AppleInsider AppleInsider Forums


Go Back   AppleInsider > iPod + iTunes + AppleTV
Register Members List New Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2008, 01:18 PM   #1
AppleInsider
Kasper's Automated Slave
 
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,151
Apple introduces new Apple TV software, lowers hardware pricing

Presenting at the Macworld Expo on Tuesday, Apple unveiled an all new version of its Apple TV software that allows movie fans to rent movies on the iTunes Store directly from their widescreen TV, and also lowered the price of Apple TV hardware to just $229.

With iTunes Movie Rentals and Apple TV, users can just click a button on their remote to effortlessly rent movies from a catalog of over 1,000 titles by the end of February, including over 100 titles in high definition video with 5.1 Dolby Digital surround sound, with no computer required.

DVD-quality iTunes Movie Rentals are $2.99 for library titles and $3.99 for new releases, and high definition versions are just one dollar more with library titles at $3.99 and new releases at $4.99. Apple will provide the new Apple TV software free of charge to existing Apple TV owners when it releases the new Apple TV priced at $229 in about two weeks, the company said.

"With the new Apple TV and iTunes Movie Rentals, movie lovers can rent DVD-quality or stunning HD movies from their couch with just a click of a button," said Apple chief executive Steve Jobs. "No more driving to the video store or waiting for DVDs to arrive in the mail."

Once a movie is rented, it starts downloading from the iTunes Store directly to Apple TV, and users with a fast Internet connection can start viewing the movie in seconds. Customers have up to 30 days to start watching it, and once a movie has been started customers have 24 hours to finish it -- or watch it multiple times.
With Apple TV, users can also view photos from their computers, Flickr and .Mac Web Galleries on their widescreen TV as slideshows or screen savers, and anytime photos are updated on Flickr or .Mac, they are automatically updated on Apple TV.

Apple TV users can now also browse and enjoy the iTunes Store podcast directory of over 125,000 video and audio podcasts, view over 50 million originally created videos from YouTube or choose from a selection of six million songs, over 600 TV shows and 10,000 music videos to purchase directly from their Apple TV. Purchases downloaded to Apple TV are automatically synced back to iTunes on the user's computer for playback on their computer, all current generation iPods or the iPhone.

Apple TV easily connects to a broad range of widescreen TVs and home theater systems and comes standard with HDMI, component video, analog and optical audio ports. Using high-speed AirPort 802.11 wireless networking, Apple TV now automatically plays all of your iTunes content without setup or management.

Pricing & Availability

The new Apple TV software will be available as a free automatic download to all Apple TV customers later this month. Apple TV, which includes the Apple Remote, is available from the Apple Store, Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers for a suggested retail price of $229 (US) for the 40GB model and $329 (US) for the 160GB model (US and Canada). Apple TV requires an 802.11g/n wireless network or 10/100 Base-T Ethernet networking, a broadband Internet connection and a high definition widescreen TV. iPod games will not play on Apple TV. iTunes Movie Rentals are available in the US only.
AppleInsider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 01:22 PM   #2
Fishyesque
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 709
Wow! I'm impressed with your speed!

lol Bravo.
Fishyesque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 01:23 PM   #3
pmjoe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 562
If Apple had upped the specs on this to handle 1080p playback and/or opened it up to developers, I'd be interested ... as it is, I'm leaning toward getting a PlayStation III for media playback.

That said, these improvements should boost Apple TV sales a bunch.
pmjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 01:25 PM   #4
ronster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 77
No Apple TV hardware announcements?
ronster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 01:46 PM   #5
macshark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 120
The new AppleTV 2 specs on Apple.com says it is compatible with Plasma/LCD TVs with 1080i/1080p resolution.

Supported video resolution still seem to top out at 720P. Does this mean that:
  • Apple TV 2 can display photos in 1080p resolution?
  • Apple TV 2 can upscale 480p/720p content to 1080p?
macshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 01:50 PM   #6
hmurchison
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,457
Folks

720p looks fine provided you're not running 50+ inches. I've only got an LCD that displays 1366x768 and some HD DVD movies look stunning.

Don't get caught up on the specs just yet. We've got rental access now, surround sound and a lower price. I'd take that over the illogical calls for adding Blu-ray or DVD drives to the thing.

I'll be buying my first tv in a month or two.


Mac mini - 2 , iPod Nano- 1
G4 Cube - 5 , iPod Shuffle -1
Bloggity Blog
hmurchison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 01:54 PM   #7
macshark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmurchison View Post
Folks

720p looks fine provided you're not running 50+ inches. I've only got an LCD that displays 1366x768 and some HD DVD movies look stunning.

