AppleInsider AppleInsider Forums


Go Back   AppleInsider > Mac OS
Register Members List New Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-05-2007, 08:57 PM   #1
AppleInsider
Kasper's Automated Slave
 
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,159
Apple set to begin testing of Mac OS X 10.5.1 Leopard, more...

Mac maker Apple Inc. is moving quickly to squash bugs in the inaugural release of its Mac OS X Leopard operating system. Meanwhile, O2 is bulking up on staff ahead of Friday's iPhone launch in the UK. And the presence of Intel Macs on the web out-shined those of PowerPC Macs for the first time in October.

Mac OS X 10.5.1 Update

Internally, Apple has begun passing around the first pre-release builds of Mac OS X 10.5.1 Update and plans to begin widespread testing of the software as early as this week, people familiar with the matter tell AppleInsider.

The maintenance and security update will tie loose ends left in the shipping version of Leopard and also aim to address several issues experienced by early adopters -- many of which can be found peppered throughout Apple's own Leopard support forums.

O2 boosts staff levels in prep for iPhone launch

Meanwhile, the UK's exclusive iPhone carrier is adding about 1,400 customer service agents to ready itself for the surge of customers for the Apple handset on Friday, the company told the Independent.

Half of the new recruits will fill roles in the wireless provider's Glasgow and Leeds offices, while the remainder will be in place at retail stores across the country. Just 200 of the new staff will be answering support calls, says O2's subscription services head John McGuigan.

The British firm expects as many as 200,000 iPhones to be sold over the holidays, prompting the surge in the workforce.

Intel surpasses PowerPC in web stats report for first time

Web research firm NetApplications notes that its October 2007 study is the first in the company's history to report a greater number of Intel Mac users than their PowerPC counterparts, with the newer platform accounting for 3.41 percent of all visitors to over 40,000 sites while the older systems represented 3.14 percent.

The 6.55 percent total is a slight dip from the 6.61 percent in September but represented a major shift towards the Intel platform.

About 5 percent of all users were running Safari while accessing the sites, indicating that most Mac users are not using Firefox or other alternate browsers.

EVE Online gains Mac, Linux support

EVE Online, CCP Games' highly popular player-driven persistent-world massively multiplayer online game, will be coming to the Mac on Tuesday (Tomorrow) as part of its Revelations 2.3 patch.

The software update will contain a number of fixes, but most importantly containsformal support for Mac OS X and Linux."



The Mac version of EVE Online has been developed by Transgaming using Cider, a translation layer that 'wraps' around Windows based games so that they run on Intel based Macs.
Access to the beta of EVE Online for Mac is currently available on CCP's test server 'Multiplicity' ahead of Tuesday's release.
AppleInsider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 09:17 PM   #2
josa92
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Far, Far Away
Posts: 191
"About 5 percent of all users were running Safari while accessing the sites, indicating that most Mac users are not using Firefox or other alternate browsers. "

I don't know about anyone else, but Firefox runs horridly slow on my MacBook... I prefer Safari more anyway. But this is off-topic, and i apologize for any grief this has caused anyone.
josa92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 09:19 PM   #3
Kolchak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,149
Have .1 releases historically come this quickly? I can't remember how fast 10.4.1 came out. This is so fast that I think I'll wait for 10.5.2 for the real improvements instead of just bug fixes.
Kolchak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 09:31 PM   #4
aplnub
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The kool-aid stand...
Posts: 2,188
.Mac syncing with iCal has been a pain.

Maybe they FTFFW (fire wall).

10.5.1 will be a welcome sight. I imagine it won't get much better until .5 when they have the problems behind them and they can add that one thing that us Mac users will cling to as the holy grail for 10.5.

Also, I think Tiger was released on April 29 and 10.4.1 came out on May 16th.


Hardcore.
aplnub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 09:35 PM   #5
Dr. X
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 58
To AppleInsider Staff, you left out a word in the short description.

The first line should say: Mac maker Apple Inc. is moving quickly to squash bugs in the inaugural release of its Mac OS X Leopard operating system.
Dr. X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 09:40 PM   #6
ThinkExpensive
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rhode Island (yup...it's a state...)
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by josa92 View Post
"About 5 percent of all users were running Safari while accessing the sites, indicating that most Mac users are not using Firefox or other alternate browsers. "

I don't know about anyone else, but Firefox runs horridly slow on my MacBook... I prefer Safari more anyway. But this is off-topic, and i apologize for any grief this has caused anyone.
I agree. Firefox used to be faster for me on the old PPC machines...don't know if there's a correlation there, but now I use Safari all the time. Firefox is noticeably slower.


