|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Kasper's Automated Slave
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,151
|
Briefly: More sightings of mysterious metallic grey MacBooks
As next month's Macworld Expo rapidly approaches, sources are reporting additional sightings of an unfamiliar MacBook model floating around Apple's Cupertino-based campus.
Most recently, a source described a "dark grey" or "gunmetal" colored notebook of slender proportions making the rounds in an area where Apple traditionally conducts stress tests. Though noticeably thinner but otherwise similar in size to the company's 13-inch MacBooks, the notebook appeared to have a metallic sheen to it, which set it apart from the current black MacBook. This most recent sighting seems to fall in line with earlier reports that a slender pair of notebooks were making their way around Apple's campus, clad in both traditional and black aluminum enclosures. Still, there has been no definitive evidence to link these sightings the company's sub-notebook project, which has been detailed (1, 2, 3) by well-respected sources over the past year and is due to culminate early next month with an introduction at the Macworld Expo in San Francisco. Additionally, it should be noted that sightings of particular colors and enclosures at Apple ahead of a product's release are not always fail-safe indicators of that product's final appearance. Apple is also likely working on more slender consumer MacBooks, which could at times be confused with the upcoming sub-notebook. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6
|
Metallic Grey Macbooks
It's about time for a redesign and to achieve a thinner Macbook aluminum would be a prime candidate. Annodized aluminum would alow variations in color that can distinguish Macbooks from Macbook Pro lines. I would bet that thinner Macbooks will drop plastic enclosures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 34
|
Unify MacBook and MacBook Pro line. Pleeeeease. Put them into Al.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 139
|
I suspect more that the Macbooks will start to match the colored iPods. Red anodized aluminum Macbooks all around!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 111
|
They were for 15.3" dawgs... a gun metal colour for MACBOOK PRO is coming, not macbook or the sub notebook... but MACBOOK PRO. I know this because I was there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 62
|
An all aluminum lineup though? I think that might start to seem a little dull. Although if they threw in black anodized aluminum, that might help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
|
Hi
I just bought a new Macbook last weekend!
I love the plastic encloure so the looks of the new line up its not going to be much of a concern. But, does anybody know if the new Macbooks are going to have more advanced techonology like an integraded memory card or a faster processor??? If it does i'm going to be sad ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 264
|
I think MacWorld will be a major Mac event this year. Unlike the 2007 event which focused on the iPhone, Apple will direct more attention to the Mac in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,792
|
Don't be so hasty to be sad.
There is nothing special available, hardware-wise, to make the Macbook so much more advanced than the one you have got now.Only open card is the graphics. But as of now, there is zero indication that Apple would move the Macbook to dedicated graphics so soon, if ever. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 246
|
Quote:
That is the great thing about buying technology: whatever you buy today will be faster and cheaper than whatever you can buy down the road! So turn that frown upside down, my friend, and enjoy your new mac. Spec-wise, it's all down hill from here!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,792
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
|
Thanks a lot fo all your help
I was already thinking of returning my Macbook and wait until MWSF but I won't ![]() Plus I really like it ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 585
|
This makes sense. Doing a (very) thin laptop in plastic is not very practical, it's just not rigid enough. Aluminium is stronger and dissipates heat better, a serious problem in this size.