Don't get caught up on the specs just yet. We've got rental access now, surround sound and a lower price. I'd take that over the illogical calls for adding Blu-ray or DVD drives to the thing.

I'll be buying my first tv in a month or two.
720P looks fine for movies, but displaying photos at 720p on a 52" 1080p screen doesn't look nearly as good. Something to do with how the human eye can resolve static images vs motion. I am more interested in the Apple TV as a way to keep my photos and music more accessible in the living room. At almost $200, it is probably the best solution for serving photos and music out there even if one were not to use its movie features at all...
macshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:06 PM   #8
suhail
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 190
These are great enhancements however, I did not like that I only get 24hrs to watch the whole movie after I start playing it, they should've made that to be at-least 48 hrs. I may start playing it to see the quality or to see if it downloaded properly, heck I may start playing it by mistake.
Anywho, I'm glad I don't have to buy a new Atv
suhail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:06 PM   #9
GQB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 728
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmjoe View Post
If Apple had upped the specs on this to handle 1080p playback and/or opened it up to developers, I'd be interested ... as it is, I'm leaning toward getting a PlayStation III for media playback.

That said, these improvements should boost Apple TV sales a bunch.
1080p is a waste of money for most consumers. Apple is right to not chase the diminishing returns point that's been reached in video quality.
GQB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:07 PM   #10
LouisTheXIV
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16
So about this new MacBook Air....do people think we will be able to swap the 80gig HD for a 160 1.8? Or are we stuck with that paltry HD??

Can we upgrade to 4 gigs of RAM???
LouisTheXIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:12 PM   #11
teckstud
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,115
HD movie rentals only? No HD for sale? Not good.
If you can buy or rent a regular movie you should be able to do the same for HD.
teckstud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:13 PM   #12
emig647
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,055
I don't agree with you guys about 1080p having diminishing returns. You can clearly see a detail difference between 720p streams and 1080p streams on my 42" 1080 Plasma. You can try this yourself by getting a 1080p DVI->HDMI adapter and running 720p and 1080p streams on your mac to your computer. Or you can take a PS3 and a good quality blu-ray (ratatouille) and force your ps3 to display as 720p or 1080p. There is clearly a detail difference even at 7 feet back.

While I agree that distributing 1080p over itunes doesn't make a ton of sense... I don't agree to limit Apple TV's playback. I for one would much rather have a refurbished Intel Mac mini for another 250 and stream all my videos to it. Perhaps hook up a terabyte drive and rip all my dvds to it and use DVDPedia to play them from a library selection. AppleTV internals haven't changed in a year. Sad.

Wrong thread Louis.


We all want things we can't have... So go to http://www.stuffspace.com!
emig647 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:14 PM   #13
teckstud
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmurchison View Post
Folks

720p looks fine provided you're not running 50+ inches. I've only got an LCD that displays 1366x768 and some HD DVD movies look stunning.

Don't get caught up on the specs just yet. We've got rental access now, surround sound and a lower price. I'd take that over the illogical calls for adding Blu-ray or DVD drives to the thing.

I'll be buying my first tv in a month or two.
HDTV is all about specs. And you still can't buy HD movies.
teckstud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:14 PM   #14
Lifino
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 38
So, 24 hours after start. But does it self destruct after viewing once?

I know my kids will watch Monster's Inc. 25 times durring the three days we have it from Blockbuster. Sure that's over three days, but they will watch the same movie 4-5 times in a day, if I let them. Even my 10 year old will watch Harry Potter 3 times in a day, again, when she's allowed...

And what about my own dumb self? I hit play, and an hour later I'm asleep. I usually don't stop the movie as I have fallen asleep... If I fall asleep at the rental do I miss out on what I slept through?


Just wondering...

Honestly I was hoping Apple would update the hardware. My Father-in-Law has the AppleTV, if he had to upgrade to the new bit of tech I'd get first dibs at the old Apple TV, for free! Sure no rentals, but it gets my music and pictures into the living room really easy...
Lifino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:15 PM   #15
bambuhiphop
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 15
New Apple TV

I have to say I am a little disappointed with this update. It dosen't make a lot of sense for me to rent from iTunes as Blockbuster and Netflix are far cheaper when you get 10 movies a month. I was hoping for a subscription based rental I suppose. I am glad to see some progress forward but I don't think I will not pull the trigger just yet. Personally I would like to see the external USB superdrive that you can get with the Macbook air usable for the Apple TV for those of us who still have a large DVD library and do not want to rip them. I am well aware that this does not fit into Apple's "Business Model" but if they did that they would get more people using this device which in turn, I think, would get people into the new rental service.
bambuhiphop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:21 PM   #16
teckstud
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,115
NO web browser for Apple TV.
Oh well I guess that would have cut into computer sales. And it would have been so easy to add Safari to it.
teckstud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:21 PM   #17
SpinDrift
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 653
Ace, a free update to my Apple TVs!
SpinDrift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:21 PM   #18
Cory Bauer
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 861
HD Movie Rentals

