AppleInsider AppleInsider Forums


Go Back   AppleInsider > General Discussion
Register Members List New Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-31-2007, 10:01 AM   #1
AppleInsider
Kasper's Automated Slave
 
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,153
Rapper Eminem sues Apple (again)

A dispute between Eminem and Apple Inc. has once again come to legal blows, with the Detroit rapper and his music publisher filing a multimillion-dollar lawsuit against the iTunes operator for alleged copyright violations.

Filed Monday in the U.S. District Court in Detroit, the formal complaint is the latest move by Eminem's music publishers to aggressively protect the rights to his music, according to the Detroit News.

At issue is is whether record labels have the right to turn an artist's CD recordings into digital music downloads on the Internet, or whether further permission is needed from the music publishers who hold the copyrights to the lyrics and sheet music.

Typically, Apple collects 99 cents each time an iPod owner downloads a song, with the company paying 70 cents of that amount to the recording label. The recording label, in turn, then typically pays 9.1 cents to the music publisher.

In their complaint filed Monday, Eminem's music publisher and copyright manager, Eight Mile Style LLC and Martin Affiliated LLC, allege that although Apple pays a portion of the revenues it collects from Eminem downloads to recording giant Universal Music Group, Eight Mile Style and Martin Affiliated have never authorized Universal to allow the downloads.

"Eight Mile and Martin have demanded that Apple cease and desist its reproduction and distribution and Apple has refused," the suit charged.

This isn't the first time that Apple and Eminem turned to the courts. In 2004, Eight Mile Style and Martin also sued Apple over its use of the Eminem song "Lose Yourself" in a TV commercial for Apple's iTunes music store. The ad, which aired on MTV, featured a 10-year-old singing the lyrics to the Oscar-winning track.

The suit was later settled out of court for an undisclosed financial sum.
AppleInsider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:13 AM   #2
waytogobuddy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 184
Apple: 30 cents
UMG: 60.9 cents
Artist: 9.1 cents

suing the wrong person much?

Eminem should have thought about his music rights before Universal bent him over.


Good for wikiLeaks
wikiLeaks for Good


Last edited by waytogobuddy; 07-31-2007 at 10:15 AM.. Reason: rithmatic
waytogobuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:14 AM   #3
icerabbit
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15
Why doesn't Eminem just dig a hole and crawl into it?

He certainly isn't doing himself any favors suing Apple for allowing iTunes store customers to buy his songs. I hope Apple & Universal pull the plug on him. Done.
icerabbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:18 AM   #4
mbaynham
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 531
as much as i like his music, why is he suing people if they are getting him coverage and making him money?


"i find that if you keep talkin', your mouth comes up with stuff..." Karl Pilkington
mbaynham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:25 AM   #5
roehlstation
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 492
So he's shooting himself in the foot....why, if Apple stops selling his stuff on iTunes, who is buying his music? People with CD players? Ummm...ok.

Lead, Follow, or get out of the way.

Heck, even Metallica is selling on iTunes now.
roehlstation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:29 AM   #6
roehlstation
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by waytogobuddy View Post
Apple: 30 cents
UMG: 60.9 cents
Artist: 9.1 cents

suing the wrong person much?

Eminem should have thought about his music rights before Universal bent him over.


Yeah, most of that 30 cents Apple gets goes right back into the cost of distribution, Apple doesn't really make that much on it. Eminem only had to record the thing once and just sit back and watch the money come in. Oh then pay his lawyers to sue Apple for entering into a completely legal agreement with the record label Eminem signed his contract with. Is he going to come after me now for listening to his music, or maybe for NOT listening to his music.
roehlstation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:34 AM   #7
britwithgoodteeth
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Posts: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by roehlstation View Post
Yeah, most of that 30 cents Apple gets goes right back into the cost of distribution, Apple doesn't really make that much on it. Eminem only had to record the thing once and just sit back and watch the money come in. Oh then pay his lawyers to sue Apple for entering into a completely legal agreement with the record label Eminem signed his contract with. Is he going to come after me now for listening to his music, or maybe for NOT listening to his music.
You should be a lawyer.
britwithgoodteeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:37 AM   #8
syklee26
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 78
there is no way Eight Mile just sued Apple only. I think they sued Apple AND Universal.