Other practicalities mean that the following design decisions would have to be made for a sub notebook, if it is the rumoured 1/2" think, or about 13mm thick: - no optical drive, that's obvious. An SD or other card slot would make sense as removable media. CDs are going the way of floppy disks and flash is replacing them. - no removable SSD drive, but flash soldered directly to the motherboard. It makes no sense installing drive modules since they take up a lot more room and are just another component Apple would have to manufacture or purchase. Apple has huge buying power in flash chips and they would most likely have developed their own ASIC to improve read/write throughput performance for flash, which lags disks badly. I can see maybe a 32G low end and a 64G high end model. - a port concentrator, but not a dock. I think they might go with a single plug for external video, firewire, sound in and out and ethernet, maybe with USB on board in mini size. The prospective thickness of the bottom of the laptop, probably around 8 or 9mm would make having normal ports difficult. - no removable battery, or at least not as we currently know it. This may mean that to replace the battery you need to unscrew the bottom of the device, on a par with replacing memory. Apple have a history of limiting battery access for the sake of a few millimetres, I can't see this being any different. - the processor will most likely be a slower version due to heat limitations, but not the ultra-low power versions. Apple want to maximise battery life, but not at the expense of making a machine that is usable. A fan is a no-brainer. - the screen will probably be 12". 13" is more practical, but would make the machine less attractive compared to a MacBook. A lot of people in these forums have pretty wacky ideas of what is possible and practical and also quite often represent fairly niche buyers. Apple very clearly is going after large mainstream markets these days. That means no 10" 'ultra-portables', no tablets (although a larger iPod touch is probably on the cards) or hybrid models. Apple designs for what most people want and need, with the minimum of fuss or gimmicks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 423
|
It would make sense from a thermal standpoint. The aluminum may be almost a necessity if they shaved off thickness and increased speed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 72
|
Quote:
I just hope the sub MB has a backlit keyboard. Without getting flogged for the comment; i do a lot of typing in poor light and that feature would be great in all MBs. I would LOVE an Apple desktop keyboard with the same!!. Anyway, hoping the iPhone gets more storage and the sub MB is here next month. Diana Rein Putting the Soul back into Rock 'n Roll |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 246
|
Quote:
Perhaps Apple is experimenting with a new material altogether, like organic hand-milked spider silk, which is flexible and strong. Or perhaps they have decided to forgo solids altogether in favor of a gaseous exterior which would, of course, be even better from a thermal standpoint. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1
|
Sarcasm
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore's_law ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
Quote:
you can't just stop time and pretend that techonlogy isn't going to advance just because you don't want to have an obsolete computer or other hardware. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St Lawrence River NY
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
MacBones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Aiea, HI
Posts: 24
|
Spider silk would be light weight, strongest material they could use. It would not be firm enough to to hold hard drives, screens, etc. It would however be excellent on the world wide web.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 2,695
|
Quote:
Yes we always see incremental improvements in the area of GPU, CPU, HDD relative to Apple's previous models. We don't see the leaps of those three people seem to think Apple should add, but then again we tend to see stuff like GigE, FireWire 800 and 802.11n Wireless before the rest of the Industry. With the upcoming Penryn we all know the next versions of the entire Mac lineup will change, including the Integrated Graphics. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 8,557
|
Quote:
Steve Jobs didn't tout Multi-touch for no reason, the iPhone was just the first page in this rather large and revolutionary novel. First step, show MT to the world, in a way they can understand. Next, bring MT to the iPod. Third move, bring MT to the Mac. "Touch" is where it's at, and Apple knows it. This isn't just about a tablet for the sake of it, it's about changing the game forever. Apple's going to make it seem last century to use a mouse in the next few years, and the Mac touch will be our first real taster of that. I am so confident a device like this is coming out (before 2009 is over, and maybe even in 2008) that I'm holing off buying an Mac notebook for this reason. It's a bit like the time I said Apple was most definitely going to do a phone. It didn't take a genius to work out it was only a matter of time. Just like Apple doing a TV, the Mac touch is just a question of when.
Collecting my SSD iMac Fry-die. :D
Last edited by Ireland; 12-13-2007 at 08:25 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Panther City, TX
Posts: 54
|
As long as they figure out how to get them to run cooler but that might me asking for a bit much.
You are coming to a sad realization, cancel or allow?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 653
|
A brand new MacBook that I ordered for my wife was just delivered an hour ago. I'm setting it up now. I don't want to hear about new MacBooks since they were just recently updated to Santa Rosa. Whatever slim 13.3" notebook is being seen now will be a new MacBook Pro, not a MacBook. The MBP line is due for a major update which includes a new case design and Penryn chips. The existing MBP/PB design has been around since 2003. I got my 15" PB in September, 2003, and I want a new MBP with a new case and Penryn. Please, let that be introduced on Jan 15.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 38
|
But the public message is great. Apple is so green, when you're read to buy a new machine in two years your old one is recyclable because they made it out of aluminum!!!
The real irony is that Apple is moving back to a line of Grey Boxes - exactly what the Mac Fans have berated the PCs about for so many years... I say, but you're welcome to disagree, the color of the box has nothing to do with the performance of the machine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sol 3
Posts: 1,379
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Last edited by iPoster; 12-13-2007 at 08:50 PM.. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
|
this is ridiculous I asked a simple
question and all I get is a wave of sarcastic comments that actually makes me think you know less than I do |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 585
|
Quote:
As I said, you can have all the fantasies you like, but practical machines for practical people is a different story entirely. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 585
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: north of nowhere
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
Prove it. You are defining touch by apps based on previous UI constraints not multi touch methodology. Apps will become more visual, think Bento, Delicious Library. Even spread sheet apps could benefit. Btw graphic arts is one of Apple largest sectors. The mouse is NOT accurate. Spend some time with a Wacom Cintiq and you may see how the mouse is flawed. Btw apple makes the worst mouse out there. The mighty mouse scroll pea is a joke. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|