ThinkExpensive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 09:41 PM   #7
smee
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 196
Quote:
Originally Posted by josa92 View Post
I don't know about anyone else, but Firefox runs horridly slow on my MacBook... I prefer Safari more anyway. But this is off-topic, and i apologize for any grief this has caused anyone.
I've tried Firefox on my mac, and it runs sluggishly slow, I can't stand it.
Safari is da bomb!

Can't wait for 10.5.1


Mac Mini 1.83Ghz Core 2 Duo with 2GB RAM, 80GB HD+160GB External HD
Running Mac OS 10.5 Leopard


Upgrade Your Mini Yourself!

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreyfus2 View Post
All wrong. Avon perfumes available from Apple Store. iStink shipping Immediately.
Lol.......
smee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 09:50 PM   #8
bsenka
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 345
I don't believe the Intel vs. PPC story for a second. There is no way in hell that Intel Mac use is even half that of PPC yet.
bsenka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 09:53 PM   #9
CoreyMac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 28
everyones saying how zippy leopard is. Once its loaded up it runs well....but I think startup is slower than Tiger was. Is it just me?
CoreyMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 09:57 PM   #10
EagerDragon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 318
Really looking forward to 10.5.1, I hope the stupid TM problem with backup of 2nd Mac over the network. Airport disk would also be nice, but shared drive is more important.

Fingers crossed
EagerDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 09:58 PM   #11
aplnub
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The kool-aid stand...
Posts: 2,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoreyMac View Post
everyones saying how zippy leopard is. Once its loaded up it runs well....but I think startup is slower than Tiger was. Is it just me?
Hard to say since I didn't time them but I thought 10.4.10 was a little sluggish on the start. My computer restarts faster and more reliably than Tiger did for sure. I think the SyncAgent and mounted disks' caused a lot of problems when rebooting in Tiger.

Maybe that is just me. But I feel Leopard is as fast if not faster.


Hardcore.
aplnub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 09:59 PM   #12
EagerDragon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoreyMac View Post
everyones saying how zippy leopard is. Once its loaded up it runs well....but I think startup is slower than Tiger was. Is it just me?
Feels about the same. May want to use sleep instead of rebooting all the time, a lot faster than reboot in either OS.
EagerDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 10:08 PM   #13
backtomac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsenka View Post
I don't believe the Intel vs. PPC story for a second. There is no way in hell that Intel Mac use is even half that of PPC yet.
I believe it. I rarely see ppc portables out in the wild(airports and coffee shops, ect). Almost all are intel Macbooks. See an occasional powerbook, but I even see more MBPs than powerbooks.
backtomac is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 10:17 PM   #14
ecking
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,564
I too use safari mostly, firefox is retardedly slow.


Apple Gear: Mini G4, Pro 2.66, MacBook(Alu)
iPhone 3G, Nano 4th Gen, Classic 120GB

Quote:
Originally Posted by appleinsider vBulletin Message
You have been banned for the following reason:
Three personal attacks in one post. Congratulations.
Date the ban will be lifted: 08-15-2006, 03:00 PM
ecking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 10:47 PM   #15
Delfoniq
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 92
Microsoft vs Apple = 0 - 1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CoreyMac View Post
everyones saying how zippy leopard is. Once its loaded up it runs well....but I think startup is slower than Tiger was. Is it just me?
Same here, IMHO starting up Tiger felt much faster. Leopard feels OK after its loaded up though. As far as the 10.5.1 update goes, wouldn't expect anything else from Apple. Prompt releases of 10.5.1 (and 10.4.11) would attract even more people that are still waiting for SP1 from Microsoft to switch to Mac OS X.
Delfoniq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 11:15 PM   #16
Bonsai1214
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
to be completely honest, i haven't had any problems at all with leopard thus far. but yeah, the bootup process was a lot faster with tiger. i could press the power button on my MB and get up stretch my back, sit down and it'll be at finder.

now i can go get a cup of water, scratch my butt, crack my back, sit back down and it'll still be at the default aurora background..
Bonsai1214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 11:33 PM   #17
NarutoSasuke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 39
I'm interested in knowing what type of machine you guys are running Leopard on? What about the amount of RAM? That's weird that it's slow, I don't have any of those problems, yet again I don't restart or boot Leopard up often. I usually just put my MacBook Pro to sleep.
NarutoSasuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 11:54 PM   #18
VL-Tone
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 88
There's one thing that I hope that they'll "fix" soon, maybe not in 10.5.1 but hopefully before 10.6.