i can't see any culpability on Apple's end. Maybe Universal.

by the way, his music sucks. I am tired of his antics too. He is nothing but a bit more talented Vanilla Ice.
syklee26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:38 AM   #9
mstone
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 930
Quote:
Originally Posted by roehlstation View Post
Apple doesn't really make that much on it. Eminem only had to record the thing once and just sit back and watch the money come in.
And how many pennies do you think Eminem gets after his agent and publisher split up the 9 cents. Would anyone be surprised if he is flat broke? He's toast.
mstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:48 AM   #10
Flounder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lansing
Posts: 2,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by syklee26 View Post
by the way, his music sucks. I am tired of his antics too. He is nothing but a bit more talented Vanilla Ice.
I'm not a eminem fan, but I can recognize that he is talented, and about a million times more talented than vanilla ice


A good brain ain't diddly if you don't have the facts
Flounder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:54 AM   #11
roehlstation
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post
And how many pennies do you think Eminem gets after his agent and publisher split up the 9 cents. Would anyone be surprised if he is flat broke? He's toast.
If he's flat broke, it is his own fault, no one forced him to make any deals with any record labels, I'm sure Apple would be happy to pull his stuff off iTunes, then we can watch Eminem slip back into obscurity. I really hope the fans create some backlash on this as well.
roehlstation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:58 AM   #12
roehlstation
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 492
Eminem....the Draco Malfoy of the music business...
roehlstation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 10:59 AM   #13
Footloose301
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstone View Post
And how many pennies do you think Eminem gets after his agent and publisher split up the 9 cents. Would anyone be surprised if he is flat broke? He's toast.
Thats what I was thinking. Spending too much money on bling and bitches.

He ought to start pairing up with people like Akon or T-Pain since they're in damn near every song anymore.

He really can't be making much. Off a new hit theres maybe 1000-2000 downloads each day and then his older stuff is probably 50-100 downloads per day.... I doubt he's pulling in the big bucks. I know many of his downloads are coming right off of LimeWire or Acquisition


MacBook Pro 17" 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo
4GB RAM
160GB@7200RPM HD
iPhone 3GS (32GB/Black)
iPhone 3G (16GB/Black) R.I.P. 7/11/08~5/29/09
iPhone 8GB
iPod Photo 60GB
Footloose301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:01 AM   #14
ChevalierMalFet
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 448
Ahh yes, I forgot how much of a frigtard he was. Thanks for reminding me M.
ChevalierMalFet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:02 AM   #15
britwithgoodteeth
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Posts: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Footloose301 View Post
Thats what I was thinking. Spending too much money on bling and bitches.
If you're not 12 years old -- or retarded -- you should be embarrassed.

And why would you brain surgeons assume that he's going broke?

britwithgoodteeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:06 AM   #16
Footloose301
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by britwithgoodteeth View Post
If you're not 12 years old -- or retarded -- you should be embarrassed.

And why would you brain surgeons assume that he's going broke?

I should be embarassed.... why?


MacBook Pro 17" 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo
4GB RAM
160GB@7200RPM HD
iPhone 3GS (32GB/Black)
iPhone 3G (16GB/Black) R.I.P. 7/11/08~5/29/09
iPhone 8GB
iPod Photo 60GB
Footloose301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:14 AM   #17
britwithgoodteeth
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Posts: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Footloose301 View Post
I should be embarassed.... why?
Bling and bitches? Really?



You're like Pavlovian dogs, working yourselves into a lather whenever someone challenges Apple -- legitimately or not.
britwithgoodteeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:16 AM   #18
pixiegirl
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4
stock tank

Well it sure it screwing up the price of Apple's stock.

Pixie
pixiegirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:17 AM   #19
Footloose301
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by britwithgoodteeth View Post
Bling and bitches? Really?



You're like Pavlovian dogs, working yourselves into a lather whenever someone questions Apple's infallibility.
Still don't see your point except for the fact that you can't take a joke and that you're blowing things way out of proportion. Also, what I said had nothing to do with "someone questions Apple's infallibility." It was all towards Eminem, nothing more.


