|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Kasper's Automated Slave
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,151
|
Motorola may bow out of cellphones, aid Apple and rivals
After struggling for years to regain the success it had with the RAZR, Motorola may soon quit the cellphone industry altogether, according to research by a Nomura investment analyst.
Richard Windsor of the London-based firm explains that an investigation suggests Motorola would drop the segment entirely and instead focus on its enterprise and government sectors. Talks of a Chinese takeover, however, are an "old chestnut" that isn't likely to come true unless a buying firm knows how to mend Motorola's business, the analyst says. Instead, the American company is most likely to become profitable only after enduring a "very difficult" 2008. Motorola is already said to be suffering, and in the fourth calendar quarter of 2007 reported a 38 percent drop in its mobile device sales compared to the same period a year ago -- a stark contrast to an industry widely agreed to be growing over time. The departure of Ed Zander from Motorola's chief executive spot in mid-quarter is understood to have been partly driven by the increasingly poor results. Most of the reasons behind the plummeting welfare of the Motorola division are understood to stem from its emphasis on individual devices. By ignoring software and the platform as a whole, Motorola has essentially given Nokia a two-year lead, Windsor says. The researcher sees this as a trend for other handset makers as well. Other leading cellphone designers such as Samsung and Sony-Ericsson are also expected to prey on Motorola's vulnerability. Though still small, Apple has also been cited in industry surveys as stealing marketshare and perceived influence from Motorola with the iPhone. For Apple, a Motorola departure would only serve to vindicate its decision to create its own handset. The failure of the ROKR E1 music phone in both its awkward hardware and feature-limited iTunes software were reportedly frustrating enough to Apple head Steve Jobs that he launched an end-run around Motorola, discussing an Apple-made phone with Cingular (now AT&T) even before the ROKR reached store shelves. Since then, Motorola has continued to develop the ROKR line on its own with different music software; an eighth generation, the E8, was announced at the Consumer Electronics Show this month. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 92
|
No way! Is this guy for real?
And I say, soon man is going to land in the moon! ![]() I do, however, see a buyout from Apple being possible! Imagine how beneficial will be for Apple if all those experienced Motorola engineers start working on the iPhone. Last edited by Delfoniq; 01-29-2008 at 06:16 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 728
|
I wish someone would tell me what it was that made the RAZR at all successful? Simply the fact that it had the good fortune to come out before there was an iPhone to compare it to?
I've been stuck with my corporate RAZR POS for the past year, and if that's the ultimate in what Motorola can accomplish, then they can't get out of the handset business quick enough. Last edited by GQB; 01-29-2008 at 06:42 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Van Isle, BC, Canada
Posts: 208
|
good riddance
This would be a good thing. Clean house, get a fresh perspective. Quit beating a dead horse. I think they finally see the light that years in the business does not equal leadership in the business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Van Isle, BC, Canada
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 207
|
O_O They are everywhere! Literally! Almost like AOL CDs in the 90's, open a magazine, like three of em fall out.
I'm exaggerating obviously, but really, like everyone has one or two of em. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 267
|
Actually, I really like my RAZR. But then again, my previous phone ran Windows Mobile, and I'd rather go back to using a tin can and string than use that crappy thing again. Nothing like having to reboot my phone at least once a day just to make a call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
That's how you crush a brand, take 2 years to improve your product line. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 267
|
Quote:
Obviously my first mobiles were Motorolas as well--starting with a brick and the DPC550 flip. Both were workhorses that probably would've survived a fall from the top of the Empire State. The DPC550 even let me swap batteries mid-call. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin
Posts: 639
|
<nelson> ha ha </nelson>
"I'm learning how to meditate, so far so good."
Donald Fagen and Walter Becker |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 344
|
I also like my three-year-old RAZR. It makes and receives calls (most of the time), it synchronizes telephone numbers with Address book, even distinguishes between home, work and mobile numbers. It's first names only but that is fine with me. It also sends and receives SMS. And on top its calendar synchronizes with iCal.
