|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Kasper's Automated Slave
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,166
|
Latest Mac OS X 10.5.1 build fixes Finder data loss issue
Apple Inc. on Monday continued to pound away at its first maintenance and security update to the recently released Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard operating system, issuing a new test build to developers that fixes the much publicized Finder data loss issue.
People familiar with the ongoing testing process for Mac OS X 10.5.1 Update say the new build, labeled Mac OS X 10.5.1 build 9B16, was accompanied by a note to developers that specifically mentions a Finder-related fix affecting files that are moved between directories. It was widely reported earlier this month that Leopard's Finder is affected by a glaring bug in its directory-moving code, which could lead to horrendous data loss if a destination volume disappears while a move operation is in progress. Those people familiar with pre-release builds of Mac OS X 10.5.1 also added that the software update will deliver an enhancement to Leopard that will allow Apple's Software Update and installer applications to make revisions to application files which may have been moved outside their designated "Applications" directory on Leopard volumes. As was the case with build 9B13, which was released for private testing last Monday, Apple is reportedly asking that its developers test the latest build broadly, paying particular attention to Time Machine, Mail, iCal, Back To My Mac, Bonjour, AirPort, gaming graphics, networking and the Finder. Mac OS X 10.5.1 is expected to be released as a free update within a few weeks' time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 138
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 262
|
Quote:
![]() Last edited by lkrupp; 11-12-2007 at 05:44 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 942
|
Quote:
find / -name "Safari.app" -print if it is on the harddrive it'll find it. m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
I mean, isn't a pain to have to launch Finder and navigate to different folders to launch applications all the time? As opposed to just clicking and holding a labeled dock folder, scrolling to the application you want to launch, and selecting it?
It's a world full of people
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Somewhere far, far away
Posts: 2,858
|
Quote:
These people either a) don't share a computer with anyone else (have more than one account) where putting applications in the Application matters if access to those applications is important to all account, b) have some odd fetish of manually organizing things on their computer and prefer navigating their hard drive and hunt wabbits...errr, apps instead of putting the often-used ones in the Dock and using Spotlight to find the other ones or simply opening the Applications folder where apps *should* be. I mean, why not? Is it a crazy idea to keep apps in the Applications folder? While I agree that the ability to update apps that aren't found in the Applications folder should have existed in 10.0, I find people that micro-manage their apps and documents a bit crazy. Humans are mostly irrational. But some are ridiculously irrational and it's almost disturbing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 211
|
I'd be happy if they fixed the CD/DVD frimware problem that has rendered my 17" laptop useless to me.
Reads cd's and music dvd's just fine, but can't read any of the data DVD's i've burned. On the Apple Discussion forums, this seams to be a common big problem, so i'm not alone. FYI, Leopard on a 1ghz 17", 1gig ram, zero'd drive-fresh install... is slower then Tiger, still usable, but sags quite a bit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
I mean, I'm a fairly advanced user and so I know about symbolic links and whatnot. I don't like using Finder to launch apps, but then I also don't like having 100 applications on my dock, each of which has an icon that's about 10x10 pixels large so that they can all fit on the screen (like my wife does). So I know well enough to create folders with symbolic links in them, and then drag them to the dock as a way to organize. But this isn't something well documented or intuitive to the average Mac user. What would be nice is if Apple had something which automated this application organization process (aside from using Spotlight to search for apps -- which isn't the best way either if you don't want to use a keyboard just to launch an app). Maybe a way to select dock icons and create a folder for them? Or even just a way to create a dock folder from the dock itself so that you can manually drag and drop dock icons into it.
It's a world full of people
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in a strange land, waiting on my King to come and establish His Kingdom!
Posts: 259
|
I agree 100%. I keep all apps in the Applications folder so I can find the actual app file if I need to. I keep a folder on the Dock with links nested by function. It works great in Tiger (Stacks screws that up though).
Please click here to help add native TrueCrypt encryption to Pathfinder by voting for this feature in CocoaTech's Feature Suggestion Voting System, No registration required. Spread the word!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,006
|
Really? Could you please give me step by step instruction on how to do this? This must be simple, but I've heard this over and over and every time I drag my Applications folder to the Dock it goes *POOF*! Is there some kind of key+drag combination that I have to do?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 778
|
you really need to discover quicksilver or launchbar for application launching.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Van Isle, BC, Canada
Posts: 209
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 2,698
|
What I loved about NeXTSTEP in Networked environment, at NeXT.