MacBook Pro 17" 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo
4GB RAM
160GB@7200RPM HD
iPhone 3GS (32GB/Black)
iPhone 3G (16GB/Black) R.I.P. 7/11/08~5/29/09
iPhone 8GB
iPod Photo 60GB


Last edited by Footloose301; 07-31-2007 at 11:22 AM..
Footloose301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:28 AM   #20
groverat
SYNNER
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: your mom's town
Posts: 10,832
Why is anyone angry at Eminem for defending artists against these massive corporate screw-jobs?


proud resident of a failed state
groverat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:29 AM   #21
roehlstation
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Footloose301 View Post
Thats what I was thinking. Spending too much money on bling and bitches.

He ought to start pairing up with people like Akon or T-Pain since they're in damn near every song anymore.

He really can't be making much. Off a new hit theres maybe 1000-2000 downloads each day and then his older stuff is probably 50-100 downloads per day.... I doubt he's pulling in the big bucks. I know many of his downloads are coming right off of LimeWire or Acquisition
ummm...2000 a day? Where are you getting those numbers? 2000 a day times 365 days is 730,000 a year. They are selling more than 2000 a day.

The Marshall Mathers LP sold over 20 Million Copies. if they'd all been sold on iTunes. at 9 cents a track 20 million times 18 tracks on the album times 9 cents comes to: $32,400,000

The Eminem Show sold over 20 Million Copies, there are 20 tracks on that for $36,000,000. If sold as individual tracks on iTunes.

Obviously the pricing structure on albums are a little different, but those numbers don't seem very small to me.

They also get a lot of advances from the labels and what not. Anything he is spending on alimony, lawyers, agents, the mob and so forth is his own doing.
roehlstation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:30 AM   #22
trevorlsciact
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by roehlstation View Post
Eminem....the Draco Malfoy of the music business...


Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalChan View Post
We need HOPE and CHANGE for these layed off employees... not just more of the same.
trevorlsciact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:32 AM   #23
shamino
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 214
This should be an open-and-shut case.

Who owns the copyright on the songs? Eminem or Universal? If Universal holds the copyright, then the case should be thrown out of court. If Eminem (or his company) holds the copyright, then both Universal and Apple are guilty of copyright violation.

If Eminem holds the copyright and Universal lied to Apple about ownership, it might absolve Apple of liability, but Apple would have to prove that. I assume Apple requires every content-provider to sign a contract stating that they hold the copyright on any provided content.

In other words, unless Apple was very stupid, Eminem's suit is either frivolous, or should be exclusively against Universal.
shamino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:35 AM   #24
Footloose301
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by roehlstation View Post
ummm...2000 a day? Where are you getting those numbers? 2000 a day times 365 days is 730,000 a year. They are selling more than 2000 a day.

The Marshall Mathers LP sold over 20 Million Copies. if they'd all been sold on iTunes. at 9 cents a track 20 million times 18 tracks on the album times 9 cents comes to: $32,400,000

The Eminem Show sold over 20 Million Copies, there are 20 tracks on that for $36,000,000. If sold as individual tracks on iTunes.

Obviously the pricing structure on albums are a little different, but those numbers don't seem very small to me.

They also get a lot of advances from the labels and what not. Anything he is spending on alimony, lawyers, agents, the mob and so forth is his own doing.
I was pulling numbers out of my ass. I was trying to guess per song not per album, but appearently I was off a bit to say the least, lol. I think of it this way, how many artists have filled bankruptcy? Including some of the larger groups like TLC that filled just months after a hit album. As well as Toni Braxton and Janet Jackson.

So you're saying its more like 50,000 per day?


MacBook Pro 17" 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo
4GB RAM
160GB@7200RPM HD
iPhone 3GS (32GB/Black)
iPhone 3G (16GB/Black) R.I.P. 7/11/08~5/29/09
iPhone 8GB
iPod Photo 60GB