It also has a clock, a calculator and an alarm clock. What more could ask of a phone? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hull, UK
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,149
|
Quote:
Oh, how the mighty have fallen. Motorola, the company that brought us the very first production cell phone, the good, old DynaTAC "brick." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 557
|
Shut down Motorola and give the money back to shareholders .
They may as well all give up really, quit while nokia, sony eric,samsung still have their dignity. IMO |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: From Parts Unknown
Posts: 2,282
|
I find it very hard to believe that Motorola is going to quit the consumer cellphone market altogether. But they do desperately need some help over there.
Their quality control, in both software and hardware, is abominable. Its pretty much par for the course for Moto cellphones to be released with tons of significant bugs, faulty charger ports, battery/power issues, etc. And Moto's day-to-day execution pretty much sucks across the board... a relative of mine worked in their cellphone division, and he said that pretty much anyone who knew what they were doing over there either left or is leaving Moto for greener pastures, because the company simply cannot seem to get its head out of its a** to save its own life. ![]() Let's just say this... when I asked said relative what phone to buy, he said: "Don't get a Moto. I'd try RIM (Blackberry)." .
The iPhone 3GS-
Cut-copy-paste, MMS, landscape keyboard, video-recording, voice-calling, and more... FINALLY To the 'We Didn't Need It' Crowd/Apple Apologista Squad™ : Wrong again, lol Thanks for listening to your users, Apple. =] |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 271
|
A Sad Day
Actually, quite sad for those who like me started using cellular phones with the famous Motorola "brick," and years later with the infallible StarTac (other than its antennas that everyone kept breaking). Motorola played an indispensable role in helping make what has become the mobile phone industry today. Too bad most here have no clue what it was like in the beginning, but then again most Americans could care less about history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 364
|
I have had a Motorola phone and used those of friends. My major gripe has always been that they just don't seem to get connectivity. With Windows you needed an extra application and have the computer initiate discovery and data transfers. This is lame, especially when you consider Bluetooth. If there was another way it was not obvious. In fact my friends RAZR only became useful when he got his Mac, though I am not sure how much of this is Motorola's fault and how of the is Windows'.
In many ways Motorola was old school, in the wrong way, and just didn't understand what it needed to keep up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 557
|
Best thing Motorola could do is jump on the Android bandwagon. No point in giving up just yet. I dont know what OS they have been using, but it strikes me that it's at the heart of their problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 267
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Jamaica Plain, MA
Posts: 474
|
Motorola has been coasting on their industrial design while their software has been allowed to languish and become a joke of the industry. No one wants to spend a few hundred on a phone, or even get a "free" phone and deal with an unintuitive, cumbersome UI that is guaranteed to be slow as hell.
Which is not to say their industrial design is that great. The RAZR is notorious for falling apart for no reason at all, and putting a ringer-change button on the outside of every phone is monumentally stupid. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 2,695
|
Quote:
Motorola has a ton of engineering talent. It just needs a visionary who can see how partnering with the Apples, the Boeings, the Lockheeds, NASA and more to provide advanced parts to allow for advances, in general. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 19
|
oh i'm one of those with a long history with motorola. i've had those first bricks and 4 startacs. then i started to realize motorola wasn't the same anymore...
well, today i would never buy a motorola again. it's a shi**y product with a terrible os...
jp ferreira: in my life..
http://www.jpferreira.com.br ayala!goebb comunicação + negócios http://www.ayalagoebb.com.br |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 142
|
The RAZR is a nice-looking (and sized) phone with an interface that is like being hit in the face with a brick.
Windows Mobile is like being hit in the face with a brick that occasionally explodes. I had to hard-reset periodically to get the damn thing to make a phone call--losing all of my data and contacts in the process. EPIC FAIL. As far as I am concerned, the only player in the market at present other than Apple is Nokia. If HTC were to put Android on their hardware (instead of WM), Apple might have a problem on its hands. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,700
|
Amen. They (Moto) focused so hard on branding (nice ads, nice photography, but unsubstantial products) and "ever thinner" RAZR "2 V9! Latest OMFG!" .... and as you say, rubbish OS, sad but true, RAZR is the SUXXZR. That said, no way Moto is just going to dump out its mobile phones overnight. Still a core business. "...and instead focus on its enterprise and government sectors"... I nearly spat out my morning tea when reading that.