While Spotlight in 10.5 is much quicker and more powerful thanks to the boolean operators and other new features, there's a big problem in the result windows: you only get the "name", "kind" and "last opened" columns, and there's no way to change that! I assume that they simply didn't have the time to add that functionality before shipping the big cat, but I sure hope that they plan on adding it.

This is really the only thing that bothers me in Leopard, I'm loving everything else.
VL-Tone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 12:26 AM   #19
wraithofwonder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A mile from Microsoft
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by josa92 View Post
"About 5 percent of all users were running Safari while accessing the sites, indicating that most Mac users are not using Firefox or other alternate browsers. "

I don't know about anyone else, but Firefox runs horridly slow on my MacBook... I prefer Safari more anyway. But this is off-topic, and i apologize for any grief this has caused anyone.
How much RAM does you MacBook have? I use/love Firefox on mine. Are you using the latest? Safari is the one Apple product that I'm sort of indifferent on.
wraithofwonder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 12:37 AM   #20
wraithofwonder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A mile from Microsoft
Posts: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsenka View Post
I don't believe the Intel vs. PPC story for a second. There is no way in hell that Intel Mac use is even half that of PPC yet.
It is not only that Intel Macs have been selling at an insane rate, but also you may be forgetting the age of most PPC machines and whether or not any of those machines would actually be visiting "modern" sites.

So one, there are probably considerably more Intel Macs than you are imagining and two, those with the newer machines are the most likely to be online visiting the most modern or popular sites while those with older machines may be killed by something as simple as flash, not even have broadband or simply don't go online as often.

I believe the report 100%.
wraithofwonder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 01:08 AM   #21
slicedbread
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 24
Why shouldn't Intel Macs be catching up to PPC?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bsenka View Post
I don't believe the Intel vs. PPC story for a second. There is no way in hell that Intel Mac use is even half that of PPC yet.
Why do you say that? In my household, for example, we had two PPC Macs, and now we have two Intel Macs. (We still have the PPC Macs, but we hardly ever use them anymore.)

Also, at the business where I am currently doing a consulting job, senior management has just replaced all their PPC Mac laptops with Intel Mac laptops...

I don't have the exact Intel Mac sales figures, but sales since the transition have been great (record numbers of Macs sold each quarter), so it wouldn't surprise me if Intel Macs really were overtaking PPC Macs on the 'net.
slicedbread is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 01:30 AM   #22
Bonsai1214
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
macbook intel 2.16ghz, 2gb ram
Bonsai1214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 01:46 AM   #23
ascii
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 791
Yay for 10.5.1. Please put the firewall back in Sharing where it belongs.
ascii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 04:29 AM   #24
Charel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 47
Fixing the DVD player behaving oddly in Leopard

I do hope they fix the DVD Player in Leopard soon.
It blocks and refuses to play disks properly. It cannot find the subtitles to show, and when you try to open features the pulldown window blocks with a turning fire ball and leaves you no option but to pull the plug and start from scratch.
I wonder if it is my problem or Apple's.
Charel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 06:09 AM   #25
Walter Slocombe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kolchak View Post
Have .1 releases historically come this quickly? I can't remember how fast 10.4.1 came out. This is so fast that I think I'll wait for 10.5.2 for the real improvements instead of just bug fixes.
Get it out quickly now and work on 10.5.2 for macworld ?? maybe ?? BOOM etc.


I don't see how an anti M$ stance can be seen as a bad thing on an Apple forum I really can't!

nagromme - According to Amazon: "SpongBob Typing Tutor" is outselling Windows
Walter Slocombe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 08:46 AM   #26
solipsism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,835
"About 5 percent of all users were running Safari while accessing the sites, indicating that most Mac users are not using Firefox or other alternate browsers."

The above line is whack. Shouldn't it say, "About 5 percent of all users were not running Safari..."
solipsism is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 08:46 AM   #27
JeffDM
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoreyMac View Post
everyones saying how zippy leopard is. Once its loaded up it runs well....but I think startup is slower than Tiger was. Is it just me?
Maybe most people don't start up that often?
JeffDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 08:51 AM   #28
solipsism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonsai1214 View Post
to be completely honest, i haven't had any problems at all with leopard thus far. but yeah, the bootup process was a lot faster with tiger. i could press the power button on my MB and get up stretch my back, sit down and it'll be at finder.

