AppleInsider AppleInsider Forums


Go Back   AppleInsider > Future Hardware
Register Members List New Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2008, 10:47 AM   #1
AppleInsider
Kasper's Automated Slave
 
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,151
Intel to grow next-gen notebook chip offerings

Intel Corp. plans to extend its upcoming Montevina platform to include two new classes of chips that will allow system manufacturers like Apple to build a variety of new and low-power notebook systems, according to a published report.

Due to hit the open market in June, the fifth-generation Centrino platform and Santa Rosa successor has long called for four classes of notebook chips, including a high-performance X-class, a standard T-class, a low-voltage L-class, and an ultra-low voltage U-class.

However, DigiTimes in a report published Friday claims the chipmaker will tack on a new P-class for power-optimized energy-efficient high-performance notebook systems that will sport a thermal design power (TDP) between 20-29 watts.

Additionally, the publication's sources say the Santa Clara-based firm will also add an S-class of microprocessors which will include a smaller package size aimed at small form factor products. The S-class will further be broken down into three segments -- SP, SL and SU -- which will sport TDP ranges of 20-29W, 12-19W , and 11.9W, respectively.

Traditionally, Apple has adopted chips from Intel's T-class of notebook processors for its MacBook lines. Chips in that class currently have a TDP of approximately 35W, including an upcoming array of first-gen Penryn chips destine to make their way into the Mac maker's mid-Winter notebook lineup.

When it arrives in June, Montevina will serve as the foundation for the second generation 45-nanometer notebook processors detailed above and also feature a faster 1,066MHz front-side bus and support for DDR3 memory.
AppleInsider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 11:21 AM   #2
JeffDM
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
Is there really a need to have so many power grades? That's 8 steps between and including 10W to 35+W, whatever the X class is supposed to consume.
JeffDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 11:33 AM   #3
shanmugam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,196
everyone is interested to know when Apple starts using "E" series ...

disgruntled xMac user


13.3" Core Duo MB Black | 500 GB WD Scorpio Blue | 2GB RAM | 10.5.6 | Viewsonic VX2255wmb 22" LCD
16GB iPhone 3G
shanmugam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 01:22 PM   #4
zunx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 373
Great! Give me fanless bedroom-quiet Macs! Besides handheld Macs with full Mac OS X 10.5.1 inside.
zunx is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 02:57 PM   #5
heffeque
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Salamanca, Spain, Europe.
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post
and support for DDR3 memory.
DDR3 consumes less than DDR2 so... good :-)
heffeque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 04:00 PM   #6
NarutoSasuke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 39
Is Montevina the platform that Nehalem is supposed to run off of? I remember seeing some posts in all the CES news about Montevina, but I thought that was for MID and UMPC's... this is starting to get confusing since Intel has been branching out so much.
NarutoSasuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 06:51 PM   #7
TB6387
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by NarutoSasuke View Post
Is Montevina the platform that Nehalem is supposed to run off of? I remember seeing some posts in all the CES news about Montevina, but I thought that was for MID and UMPC's... this is starting to get confusing since Intel has been branching out so much.
If I'm not mistaken, similar to the the transition between Santa Rosa and Penryn, Montenvina is the optimization of Penryn, 45 nm, and Nehalem is the die shrink of Montenvina from 45nm to 32nm.
TB6387 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 09:13 PM   #8
mjteix
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Québec
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by TB6387 View Post
If I'm not mistaken, similar to the the transition between Santa Rosa and Penryn, Montenvina is the optimization of Penryn, 45 nm, and Nehalem is the die shrink of Montenvina from 45nm to 32nm.
Not quite.
Santa Rosa and Montevina are chipsets/platforms.
Penryn is the 45nm shrink of Core 2 XXXX.
Nehalem will be a new Core still at 45nm with integrated memory controller and more.
Montevina will support new penryn chips (1066FSB, new P-type voltage, new SP, SL, SU small packages, and THE quad...).

History:
Core Duo/Solo + Napa chipset (667FSB) *original MBP, MB, iMac, Mac mini
Core 2 Duo (64 bits) + Napa chipset (667FSB) *Merom MBP, iMac and later MB and Mac mini
Core 2 Duo/800 + Santa Rosa chipset (800FSB) *Latest MBP, iMac, and recenty MB
Penryn/800 + Santa Rosa chipset (800FSB) *Could be announced at MWSF (MBP, iMac)
Penryn/1066 + Montevina chipset (1066FSB) *Could be announced at WWDC (MBP, iMac, MB, Mac mini)
Mobile Nehalems will be announced mid-2009 with dedicated chipsets (new core & architecture) could be announced at WWDC 2009

Hope this clarifies a little
mjteix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.