Well done, Apple. Well done. HD Movie rentals with 5.1 surround, a fair price, and support from all major studios. The Apple TV is suddenly relevant.
Cory Bauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:26 PM   #19
OriginalMacRat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 157
22" MacBook Pro

I was hoping for a 22" MacBook Pro.
OriginalMacRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:29 PM   #20
dancm2000
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 81
I just wish it would have been opened up to 3rd party tuners and dvrs. That would have made it a sweet set top box for us free over the air hd folks. Looks like I'm gonna be stuck with a MacMini. But even the Mini doesnt have HDMI out like some other OS's machines. Apple has all the sweet ways to interact with media, but they never quite go all the way.
dancm2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:31 PM   #21
G_Warren
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 682
Seems Apple is intent on ripping of UK consumers though. £199 when it is now only $229? I think someone at Apple needs to check the currency calculator - they haven't lowered the price at all here.


Blocksoft - donationware and shareware for OS X.
G_Warren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:33 PM   #22
johnmcboston
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 108
OK, here's an odd thought. With AppleTV getting more and more functionality, and connecting to your TV screen... Add a web browser and bluetooth for a wireless keyboard, and you now have a computer that my Mom could use. now THAT would generate a sale.
johnmcboston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:33 PM   #23
macshark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambuhiphop View Post
I have to say I am a little disappointed with this update. It dosen't make a lot of sense for me to rent from iTunes as Blockbuster and Netflix are far cheaper when you get 10 movies a month. I was hoping for a subscription based rental I suppose. I am glad to see some progress forward but I don't think I will not pull the trigger just yet. Personally I would like to see the external USB superdrive that you can get with the Macbook air usable for the Apple TV for those of us who still have a large DVD library and do not want to rip them. I am well aware that this does not fit into Apple's "Business Model" but if they did that they would get more people using this device which in turn, I think, would get people into the new rental service.
Agreed. Unless Apple plans to offer a $20/month service that lets you rent as many movies as you want, the current $2.99/3.99/4.99 per 24-hour viewing period option would be quite non-competitive against the likes of NetFlix....
macshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:41 PM   #24
bensin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Very disappointing MacWorld

The only thing i can say is they're probably setting up for bigger and better things.
I was really hoping to hear about releasing a web browser for AppleTV.
bensin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:43 PM   #25
JLL
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by macshark View Post
The new AppleTV 2 specs on Apple.com says it is compatible with Plasma/LCD TVs with 1080i/1080p resolution.

Supported video resolution still seem to top out at 720P. Does this mean that:
  • Apple TV 2 can display photos in 1080p resolution?
  • Apple TV 2 can upscale 480p/720p content to 1080p?
AFAIK the existing Apple TV has no problems showing photos at 1920x1080.

It's video that's tied to the 720p max resolution.


JLL

95% percent of the boat is owned by Microsoft, but the 5% Apple controls happens to be the rudder!
JLL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:45 PM   #26
backtomac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmurchison View Post
Folks

720p looks fine provided you're not running 50+ inches. I've only got an LCD that displays 1366x768 and some HD DVD movies look stunning.

Don't get caught up on the specs just yet. We've got rental access now, surround sound and a lower price. I'd take that over the illogical calls for adding Blu-ray or DVD drives to the thing.

I'll be buying my first tv in a month or two.
They took your advice Murch. Almost everything you said in the other thread.

I'm still not sure that it'll be a winner, but it is much more appealing. What download speeds are necessary in order to rent these HD movies?
backtomac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:47 PM   #27
bambuhiphop
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by macshark View Post
Agreed. Unless Apple plans to offer a $20/month service that lets you rent as many movies as you want, the current $2.99/3.99/4.99 per 24-hour viewing period option would be quite non-competitive against the likes of NetFlix....

