apple can deploy Robson technology in its notebook, the most convenient of which would be to equip the device with a NAND flash disk on module (DOM) that would plug into an ATA slot. "Another method would be a combination memory solution, whereby Robson is deployed on the HDD," according to the publication. "HDD makers would provide an addition density area that would be assigned to NAND flash." The last solution, which may also the most direct solution, is to embedded the Robson-flash into a chipset or create an additional slot on the motherboard for such memory, DigiTimes said. Sources have previously told AppleInsider to expect the first Intel-based Macs at next week's Macworld Expo in San Francisco, which may include the first 15-inch Intel PowerBook. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,453
|
I'll see it when I believe it.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 861
|
Hard to imagine if the benefits would be worth the additional cost, especially considering most Mac users just put their Macs to sleep anyhow, thus negating boot times entirely already. And launching an Application is generally also a one-time thing per session. As someone mentioned in another thread, for the cost of the NAND chips why not just make more RAM standard?
Unless of course the use of the NAND chip is for a device that doesn't have a Hard Drive at all, like a Media Center Hub that streams all content from other locations. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 1 Infinite Fluke, CA Hates: Integrated graphics
Posts: 822
|
We all know how accurate DigiTimes has been...
![]()
198419841984
Where were you when the hammer flew? 13" MacBook Pro, 2.53 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 128GB SSD ::: iPhone 3GS 32GB |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 8
|
I wish.
but from a development pont of view, I don't see why or how they would take up 2 new technologies (new to them) at the same time, too many thing can go wrong.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
|
I can see the partial substitution option used for most-read files, but not a complete switch is a way off.
This isn't like flash memory replacing the 1" drives, those were very expensive for their storage anyway, so the low relative cost difference made it a logical switch for portable audio players. Flash is still way too expensive to be useful for laptop mass storage unless you keep a very small OS and don't carry much data. I think it needs to cost 5% or less of it is now to be able to be anywhere near competing. At retail, laptop hard drives are pretty close to $1/GB now, flash is pretty close to $40/GB. Last edited by JeffDM; 01-05-2006 at 05:32 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
This IS going to happen. I just depends on whether it will be Apple or someone else.
It's not implausable. This is one of those things that Intel is pushing that Apple is positioned to use. January might be early. But I wouldn't be surprised to see it by the middle of the year. About pricing, they are only talking MB's not GB's. It shouldn't cost that much. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 653
|
I'll only say that the Robson thing is one of the keys to what I've been talking about if you've been following my posts on another thread. The concept is simple, implementation not difficult.
This is just too freakin' good! My brain's about to leap outta my skull! Prepare to be amazed. Floored would be more like it. Save up your money for something cool. Very cool! I know, easier said than done. Just got my natural gas bill. Yow! Time to double up on the black turtlenecks. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: LA
Posts: 938
|
Quote:
Still waiting for that ThinkSecret update... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 63
|
This would be a great way to differentiate the iBooks and Powerbooks, seeing as they're going to have to have close to the same level of CPU's inside.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Underneath It All
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
http://www.lacie.com/products/product.htm?pid=10268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 114
|
You mean like the following, only substituting "Windows Vista" with "Macintosh":
External memory devices Adding system memory (RAM) is often the best way to improve your PC's performance. More memory means more applications are ready to run without accessing the hard drive. However, upgrading memory is not always easy. You must learn what type of memory you need, purchase the memory, and open your computer to install the memory—which sometimes can invalidate your support agreement. Also, some machines have limited memory expansion capabilities, preventing you from adding RAM even if you are willing to do so. Windows Vista introduces a new concept in adding memory to a system. USB flash drives can be used as External Memory Devices (EMDs) to extend system memory and improve performance without opening the box. Your computer is able to access memory from an EMD device much more quickly than it can access data on the hard drive, boosting system performance. When combined with SuperFetch technology, this can help drive impressive improvement in system responsiveness. EMD technology is both reliable and secure. You can remove an EMD at any time without any loss of data or negative impact to the system; however, if you remove the EMD, your performance returns to the level you experienced without the device. Wear on the USB drive is not an issue when using it as an EMD. A unique algorithm optimizes wear patterns, so that a USB device can run as an EMD for many years, even when heavily used. Finally, data on the EMD is encrypted to help prevent inappropriate access to data when the device is removed. Hybrid Hard Drive A Hybrid Hard Drive is a new type of hard drive with an integrated non-volatile flash memory buffer. If your machine is equipped with a Hybrid Hard Drive, Windows Vista takes advantage of this hardware to boot, hibernate, and resume use more quickly. Hybrid Hard Drive technology can also improve system reliability and battery life. The hybrid drive is intended for mobile PCs running Windows Vista. Your data is written to the flash memory, which saves work for the mechanical hard drive—saving you battery power. The hybrid drive helps Windows Vista resume use faster from Sleep because data can be restored from flash memory faster than from the mechanical hard drive. And since the mechanical hard drive is not working when you are in Sleep state with the Hybrid Hard Drive, you have less risk of hardware problems with the hard drive when you're on the move. Windows Vista takes advantage of Hybrid Hard Drives to save battery life, resume use faster from hibernation, and improve reliability. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 268
|
Wasn't there discussion a while back about a Mini for the living room, and a patent for streaming video "that never touches the hard drive"?