Yes, selling off the mobile business and concentrating on enterprise and government sectors is something Moto may well do. However, this would be entirely insane and IMO, it could happen, if it does, Goodbye Moto. You were important for a while, now I just look at your pretty ads and laugh at the creatives that milked your Marketing Dept. for all, *all* that it is worth. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: From Parts Unknown
Posts: 2,282
|
Quote:
![]() The have developed a new Java/Linux OS (JUIX) that's a lot better, but, in typical Moto fashion, they have been incredibly slow to roll it out across their entire lineup. I guess they call it 'execution' because if you don't, you're really executing yourself? ![]() .
The iPhone 3GS-
Cut-copy-paste, MMS, landscape keyboard, video-recording, voice-calling, and more... FINALLY To the 'We Didn't Need It' Crowd/Apple Apologista Squad™ : Wrong again, lol Thanks for listening to your users, Apple. =] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 8,557
|
I owned a Razr, a piece of crap.
Collecting my SSD iMac Fry-die. :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4
|
What will Nextel do?
As almost all of their handsets are made by Moto....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
|
Hi, this is my first post - I was moved to sign up because this thread just reminded me of how much I loved my startac.
I like to think I am not subject to bouts of nostalgia... guess not... where's the 512K enhanced thread? also, my razr is the only cell phone, except for the startac, that gets reception that is far better than anyone else in the room... |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 634
|
Quote:
![]()
Tory Hagen
Break the Wedge! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2
|
Late 90's Motorola decides power PC CPUs for desktop (ie Apple) ain't worth it anymore 'cause "Apple is teh dying", declaring the AIM alliance a failure, and focus resources on power pc for communications stuff, tossing apple to the curb, and switching their semiconductor group to all windows/dell, dumping Macs that had been there for years. Later the semiconductor group is amputated by demand of wall streeters, shareholders for bleeding billions quarter after quarter. Year 2001 60,000 people were laid off at motorola. Freescale formerly the semiconductor group is sold to a private group and taken off the stock market. Motorola drops from #1 cellphone maker to #2 to Nokia. More recently they continued, dropping to #3. In part because they were getting their chips from Freescale, who still couldn't get the product out. So ironic that now Apple is playing in Motorola's field and taking their customers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
|
Maybe not if MOTO's problem was bad management. The only reason the RAZR line existed at all was that its original team was in some sort of special isolation from standard MOTO red tape. It doesn't sound like the company learned anything from that project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 209
|
Quote:
Every 'Oil patch' employee from Texas to Alberta had a Motorola phone. It was a phone that "could be dropped from the Empire State Building, and survive" as another poster stated. It was a phone for trades people... rugged, durable. An industry phone when only industry could afford cell. Then they sucked some choda for 10 years and coasted on contracts with providers, all the while being surpassed by Nokia and Samsung. They didn't do anything significant again until the RAZOR (Macbook Air tactic). "Hey look... it's thin... it sucks ass and nobody wants it... but it's thin". What happened is that consumers got educated and sophisticated in Motorola's 10 year coasting period. The RAZOR was the last 'OMG... industrial design matters over function" phone to be released. What I find interesting is that Apple realized this flaw in the industry, and created the iPhone... but have severely and detrimentally made the same mistake as Motorola with the Macbook Air. Innovation and industrial design together are a sure thing. On their own... not so much. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 65
|
Quote:
I worked there as a contractor, sadly to say migrating Mac's over to HP desktops. I must of saw every variation of mac made at the time, this was before OSX. I suppose thats where I got interested in Mac hardware. Though, I hope Apple don't take over their business or engineers. Mind you Motorola were very good at dual and tri band mobiles. So maybe they should take one or two radio engineers. But I reckon they're well into finishing the next gen iPhone with 3G |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 65
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|