Last edited by Footloose301; 07-31-2007 at 11:49 AM..
Footloose301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:56 AM   #25
roehlstation
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by groverat View Post
Why is anyone angry at Eminem for defending artists against these massive corporate screw-jobs?
You answered your own question, problem is, he's not defending artist's against these corporate screw-jobs. Draco, I mean, Marshall is looking out for only himself, you know he has another album coming out this year, this is a publicity stunt. and these Massive corporate screw-jobs are what makes him money. These corporations are the ones putting forth the risk, they are the ones that could lose massive money if he completely tanks. Oh Poor Marshall, grew up in tough times in Detroit, so what, so does a lot of people, none of them are millionaires.
roehlstation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 11:58 AM   #26
Wally
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by groverat View Post
Why is anyone angry at Eminem for defending artists against these massive corporate screw-jobs?
I think people are tired of Apple being pinned for something they aren't responsible for (it seems). If Eminem didn't "authorize" his music be sold on iTunes - when did he discover this? 2 weeks ago? Also, why is that Apple's fault. Apple doesn't buy CD's then burn them to put them on the store - they have a deal setup with the big labels. So if Eminem didn't "authorize" his music be sold on iTunes - then he needs to sue Universal.
Wally is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 12:01 PM   #27
reallynotnick
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 66
Oh cry me a fing river. If he does not want to make money take his shit off iTunes, it will make the store a better place and make him less money. I am all for that.
reallynotnick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 12:50 PM   #28
derev
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Olympus Mons
Posts: 44
A-Stock prices B Messenger Accountability

Quote:
Originally Posted by pixiegirl View Post
Well it sure it screwing up the price of Apple's stock.

Pixie
A) The stock prices are in flux because of everything BUT meminem (ie: iPhone battery issues, pending wireless auction may also bring platform sharing rules, class action suits aplenty, wallstreet analysts advice, etc.)

B) The story about memenem does not mention if their are any related lawsuits against the record label. If their are, then the Detroit News is acting biased by only reporting about Apple.


the rev
derev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 12:54 PM   #29
derev
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Olympus Mons
Posts: 44
confused are you, young padawan

Quote:
Originally Posted by groverat View Post
Why is anyone angry at Eminem for defending artists against these massive corporate screw-jobs?
memenem is not defending anyone but his own self.

These massive corporate screw jobs are still happening because we keep electing assholes and let them become puppets of the machine!


the rev
derev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 12:56 PM   #30
JeffDM
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by roehlstation View Post
Yeah, most of that 30 cents Apple gets goes right back into the cost of distribution, Apple doesn't really make that much on it. Eminem only had to record the thing once and just sit back and watch the money come in.
Making a song is a lot harder than that description lets on, and it's not cheap, particularly studio time, and it's not just one recording take, I don't think anyone is that good.

Quote:
Oh then pay his lawyers to sue Apple for entering into a completely legal agreement with the record label Eminem signed his contract with. Is he going to come after me now for listening to his music, or maybe for NOT listening to his music.
Yeah, the wrong company is being sued.


Last edited by JeffDM; 07-31-2007 at 01:03 PM..
JeffDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 01:11 PM   #31
madeincupertino
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: philly
Posts: 18
the reason why AAPL is down

the main reason apple is down today is because it has been rumored among some financial peeps that apple is cutting production of iphones (from 9 million down to 6 million).


as for this whole eminem thing as long as the music publisher is getting their 9 cents per song i dont see what the hell they are complaining about. that rate is statutory... there's no negotiations involved... congress sets that rate.

so they either get the 9 cents or they don't allow it and they get nothing.

pretty stupid if you ask me.
madeincupertino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 01:12 PM   #32
icibaqu
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 250
i'm impressed by how good you all are at missing the point:

"At issue is is whether record labels have the right to turn an artist's CD recordings into digital music downloads on the Internet, or whether further permission is needed from the music publishers who hold the copyrights to the lyrics and sheet music."

what form of distribution did he and universal agree to and does a different contract need to be drawn up to cover digital downloads. also, what did he relinquish in his contract with universal. none of which we know and all of which potentially makes apple a very liable defendant.
icibaqu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 01:17 PM   #33
roehlstation
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffDM View Post
Making a song is a lot harder than that description lets on, and it's not cheap, particularly studio time, and it's not just one recording take, I don't think anyone is that good.
.
Oh, i know that, my point is, they do the work once and everyone else handles it from there.

Also, that studio time is generally paid for by the label in the form of advances, especially after the artist has already made it big.



