AppleInsider AppleInsider Forums


Go Back   AppleInsider > Applications
Register Members List New Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-23-2006, 09:55 AM   #1
AppleInsider
Kasper's Automated Slave
 
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,155
Quark delays native Intel Mac support

First on AI: Macintosh users eager to run an official release of QuarkXPress 7 natively on their new Intel Macs will be disappointed to learn that Quark has rolled back the Universal Binary release of the software by several months.

As expected, Quark on Tuesday began shipping the major upgrade to its market-leading design and publishing software world-wide. But contrary to comments made by the company at Macworld Expo in January and in previous marketing materials, the Macintosh version of the software is not a Universal Binary capable of running natively on both PowerPC- and Intel-based Macs.

Instead, the system requirements for QuarkXPress 7 state that the software will operate under Apple's Rosetta PowerPC emulation environment when run on Intel Macs.

The decision not to ship QuarkXPress 7 as a Universal Binary appears to have been made last minute. A close inspection of the QuarkXPress 7 retail boxes reveals that both "Mac" and "Universal" logos are printed on all copies. However, the "Universal" logos have been covered with a "Mac" logo sticker.

In continuing its development of a QuarkXPress 7 Universal Binary, Quark has renamed the Quark XPress 7 beta program to "Quark XPress 7 Universal Binary Beta."

According to a source familiar with Quark's product plans, a patch that will be released in August will update the shipping versions of QuarkXPress 7 to a Universal Binary.

Representatives for Quark were not immediately available for comment.

The QuarkXPress 7 upgrade combines new and enhanced design features with multi-channel publishing, collaboration, and job-driven workflow capabilities to simplify and speed up the creative development process for print and Web publishing.

Through Composition Zones, Job Jackets, transparency, OpenType, Unicode, and many other new features, the software also improves the ability for creative professionals to work together, optimize design, and minimize production errors.

QuarkXPress 7 will retail for about $750 with upgrades costing about $250. Official pricing has not yet been released.
AppleInsider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2006, 10:17 AM   #2
Vox Barbara
grain of truth
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: mull over
Posts: 1,891
Quote:
Originally posted by AppleInsider
Macintosh users eager to run an official release of QuarkXPress 7 natively on their new Intel Macs will be disappointed to learn that Quark has rolled back the Universal Binary release of the software by several months.

...
Actually, does anybody has first hand experiences concerning
Rosetta and QXPess 7? Maybe i'll come back.


" I will not commit anything to memory that I can get from another source . . . "
ALBERT EINSTEIN


Last edited by Vox Barbara; 05-23-2006 at 10:58 AM..
Vox Barbara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2006, 10:20 AM   #3
Robin Hood
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 490
The race is on: Quark versus Adobe.

Who can release a Universal Binary first? Amazingly, Quark is winning so far: they already have a public beta of Quark 7 as a universal binary available, which I've done some testing with and, surprisingly, it seems to work well.

But perhaps Adobe can catch up, especially now that Quark stumbled?

I, for one, am excited!
Robin Hood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2006, 03:01 PM   #4
ecking
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,564
Quote:
Originally posted by Robin Hood
The race is on: Quark versus Adobe.

Who can release a Universal Binary first? Amazingly, Quark is winning so far: they already have a public beta of Quark 7 as a universal binary available, which I've done some testing with and, surprisingly, it seems to work well.

But perhaps Adobe can catch up, especially now that Quark stumbled?

I, for one, am excited!
Quark in this case, Adobe can't drop by august it's just not in the cards.
ecking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2006, 08:13 PM   #5
CharlesS
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 1990
Location: ylamona laropmet a ni kcutS
Posts: 287
Quote:
Quark delays native Intel Mac support
Well there's a big surprise right there...


Proud member of AppleInsider since before the World Wide Web existed.
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2006, 10:06 PM   #6
wilco
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: LA
Posts: 938
Quote:
Originally posted by Robin Hood
Who can release a Universal Binary first? Amazingly, Quark is winning so far:
How is it amazing? Quark has one product to put out, while Adobe has an entire suite.
wilco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2006, 10:12 PM   #7
the_snitch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by wilco
How is it amazing? Quark has one product to put out, while Adobe has an entire suite.
It's amazing because Quark are generally pretty slow when it comes to anything. They only just realised that people hate them and are moving to Adobe.
the_snitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2006, 10:49 PM   #8
ClimbingTheLog
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 63
August, eh?

Quark generally knows more about what's happening inside Apple than most companies. They're still very important in publishing even if they do deserve to have their automatic external defribulators hooked up to their license management system.

So, I'm betting they decided to wait to ship a 64-bit version for the new MacPro's with the universal binary. The timing's just too good.
ClimbingTheLog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2006, 08:32 AM   #9
clonenode
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 382
Well, this is just another reason to NOT to upgrade from 6.5. And I'm a G5 user, so the Universal Binary doesn't matter - but still, I will wait for the inevitable version 7.1 - UB or not.


c l o n e n o d e
o n e o f m a n y
clonenode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 07:05 AM   #10
Longsilver
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 11
A further problem with adopting or returning to Quark, for European users, is the pricing. Conversions from British Pounds and Euro to US Dollars were done on xe.com.

US Apple Store:
QuarkXpress 7 - $749.95
Passport Edition - $1499.95

UK Apple Store:
QuarkXpress 7 - £879.01 (≈$1657.71)
Passport Edition - £1049.00 (≈$1977.96)

Ireland Apple Store:
QuarkXpress 7 - €1299.00 (≈$1683.97)
Passport Edition - €1549.01 (≈$2008.08)

So, for the basic version of QuarkXpress 7 the UK customer pays an extra $907.76, a mark-up of 121% on the US price. The Euro customer pays an extra $934.02, a mark-up of 124% on the US price.

If my figures are correct, and I think they are, then it would be cheaper for me to get a flight from Europe to the US, buy a copy of QuarkXpress 7 there, and then fly home to Europe than it would be to buy the thing in Europe in the first place.

Can anyone explain this? Is the product offered to UK/Eurozone customers sufficiently different from the US version to justify this price difference? Are Quark buying an individual airline seat for each and every copy they ship to Europe?

See also:
http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index...e=1&pagePos=16
Longsilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 07:11 AM   #11
Chucker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,066
Part of it is the inclusion of VAT (US prices exclude this), part of it is EU customs. The rest of pure arrogance on the company's part.

Sadly, this isn't unusual. Adobe prices, for instance, frequently suffer the same problem.
Chucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 04:56 PM   #12
Longsilver
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 11
More on this pricing issue from MacWorld:

http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index...e&NewsID=14848

It sounds as if Quark are just ramping up the price to the maximum point where they think they can get away with it. And you're right - Adobe seem to do something similar. (I think you're right about the arrogance, too.)
Longsilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.