|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Kasper's Automated Slave
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,166
|
High-quality Apple AirPort Extreme 802.11n unboxing photos
Apple Inc. this week began to unleash the next-generation of Apple Wi-Fi, with the first shipments of its AirPort Extreme 802.11n Wireless Base Station making their way to select online customers and company retail stores.
If you're like us, you probably placed an order for one of these promising wireless network performance enhancers during the week of Macworld. And if you're like us, you're probably still waiting for that order to ship. Even though our online order was placed way back when, it's not slated to leave Taiwan until around February 14. At the same time, however, we were able to swing by a local Apple retail store an pluck one off the shelf. Somewhat nonsensical from a customer relations standpoint, so pardon us while we grunt. Nevertheless, they are shipping. If you're looking to pick one up this weekend, you best call around. While some Apple retail stores have received shipment, others have not. And there appears to no methodical procedure behind which stores are first to receive their inventory. Anyway, the new AirPort Extremes, which weigh a couple of pounds, come nestled in rather uneventful packaging of relative dimensions. The router itself rests atop a cardboard platform bearing the "Designed by Apple in California" digression. Underneath are a power brick, power cord, AirPort Extreme install disc, setup guide, access point regulatory certification card and warranty pamphlet. We'll have some additional details on the new base stations in the near future. In the meantime, enjoy our unboxing photos, below. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,010
|
aaaagh, its got a nasty ol brick powerpack. blah bleh yuck!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 402
|
I could probably justify the $179 price tag if it allowed me to stream my music but I can't. And is it me or does anyone else think the design is weird. Why is it so big? What's up with that crevasse all the way around it that's going to be a dirt magnet? Since it's so big, why does it need a nasty power brick?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
|
just wish it had an ADSL modem built in
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 262
|
This whole "Apple, Inc" thing must've come about very recently. I still see "Apple Computer, Inc." displayed on this hardware.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 293
|
Have you seen the competition? How is it weird ... I've got an Airport Express and still think it's great, but this one looks much better. Keeping it in size with the Mac Mini and Apple TV seems smart and overall it has a nice iPod dock aesthetic.
Quote:
The groove could be a dirt magnet though. But it does look good if you ask me, breaks up the boxy appearance with a contour and I bet the part above the groove is where the biggest antenna is housed. Heard about the Airport Express failure rate? Hardmac have good coverage. APX in 240 volt contountries especially have been overheating due partly to poor ventilation inside, which is also where their power supply is squeezed. Not good. Mine is fine probably because I live in a chilly environment, but Apple are smart to address such a defect. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 257
|
It'll probably be a while before this appears in Europe, the voltages here are off the scale.
And there's really no good-looking ADSL modem to match this beauty. Too bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: los angeles
Posts: 2
|
What about the wall mounting option? It seems to me Apple has left out this small option, which by the way, all the other routers already have it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15
|
IF it had GigaBit ethernet ports, I would buy two to replace 4 linksys boxes.
Sadly enough Apple still has its head stuck on fast ethernet. It just doesn't make sense. Gigabit ethernet is standard on their (and my) computers, but their only network box isn't. Apple TV lacks gigabit as well, come to think of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 43°38'24.13N 79°23'26.15W
Posts: 3,276
|
Quote:
![]()
"Many people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 20
|
Sexy
-Owl |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 24
|
I wonder if it's possible to boot-up a Mac using the networked USB drive as the startup disk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 48
|
now, the question: will they sell an 802.11n airport extreme card for things like my ibook g4?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pittsburgh PA, USA
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
I think i'll wait awhile before getting one, our Linksys router still works alright.
"Did your house just explode?"
"Its the most fun in the park, when your laughing in the dark." "You better watch yourself, or the Crimson Clown will get you." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Make Poverty History
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 2,572
|
I think this is a worthy replacement for the AirPort Extreme. However it should have AirTunes and an ADSL Modem to make it more attractive. If it's just a router it competes poorly with the likes of Netgear who make smaller Routers/ADSL Modems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 20
|
I'm surprised there was little to no packing/protection of the unit on top and sides. The photo seems to indicate just a thin piece of cardboard (top of the box) separates the unit from damage. You wouldn't want to bump it!