Does NAND flash have any value there? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,158
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 25
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 293
|
The LaCie Carte Orange looks like a miniature hard drive device to me, 6mm thick and no noise to speak of ... remind anyone of an iPod?
I for one am praying for the move away from platter drives. They fail too much. They break first on impact. They age. And they suffer from extreme cold and extreme heat way before the other components of a computer do. All this is simply because they have moving parts! Get those the hell out of my computer! I want it all solid state, with wi-max for the really big stuff. Apple are so much going to be at the vanguard of the switch from HDD. Their laptops and of course iPods are the first place it's going to happen. The living room PVR Mac won't be able to record for itself without a hefty standard hard drive for the time being, and the desktops will take a while to move in general. But NAND is getting there. I'd love to see the Xserve complete this move before the decade is out!! But I'll settle for the laptops first. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
|
Quote:
Last edited by JeffDM; 01-05-2006 at 11:42 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
The other problem is that the money adds up pretty quick. A 10 GB drive sounds neat. But when you're comparing it to a 500GB drive, it doesn't seem so neat anymore. The price gets out of hand pretty quickly. $18.75 per GB (if correct) looks good. Cut the price in four=$4.75,for volume, and multiply by 500. That gives us $2370.00. That's a bit rich for most people. As the price comes down, so does that of HD's. There will be a severe price premium for a long time to come. This hasn't been the first time that HD's were predicted to leave the scene because of some new technology. Anyone remember bubble memory? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
Look at the fastest NAND out there. SLOW! Remember how they rate the memory? By the number of times it is faster that a 1 speed CD reader. 1 speed = 150KB/S. The fastest flash out there now is 120 speed, for medium size chips. That's 18MB/S. As I said, slow. DRAM is MUCH faster. So are HD's. That's why we won't see NAND replace either RAM or HD's anytime soon if performance is an issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 133
|
PIO mode 4 is only 16.7 MB/s. If a BIOS starts up using this mode, then flash would be competitive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
But the rest of the speculation is just off center. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 225
|
Mac OS X uses files to swap memory... slow
Linux and other OSes use a dedicated partition... faster NAND flash memory could be useful to use as a primary swap location. This would add another step in memory hierarchy, somehow : CPU registers << L1 cache << L2 cache << (L3 cache) << RAM << NAND swap << Hard drive swap
Basically everything goes round. We're 80% dinosaur.
-- Alex James |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
Bubble memory which had been thought to offer much larger capacity/price ratio's were left in the dust, as they hadn't come to market yet. Flash is also sequential. That's one of the reasons why it's slow. They had worked out many of the access problems with bubble, but it didn't matter by then. It also didn't have the read/write limitations that Flash has. Actually, it's longitivity was much better than magnetic technology, with an almost infinite life, and no degradation of stored information for many years. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
Macs already wake up fast enough (for me) from normal sleep but would certainly benefit from using flash memory just for safe sleep without being a full-blown Robson cache. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
Let's also understand what they mean by that. Because the drive is powered down, as was mentioned, it takes time to turn on, spin up, do self checks, position its head, and then to start reading the data out. This more than makes up for the slower Flash memory, for this purpose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: It's far too hot here
Posts: 1,755
|
Worth mentioning is when Intel showed off Robson they showed significant performance improvements using only 128 MB of flash. It doesn't require huge amounts of flash memory.
"When I was a kid, my favourite relative was Uncle Caveman. After school, we’d all go play in his cave, and every once and awhile, he’d eat one of us. It wasn’t until later that I discovered Uncle Caveman was a bear."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 5,249
|
Quote:
These rumors are just shooting all over the map. I suppose if you make 100 guesses one of them has to be right. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The International Center for Rumour Control
Posts: 3,133
|
A large Flash memory's main impact might very well be power consumption, not speed. The amount of battery power required to spool up that disk all the time is considerable. Imagine a laptop where it only had to spool the disk when you actual read or wrote files, not while you were just working away on your document or reading websites.
Providing grist for the rumour mill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
![]() I'm surprised they don't just dump the OS on a 8 gig flash device and just use the hard disk to save documents etc. on it ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 540
|
Like we really need analysts speculating the obvious.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
For business purposes what they say can be important, while what you say isn't. That's why it matters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Somewhere far, far away
Posts: 2,858
|
Being an Apple analyst is the easiest job on the planet. They only need a few website addresses. http://www.appleinsider.com, http://www.thinksecret.com, http://www.macrumors.com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
|
Quote:
Macosrumors has gone straight down the tubes the past few years. It's one of the least professionally produced sites on the net. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 209
|
Could this rumor actually apply to the MacBook Pro? I've seen at least one report of extremely fast boot up and application launches from somebody at the Expo.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|