Can't say for sure who is at fault since we really haven't read the contract, but just knowing how other contracts go, how exactly distribution takes place is not generally covered.
roehlstation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 01:24 PM   #34
roehlstation
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by icibaqu View Post
i'm impressed by how good you all are at missing the point:

"At issue is is whether record labels have the right to turn an artist's CD recordings into digital music downloads on the Internet, or whether further permission is needed from the music publishers who hold the copyrights to the lyrics and sheet music."

what form of distribution did he and universal agree to and does a different contract need to be drawn up to cover digital downloads. also, what did he relinquish in his contract with universal. none of which we know and all of which potentially makes apple a very liable defendant.
But they don't start out as CD recordings, CDs aren't recordings anyway, they are simply digital files. Unless something is stated specifically as to how it is to be distributed there is no case there. Radio stations receive the files as digital files, they don't get CDs sent to them anymore. The question becomes, are there specifics involved as to how the distribution happens? Is it in the agreement?

Why is he the only one not thrilled to be distributed in this growing form? iTunes has been a blessing for so many, especially independents. I'm thinking he's just mad that Fergie sells more tracks on iTunes than he does.

Beware: don't sell your Eminem CDs at your garage sale, Marshall will be watching.


Last edited by roehlstation; 07-31-2007 at 01:37 PM..
roehlstation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 01:26 PM   #35
city
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bushie'sland
Posts: 302
Eminem should get a job if he needs money


Cubist
city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 01:27 PM   #36
Clive At Five
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 646
Quote:
Originally Posted by waytogobuddy View Post
Apple: 30 cents
UMG: 60.9 cents
Artist: 9.1 cents

suing the wrong person much?

Eminem should have thought about his music rights before Universal bent him over.
Granted, the monetary displacement unfair for Eminem, but that's not the right reason to sue UMG. His complaint is with UMG, e.g. they're allowing digital sales without Eminem's consent.

Apple should get a cease and desist letter from Eminem's lawyer... nothing more.

All this aside, UMG owns Eminem's music. They can do whatever they want with it. If you want the rights to your tunes, use a label you trust, or do what ever self-respecting successful musician does: start your own. He's a millionaire, no? I'm sure he could manage it.

-Clive
Clive At Five is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 01:27 PM   #37
pixiegirl
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by madeincupertino View Post
the main reason apple is down today is because it has been rumored among some financial peeps that apple is cutting production of iphones (from 9 million down to 6 million).

Yes that is the main reason the stock is down, the rumored iPhone cut back however that has already been said in the news there is no information to back that up at all and the stock isn't recovering like I hoped. As a day trader I'm intimately involved with aapl and pissed right now about this pull back. Oh well such is life.



pixie
pixiegirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 01:46 PM   #38
roehlstation
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clive At Five View Post
Granted, the monetary displacement unfair for Eminem, but that's not the right reason to sue UMG. His complaint is with UMG, e.g. they're allowing digital sales without Eminem's consent.

Apple should get a cease and desist letter from Eminem's lawyer... nothing more.

All this aside, UMG owns Eminem's music. They can do whatever they want with it. If you want the rights to your tunes, use a label you trust, or do what ever self-respecting successful musician does: start your own. He's a millionaire, no? I'm sure he could manage it.

-Clive
He has his own label, but that label isn't big enough to handle production and distribution. If he wants to control distribution, make sure it is covered in the contract, do it yourself, or go back to singing in the clubs.

The irony comes from someone suing for copyright infringement who's stage name sounds an awful lot like a world famous colorful chocolate candy.


Last edited by roehlstation; 07-31-2007 at 01:55 PM..
roehlstation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 03:02 PM   #39
Mitch1984
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Telford
Posts: 49
I like Eminem but it seems like he'd rather make money by suing rather than rapping.
Plus he should be suing universal not Apple.

I'm sure Universal would just say, well Mr Mathers, we want to do our own iTunes but them b@stards at Apple have an 80% share and the iPod. If we do own then we could afford to give you a bigger piece of the pie.

Universal are also onto Youtube when any of their clips go on YouTube. They are even gonna do their own youtube.
Mitch1984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 03:18 PM   #40
quinney
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: dit doe
Posts: 731
Quote:
Originally Posted by roehlstation View Post
The irony comes from someone suing for copyright infringement who's stage name sounds an awful lot like a world famous colorful chocolate candy.
Good one!!!
quinney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.