Nope, unless there's something via USB 2.0 or ethernet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 282
|
Quote:
Is the wireless and wired network layered (as in Wired then wireless is behind that) or are they parallel. I assume layered since they only use one IP. Paralleled is better for security (but ain't going to get into that). Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 18
|
My Airport Extreme 802.11n arrived 2 days ago.... and I live in *New Zealand*.... must be the first time ever that we get stuff this early!
Its working famously. Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 460
|
What do I miss about this? Wall mounting, gigabit ethernet (even for wan) , connections for external antennas, place for an Firewire drive (this is Apple, after all), a standard shape power brick (consistency) and a magsafe DC port.
It's really not worth 180 dollars right now. Activity LEDs are unneccesary, though. I do hope it's the same size as the Mac Mini, for stackability. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10
|
Size
Looks like the same size as a Mini
Which means it will sit on top of a Mini Stack Hard Drive. I just picked up a 320GB Mini Stack with a USB and FireWire hub in it so I now can hook this up to the APX and have a network HD and the USB hub to attack a Printer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 146
|
I am curious to find out if you can share multiple devices using a USB 2.0 HUB? If you have it, let me know if you have tried this. Thanks...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 146
|
OH... are they available in stores yet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 222
|
Yes. Apple's web site clearly states that you can use a USB hub to plug in multiple hard drives, printers, etc. with the new base station. This is a major improvement over the last one. Still, it would have been nice to get two real USB ports on there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
|
Just for those who are complaining about no external ant. port the reason being it would actually have adverse affects because of the way N works multiple in and multiple outs. So haveing a port would make it even less speed and less range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 7,036
|
Power converters tend to create a lot of noise. There are performance advantages to isloating the converters from the rest of the electronics. It would be nice if it were internal, but I can understand why it's not.
Cat: the other white meat
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Rev B, Bug Free
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,166
|
Too bad there is no external antenna port...for $179 I would at least like to be able to use a high gain antenna with it but still have the sleek Apple look as opposed to the Linksys style...
You can't quantify how much I don't care -- Bob Kevoian of the Bob and Tom Show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Rev B, Bug Free
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,166
|
so add 2 or 3 ports...most other N boxes have 2-3 external antennas...
You can't quantify how much I don't care -- Bob Kevoian of the Bob and Tom Show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
|
I don't think so, as I use the patterns as a quick way to help me check traffic / diagnostics.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
|
The "A" means asymmetric, not advanced. It only means one direction is faster than the other. It is pretty rare for a DSL service to not be not asymmetric.
Last edited by JeffDM; 02-04-2007 at 01:40 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
|
That wouldn't be unprecedented. I have bought wall-mount brackets for my Linksys gear. The units I have don't have built-in slots for screws, the bracket fixes that.
Last edited by JeffDM; 02-04-2007 at 02:54 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Legacy Code
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 5.25" Floppy Disk
Posts: 7,562
|
Good hardware pr0n. Now, speed test, speed test, speed tests!!!!11!!1!!!!!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Legacy Code
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 5.25" Floppy Disk
Posts: 7,562
|
Quote:
Also naughty ISPs which just support their standard DSL modem will wash their hands clean of any help for you if you are using a combo modem/router. Screaming "Just give me the damn WAN settings motherfrackers!!" down the phone does not help... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 282
|
I know that, but there is SDSL, etc, hence why I said ADSL and DSL.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
|
Inverted Restart Icon
I'm very much appreciative of the work (and the cost) necessary to have these first looks at the hardware.
Upon looking at these pictures, though, I'm confused as to why the restart icon (above the restart pinhole) appears to be backwards in some of these photographs. Specifically, I recall the restart icon being a white triangle pointing backwards. Not only is the triangle pointing forwards in some of these photos, it appears that the triangle is pointing backwards in the photos where that icon is not in focus. Have I gone mad, or is photo editing being performed? |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sussex, England
Posts: 2
|
Excellent pictures - they put my phototography skills to shame.
I like the design very much and want an 802.11n access point. However, I have a couple of questions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 1,105
|
Quote:
I went into PC World - and the number of ADSL modems for sale was precisely zero. (not counting USB types). There was an entire wall of ADSL / Wireless / Router combo boxes. C, |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|