All Applications were installed, on the Server which had the Directory exported into NetInfo and client systems mapped to to folder. We just dragged a link to the Shelf of WorkspaceManager.app or to the Dock and launched the executable using local resources, but having no applications installed to hog the drive system. It made for deploying updates much cleaner as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 834
|
I've gotten hooked on Spotlight doing this. command-space to open Spotlight, type the first few letters and hit return - its open. Also smart enough so the wor <return> launches 'Microsoft Word'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 248
|
Quote:
Command+space c o n <enter>... and boom, console is open. Last edited by Daffy_Duck; 11-12-2007 at 08:06 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,666
|
Physguy, the 70s called and they want their interface back...
Put down the command line and slowly step away from your tab-completion. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 268
|
Quote:
code: You'll get all the package contents, so you could then instead do something like: code: ...if you wanted to exclude the superfluous stuff. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 138
|
I can understand if you prefer to keep all your applications in one folder, but the nice thing about the mac is that they usually make things customizable for people who don't do things the same way you do.
I like to organize my folder into these groups: Applications, DAs (which shows hold old school I am), Internet, Games, and Utilities. Of course, I put my most used apps on the Dock, but when there was something obscure I needed, it was pretty easy to right-click the Applications menu and go to the sub-folder containing what I wanted before Leopard. In any case, I prefer not to be forced to do things any particular way. The more open the OS, the better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
For the average Mac user, launching applications that do not stay on the dock is a pain. - anef |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 885
|
Quote:
Getting rid of hierarchical popups from the dock however was bad. I used to use that feature a lot on my old G4.
Matyoroy!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
|
Launching Apps
Here is my doc organization scheme, and it works pretty darn well. I don't know if it's going to work in Leopard.
I keep almost no apps in my dock! Just the finder icon and the terminal. The dock is pinned to the upper left, just under the Apple Menu. All my frequent apps are in my Recent Items/Applications Folder, set to like 25 recent apps. Once they are launched they are in the dock... I pop open my Applications folder when I need an app I havent run in a while. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 8,564
|
My Eyes!!!!!
Collecting my SSD iMac Fry-die. :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: somewhere below the bible belt
Posts: 521
|
Quote:
Quote:
That is why I created a folder of aliases for all my frequently used apps and put that on the dock, which I wouldn't have to do if... Oh well... ![]() Still spotlight is the best way to access apps. And for the times that using the mouse is more convenient, I have my dock folder. ![]()
"Too much of a good thing is great." Mae West
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 8
|
Finder dock icon
Quote:
I honestly want to know why Finder is in the Dock - am I missing something?
Steve B
Powerbook G4, iMac C2D "Life's too short to screw with windows" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 8
|
I wonder if there's a fix in there for the weird permissions issues with windows shares?
Steve B
Powerbook G4, iMac C2D "Life's too short to screw with windows" |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 135
|
Aside from that bag of hurt, Mrs Lincoln, what did you think of the play?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 8
|
You can see some discussions here: http://www.macwindows.com/leopard.html#102907e
In my case I can see the shares but cannot write to them ("you do not have sufficient write pprivileges"). This only happens on my Leopard iMac, the Tiger Powerbook can write to the shares just fine.
Steve B
Powerbook G4, iMac C2D "Life's too short to screw with windows" |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
To put it another way, if I felt the need to have a dock icon to open a particular folder I can easily make it so. On the other hand if I don't need this functionality and my dock real estate is scarce I have no way to lose the icon. OK, I can also use the finder icon to navigate between open finder windows, but for me Expose is just as convenient.
Steve B
Powerbook G4, iMac C2D "Life's too short to screw with windows" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
However, I also _don't_ want to have to navigate through 100 applications in the Applications folder in Finder to find the one I want to launch. That _really sucks_. I also don't want to have to use Spotlight to search for applications. I'm actually not a huge fan of Spotlight because it can bog your system to a crawl at times when it's indexing -- so I often just disable it when I'm working. So, there are 2 options: 1) Drag all of your applications (or the Applications folder) over to the dock and launch using that. However, you still have the problem where you need to navigate through 100 applications to find the one you want. 2) Create a bunch of folders in your User directory labeled Audio, Video, Graphics, Office, Development, etc, etc. Then create symbolic links within those folders to the appropriate applications, then drag those folders to the dock. This doesn't require you to move any applications around at all. I choose #2. However, it's a bit tedious to have to do it manually (and isn't intuitive for the average user). Apple should make this type of dock organization easier to do (or provide some sort of easy to use interface for it).
It's a world full of people
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 248
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|