now i can go get a cup of water, scratch my butt, crack my back, sit back down and it'll still be at the default aurora background..
I shaved about 2 seconds off my boot time with Leopard, but my keychain is still broken (which didn't happen while using the developer builds). It's quite annoying and makes me want to go back to the latest developer build.
solipsism is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 08:52 AM   #29
JeffDM
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsenka View Post
I don't believe the Intel vs. PPC story for a second. There is no way in hell that Intel Mac use is even half that of PPC yet.
Why? Apple has grown considerably, getting 2.5M Intel units out in the last quarter when Apple was sometimes lucky to push out 1M PPC units out in a quarter.
JeffDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 09:04 AM   #30
JeffDM
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by josa92 View Post
"About 5 percent of all users were running Safari while accessing the sites, indicating that most Mac users are not using Firefox or other alternate browsers. "

I don't know about anyone else, but Firefox runs horridly slow on my MacBook... I prefer Safari more anyway. But this is off-topic, and i apologize for any grief this has caused anyone.
I haven't had any slowness problems, but 2.0.0.8 and newer seem to have a caching problem. After about two day's use, the program needs to be terminated and restarted to work again.
JeffDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 09:12 AM   #31
JeffDM
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post
"About 5 percent of all users were running Safari while accessing the sites, indicating that most Mac users are not using Firefox or other alternate browsers."

The above line is whack. Shouldn't it say, "About 5 percent of all users were not running Safari..."
I don't think "all users" means "all Mac users" but rather, "all Web users".
JeffDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 09:14 AM   #32
solipsism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffDM View Post
I don't think "all users" means "all Mac users" but rather, "all Web users".
Thank you. That does make more sense.
solipsism is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 09:23 AM   #33
JeffDM
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post
Thank you. That does make more sense.
I wonder if it does. I just realized that the statement doesn't consider the Windows users are running Safari, but maybe they are negligible in numbers.
JeffDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 11:37 AM   #34
Able-X
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffDM View Post
I wonder if it does. I just realized that the statement doesn't consider the Windows users are running Safari, but maybe they are negligible in numbers.
I'd love to use Safari on my work laptop if it's performance can catch up to the mac version. As it is now, it's horribly unstable, very slow, and VERY buggy. Needs ALOT of work still to be fully useable.
Able-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 12:29 PM   #35
kaiwai
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThinkExpensive View Post
I agree. Firefox used to be faster for me on the old PPC machines...don't know if there's a correlation there, but now I use Safari all the time. Firefox is noticeably slower.
When I had my 4 different PowerPC machines, it ran crap on all of them. On Tiger (on Intel) I ran Camino 1.5.x, and it was awesome, 1.5.3 has come a long way since I last ran it (recent Mac -> Windows -> Mac person, last time I used it was 0.9.x days).

Mind you, Safari 3.x has basically improved in all the areas where I had problems, Blogger/Gmail are now supported properly, I no longer need Camino.
kaiwai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 12:34 PM   #36
kaiwai
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by backtomac View Post
I believe it. I rarely see ppc portables out in the wild(airports and coffee shops, ect). Almost all are intel Macbooks. See an occasional powerbook, but I even see more MBPs than powerbooks.
True. I still see the occasional PowerBook, Trademe is chocked to the brim with people trying to off load their old iBooks and PowerBooks. I'm tempted to purchase an PowerBook for my brother, who is a university student (like me) for his Christmas present. Pick up a pretty decent one these days for around NZ$300-NZ$400
kaiwai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 12:51 PM   #37
Lemon Bon Bon.
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 761
Well, I'll go ahead and say it.

Great to have Eve ONline for teh Mac.

A game born for the Mac. I hope Cryptic use the Cider engine to port City of Heroes as well.

Not that I can't use Boot Camp...but a native version is nice...

Lemon Bon Bon.
Lemon Bon Bon. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 02:21 PM   #38
mcarling
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tiraspol, Pridnestrovie
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Slocombe View Post
Get it out quickly now and work on 10.5.2 for macworld ??
I would be very surprised not to see 10.5.2 by MWSF. I expect 10.5.2 to provide support for any new hardware announced at MWSF. 10.5.1 will probably be limited to the most urgent and easy to verify fixes with a release by the end of November.
mcarling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 02:23 PM   #39
aegisdesign
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by aplnub View Post
.Mac syncing with iCal has been a pain.
I don't know about .Mac as I've not got it but they've finally reconnected the sync menu bar icon with iSync again like it used to work in 10.3. Perfect syncing with my two phones (SE T610 and SE P910i) again without having to find iSync first.
aegisdesign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 03:19 PM   #40
marcfiszman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
Metaview

New Spaces preference in 10.5.1: Metaview
http://odelbee.com/2007/11/06/new-sp...1051-metaview/
marcfiszman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.