|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Kasper's Automated Slave
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,163
|
First builds of Mac OS X 10.5.1 pack over two dozen fixes
Moving quickly to address issues in the inaugural version of its Leopard operating system, Apple on Wednesday tapped its developer community to begin testing the first maintenance and bug fix update to the software, labeled Mac OS X 10.5.1.
The Cupertino-based Mac maker initiated the testing process by offering software developers access to Mac OS X 10.5.1 build 9B13, which weighed in at a hefty 267MB, according to people familiar with the process. Among the fixes already baked into the first test build are corrections to Leopard's application Firewall, Spotlight indexing, iCal syncing, Keychain login and text drawing corruption. Mac OS X 10.5.1 will also deliver a significant number of bug fixes relating to Leopard's email client, namely corrections to Mail syncing, HTML anchors, Email alarms, To-Do Notes, and smart mailboxs. In total, build 9B13 includes well over two dozen fixes and code corrections, those familiar with the software say, and addresses an issue present when moving files across partitions -- possibly one and the same with the widely publicized Finder data-loss bug. Apple has reportedly asked that its developers test the update broadly, paying particular attention to Time Machine, Mail, iCal, Back To My Mac, Bonjour, AirPort, gaming graphics, networking and the Finder. Mac OS X 10.5.1 is expected to be released within a few weeks' time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 709
|
Finally!!!!!!!! Took long enough!!!!!!!!!!
/sarcasm |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 407
|
yea! I think I will wait just for a few more dot releases before I convert over fulltime...
I did enjoy using 10.5 momentarily though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
|
Quick turnaround
Glad to see Apple is 'johnny-on-the-spot' with these corrections. But it does seem to point to spotty beta-testing of Leopard. So many fixes and most aimed at the highly touted features.
And Microsoft just announced they were pulling SP1 for Vista from it's beta testers as it's not even close to prime time. M$ expects to deliver those bug fixes somewhere around the middle of next year.... I guess patience is a virtue for Windows suffers, er, I mean users..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 379
|
good, but...
Come on, Apple, just fix the dock so you can use nested folders again and I'll put my name on a 24" 2.8GHz iMac...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,820
|
If you are not planning on using Spaces, you can replace the 10.5 dock with the one from 10.4
Apostrophes are simple - they are used to indicate either missing letters or possession. Missing letters take precedence. So:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 67
|
No fixes to dock
It's a real shame that Apple has chosen to ignore the SERIOUS problems with the "folder side" of the dock in Leopard, and has chosen not to fix any of these dock problems. Namely, the loss of hierarchical navigation in folders, the loss of folders' abilities to display custom icons (without a tedious workaround), and the ability to turn OFF stacks. Horrible changes which have made Leopard completely unusable for us and many others... yet Apple refuses to ignore these issues.
Not to mention the fact that all the "special folders" in the Finder now look exactly the same. Absolutely horrendous decisions from somebody at Apple... most likely Steve Jobs, who is not a power user of Mac OS X and is now catering the operating system to beginners by stripping away features from advanced users. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: $$$ A Slave to Rogers (Fido...) 3 year iPhone plan $$$
Posts: 72
|
I refuse to ignore this comment.
![]()
20" Intel iMac - Airport eXtream N - 16gb Black iPhone - Apple TV
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 357
|
Leopard UI: one step forward, three steps back
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 8,562
|
My EYES, the BRIGHTNESS is killing me!!
![]()
Collecting my SSD iMac Fry-die. :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 259
|
A bit much, doncha think?
Quote:
I for one am glad to see that - as you say - Apple refuses to ignore these issues. So we should see some changes any day now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 407
|
I for one HOPE they change the opacity issue with the drop down finder menus. Apple took a step backwards in regards to that. The menus are hard to read when on top heavy text windows or web windows etc.. Anyone else agree? I remember them changing early versions of OSX because people complained about it. 10.4 was nice in my book in regards to the very little transparency eye candy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: unpronouncistan
Posts: 62
|
Sorry, but I'm boycotting Leopard until a way is found to get navigation back in the folder side of the dock - I use this all the time on Tiger. Also the dock is vastly inferior in Leopard - from every point of view, design and look and functionality - the Tiger dock is more clear (I hate the blue orbs), the stupid shelf idea steals space from the display compared to Tiger, and the folders on Tiger are much more clear than the generic BS look of Leopard folders. Plus countless bugs in Leopard. No thanks.
Now, no doubt fixes, workarounds and 3rd party solutions will be found for most of these problems, so I'll wait for that. I'm very disappointed by Leopard. Bring on 10.6. I'll be in the market for an iMac next year, but I may just skip it if Leopard continues to be a dog instead of a cool cat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 2,698
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Melb, Aus
Posts: 65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 357
|
Quote:
Finder: In Tiger, the categories (Networks, MacHD, Desktop) were clearly separated, the icons are much bigger and easier to see. Leopard Dock: Don't even get me started. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 140
|
Yep, I need them to fix PPPoE over VPN first or I can't use it. Until I get an external hard drive (and they fix time machine) I can't install it anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,939
|
I'll probably upgrade to Leo when .1 is released and after I see how it is received by users here. Recently I was at the Apple store in Orlando and was able to play around with some Macs with Leopard. Although I spent limited time on the machines I liked what I saw. As far as the dock and menu bar issues, they seem overdoene to me. I had no trouble 'seeing' and doing what I wanted to do.