I mean, hell. Even if they added the functionality to be able to use the new Air Disk feature, OS X is OS X right?, they would gain huge market share a lot like the current ipod market. It seems in the video realm that they are using the itunes to drive video sales and rental. On the music side it is the hardware (ipods) that drive music sales on itunes. With Amazon coming up in the world Apple still is selling ipods. Do that with video, huh! Gain that extra market share in terms of hardware sale by opening up the hardware to pull those Netflix, Blockbuster, PS3, xbox, blu-ray consumers over to your product and then tie them into iTunes. They did it with audio! I understand that the Apple TV is ahead of its time and is trying to get people away from physical media but the fact of the matter is that there is still a large group of people with physical media. Get them into this and then transition them to your model. Sorry for the rant.
bambuhiphop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:52 PM   #28
teckstud
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory Bauer View Post
Well done, Apple. Well done. HD Movie rentals with 5.1 surround, a fair price, and support from all major studios. The Apple TV is suddenly relevant.
Purchasing HD would have made it relevant. As is- it's adequate.
teckstud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 02:58 PM   #29
Cory Bauer
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by teckstud View Post
Purchasing HD would have made it relevant. As is- it's adequate.
People will spend $3-$5 to rent a digital movie, but they won't spend $10-$20 to buy a digital copy they can't play anywhere else and have to be responsible for archiving. That's the reason we have a rental system today, instead of the purchase-to-own system that wasn't working.
Cory Bauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 03:06 PM   #30
Vox Barbara
grain of truth
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: mull over
Posts: 1,891
Gorgeous piece of technology, I have to say. I'm just awaiting the announcement of Movie rentals in Europe,
and than I'll purchase this beauty, immediately.


" I will not commit anything to memory that I can get from another source . . . "
ALBERT EINSTEIN
Vox Barbara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 03:14 PM   #31
musterion
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3
The AppleTV box has component (RGB) outs on the back. Can you only get 480p from these?
musterion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 03:14 PM   #32
Bancho
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 1,165
Ignoring Netflix online viewing capability I still believe Netflix dominates the aTV in quality, available catalog and usability. The aTV wins for instant access (vs. a couple days turnaround for Netflix).

I'll wait and see if they show the mini any loving in the next couple months. Otherwise I'll look at other solutions. Obviously the aTV is not what I'm looking for.

For those that want what the aTV offers I'm happy for you. It's an interesting device in a nice form factor.

hmm...

Maybe if that superdrive add-on for the Macbook Air was a viable accessory for the aTV...


"'Cause I'm the god of destruction, that's why!" - Susano Orbatos, Orion
Bancho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 03:17 PM   #33
Bishop of Southwark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by G_Warren View Post
Seems Apple is intent on ripping of UK consumers though. £199 when it is now only $229? I think someone at Apple needs to check the currency calculator - they haven't lowered the price at all here.
And we don't get movies....


It's what I do.
Bishop of Southwark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 03:24 PM   #34
Kishan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 661
Quote:
Originally Posted by musterion View Post
The AppleTV box has component (RGB) outs on the back. Can you only get 480p from these?
On my current ATV, I can get a max of 1080i out of the component cables. My HDTV is capable of 1080i only, so I run at 720p with excellent results.
Kishan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 03:28 PM   #35
Bancho
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 1,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory Bauer View Post
Well done, Apple. Well done. HD Movie rentals with 5.1 surround, a fair price, and support from all major studios. The Apple TV is suddenly relevant.
Apparently not all HD movies will have 5.1 surround according to Gizmodo.


"'Cause I'm the god of destruction, that's why!" - Susano Orbatos, Orion
Bancho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 03:32 PM   #36
musterion
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kishan View Post
On my current ATV, I can get a max of 1080i out of the component cables. My HDTV is capable of 1080i only, so I run at 720p with excellent results.
Thanks, This makes it very attractive to me, as I'm an early adopter--I bought a floor model of a 30" Tube Samsung before HDMI came out.

How big is your TV and what is the diff in visual quality to you between 720p and 1080i ?
musterion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 03:40 PM   #37
nofear1az
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 123
I can now say the AppleTV is more appealing than it was yesterday. no computer required, movie rentals, and a nice easy user interface for selecting movies. Nice touch. Glad Apple made these changes.

Yes, I agree, I think a subscription model would have been nice to see too but I'll take what I can get.

I think I just might actually get one now....
nofear1az is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 03:43 PM   #38
Nicnac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 54
am I the only one to get that Steve Jobs said there was a software update for existing Apple TV owners and NEW hardware in 2 weeks from the Apple store? Everyone here seems to be saying this update is software only.
Nicnac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 03:44 PM   #39
aegisdesign
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by G_Warren View Post
Seems Apple is intent on ripping of UK consumers though. £199 when it is now only $229? I think someone at Apple needs to check the currency calculator - they haven't lowered the price at all here.
Nope they haven't. And we still haven't got any movies at all to buy never mind rent them.
aegisdesign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 03:46 PM   #40
SpamSandwich
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by teckstud View Post
HD movie rentals only? No HD for sale? Not good.
If you can buy or rent a regular movie you should be able to do the same for HD.
I guess that's the deal with the devil... er, I mean studios they had to settle on. Of course, if you want to run out and buy a BD players and discs, you can still do that.


"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."
—Thomas Jefferson


Proud AAPL stock owner.
SpamSandwich is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.