As soon as some bugs are worked out I ready. Does anyone know if there are any HP printer issues with Leopard? I've not read of any but all the printers I use with my MBP are HP. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 49
|
My personal gripes with the new cat...
Sorry to b*tch in my first ever post, but though you might be interested see a few of these, and maybe share tales of your own...
1. Inconsistent finder functionality. Yeah, coverflow is fun for about 3 minutes. I just get fed up of finder loading all of my icon previews as I scroll down my photo folders (seriously...why not read ahead. I'm using a 2.16GHz 1st gen MBP btw). But most concerning of all - enter one of your folders set to icon view and click through to one set up for list view. Now click the back button - wow! they've all changed to list view, even if you get back to your icon view folder. Not good. 2. Dock. Really rubbish. EyeTV used to minimise to a cool miniature live TV icon - now it's just a static image. Other folders minimised to the dock only freeze on the first picture and it's impossible to see what they're supposed to be. And no 2D/3D selection icon? Please... I was also hoping for the possibility to lose any background from the dock and just have icons 'hanging in space'. 3. Safari. Why can't i choose to have safari in tabbed browsing view all the time like version 2? I really hate having my screen jump down when I first open a tab. If it ain't broke - why fix it? At least make it a user selectable option. 4. Mail. Don't get me started. No option to download all my old mails from .mac, poor poor quality syncing. I can't even be bothered with the HTML eye-candy until all the rest of it's fixed. 5. Spaces. What, no separate backgrounds for each space? 6. Pretty much what everyone else has been saying. That's all for now - see if you find number 1 as annoying as I do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 144
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5
|
Airport
Almost 16,000 read the Airport thread on the Apple discussion board and almost 400 people posted issues with Airport under Leopard
http://discussions.apple.com/thread....95706&tstart=0 Does Apple choose to ignore it? Ever since I upgraded my MBP my Airport connection goes down periodically and the only way to restore it is rebooting. My iMac has been upgraded the same day and since then did not have any Airport issues... |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,564
|
Wow you need help to get off your crack addiction. Who'd want that?
Apple Gear: Mini G4, Pro 2.66, MacBook(Alu)
iPhone 3G, Nano 4th Gen, Classic 120GB Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 274
|
Quote:
Stick with Tiger if you dont like it. A lot of people like it and some thing just take time to get used to. How can you seriously pass judgment on something from only using it for such a short period of time. Of course when you use something that is the same for years and then switch its going to seem strange for a while. That doesn't mean its worse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8
|
That whole sentence made me shudder a little. I do not believe the loss of hierarchal folders in the dock is a good evolution, and i don't think stacks are superior. They're a neat toy, and a generally good idea, I do use them. I would however love a right click contextual menu (and of course a corresponding menu option), to disable and enable stacks on the fly. A "Make a Stack" checkbox so i can turn them off and on at will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 1,014
|
Leopard is awesome on both of our machines. Bring on the updates! Sweet.
Snow Leopard is awesome on my 13" MacBook Pro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 357
|
Quote:
Quote:
You must LOVE Vista. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 357
|
Thank you.
Quote:
Apple: FTFD! The D stands for Dock. Last edited by Neruda; 11-07-2007 at 09:05 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 357
|
Quote:
Can people actually have a cogent discussion on the pro/cons of an issue without resorting to cursing and ad hominem attacks? I don't like certain things about Leopard so I must be smoking crack. So anyone that disagrees with you is smoking crack then, right? If you really believe that than guess who's the one doing drugs. It ain't me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 416
|
Quote:
I don't have $1000.00 to shell out on app upgrades to make things work with the new OS, so I guess it's 10.4 for me for a good while.
Radio Tejas Do what you will, but harm none.
Last edited by chris v; 11-07-2007 at 10:07 PM.. Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
|
Complainers
I can't believe how many complainers there on here. There are always going to be problems with a new OS release. It is time to stand up and embrace change. Without change life would be boring. Change is the only thing constant in this Universe. Apple will take care of the problems. Out of all Apple's OS releases this is the best upgrade I have ever experienced.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 8
|
Wait for it
Call me cynical but I am so happy that there are those people who will jump on the first version of anything that rolls out of Cupertino. They get to do my troubleshooting and "beta" testing for me. Saves me the trouble. I had said from the time Leopard was announced that I would wait for 10.5.2 at least before buying. Looks like I was right.
“Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.”
- Walter Lippmann |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 657
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
![]() With FG it takes a slight bit of menu navigation after a right-click to reach a desired folder compared to being there immediately with the pre-10.5 Dock right-click, but having Finder Desktop and window backgrounds is a larger and easier right-click target (for me) than shuffling the mouse to Dock folders. Anyone bemoaning the loss of hierarchical Dock folders in Leopard should consider trying FG as an alternative. Took me about a day to get used to it (on Tiger; Leopard's not ready enough for me yet) and now the Dock access method seems obsolete (though still of value on systems without FG installed, of course). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 2,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 379
|
not quite
You obviously don't have thousands of folders nested eight or more levels deep and need to get in and out of them all the time. How would you do it? Let's see... click on a stack, then move the mouse and click on the first level, then move the mouse and double click on the second level, then move the mouse and double click... Get the point? Stacks are worthless for those of us who have this kind of workflow. (Spotlight isn't the answer either). And no, we will not "get used to it" in a couple of weeks. It's a non-starter, and why many of us who are wanting new computers now won't buy them until there is a fix (which could be as simple as Apple adding back in the old functionality).
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|