AppleInsider AppleInsider Forums


Go Back   AppleInsider > iPod + iTunes + AppleTV
Register Members List New Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2008, 12:19 PM   #1
franciscoandre
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14
Ups, after using iTunes Store for 2 years, only today I realized that I cam to this world on the same days this music online retailer does! Not bad, at all!
franciscoandre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 12:21 PM   #2
AppleInsider
Kasper's Automated Slave
 
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,156
Apple celebrates 5 years of iTunes Store, 10 million song catalog

Apple on Monday took pause in a section of its iTunes Store to celebrate half a decade of the digital download service that brought mainstream acceptance to the market for paid digital downloads.

"This is where it all began. Launching on April 28, 2003, the iTunes Music Store offered an easy way to download the music you love for $0.99 a song with no subscription fees," Apple wrote in a note to iTunes shoppers. "We had more than 200,000 songs and a handful of exclusive tracks."

Since then, the service has gone on to become the No. 1 retailer of music in the United States with a music catalog of more than 10 million songs (announced today, up from 6 million), in addition to over 20,000 audiobooks, 10,000 music videos, 350 television shows, and 1000 feature films.

Shoppers on the iTunes Store Monday were greeted with a sign paying homage to the service on its fifth birthday, and directing them to a new section of the store "offering a look back at all the great music, video, and exclusives you first discovered on iTunes, highlighting the songs and shows that defined each year."

During a recent conference call covering second fiscal quarter results, members of Apple's leadership said the iTunes Store is growing to comprise an increasingly larger portion of the company's business each quarter.



The store maintains a customer base of over 50 million, management said, and continues to dominate the US market for paid digital music downloads with an over 85 percent share, according to Nielsen SoundScan.
AppleInsider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 12:58 PM   #3
dontlookleft
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 157
mo money mo.
dontlookleft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 12:59 PM   #4
solipsism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,815
They just missed selling 5 Billions song in 5 years. That would have been great for marketing. Though they can still say they sold 5B in their 5th year, when they achieve that goal in about 2 months.
solipsism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 01:20 PM   #5
eAi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 366
No mention on the UK store...
eAi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 01:21 PM   #6
SpamSandwich
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,453
Congratulations, Steve and Apple folks. You're making some of us a lot of moolah.


"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."
—Thomas Jefferson


Proud AAPL stock owner.
SpamSandwich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 01:22 PM   #7
hdasmith
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by eAi View Post
No mention on the UK store...
Hardly surprising as it didn't launch here for a couple of years after (I can't remember exactly how long ago it was).
hdasmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 02:17 PM   #8
coolfactor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Van Isle, BC, Canada
Posts: 208
only the US store

This celebration is only in the US store, as there is where iTunes Music Store launched. Please adjust the headline and/or article to clarify this.

One can switch their iTunes to the US store to access the celebration pages.
coolfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 03:58 PM   #9
zorinlynx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 70
Now if only they'd wake up and make the majority of the catalog DRM-free. I've been buying from Amazon MP3 lately simply because of the lack of DRM.

iTunes Plus selection utterly pales in comparison to Amazon MP3.

WAKE UP, Apple! when the choice is between no DRM or DRM, I'll go no DRM EVERY TIME. It's a no brainer!
zorinlynx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 04:02 PM   #10
coolfactor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Van Isle, BC, Canada
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by zorinlynx View Post
Now if only they'd wake up and make the majority of the catalog DRM-free. I've been buying from Amazon MP3 lately simply because of the lack of DRM.

iTunes Plus selection utterly pales in comparison to Amazon MP3.

WAKE UP, Apple! when the choice is between no DRM or DRM, I'll go no DRM EVERY TIME. It's a no brainer!
It's not Apple, it's the music labels holding iTunes back in this respect. Apple wants DRM-free tracks for all of their music. That's obvious.
coolfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 04:06 PM   #11
solipsism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by zorinlynx View Post
WAKE UP, Apple! when the choice is between no DRM or DRM, I'll go no DRM EVERY TIME. It's a no brainer!
Recall that Apple was teh first to suggest DRM-free music. They were also the first to get a studio on board. They also got the wrath of the Warner CEO from even suggesting such an absurd idea. That same Warner CEO went on to offer Amazon DRM-free audio. Apple clearly wants DRM-free audio as it will them sell more devices, but the studios want to usurp Apple's from its throne.
solipsism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 04:15 PM   #12
Chris_CA
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by hdasmith View Post
Hardly surprising as it didn't launch here for a couple of years after (I can't remember exactly how long ago it was).
"On 15 June 2004, the iTunes Music Store was launched in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITunes_Music_Store
Chris_CA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 04:53 PM   #13
Porchland
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 283
And STILL no Beatles. (And no Garth Brooks either, which I noticed this weekend.)
Porchland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 01:34 AM   #14
federmoose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California -- New York
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolfactor View Post
It's not Apple, it's the music labels holding iTunes back in this respect. Apple wants DRM-free tracks for all of their music. That's obvious.
seconded. also, can it just be mentioned that the reason the movie library is not that large is also not due to Apple but with the distribution companies? and furthermore, the reason we can rent some movies we can't buy is because its easier to get a rental contract than a contract for purchasing? sorry for the unrelated rant, but those darned reviews on iTunes really annoy me.

Though I must say the labels are succeeding at holding iTunes back. I hate the idea of purchasing non-plus music knowing I'll eventually pay another $0.30 to upgrade. I've started buying physical CD's for the quality in the interim.
federmoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 01:36 AM   #15
federmoose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California -- New York
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porchland View Post
And STILL no Beatles. (And no Garth Brooks either, which I noticed this weekend.)
this isn't apple's fault either. you know about the dispute right? Apple (then Computer) Inc kept its name by promising it would never get into the music business after Apple records sued their butts for taking their name... oops...
federmoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 01:44 AM   #16
solipsism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by federmoose View Post
this isn't apple's fault either. you know about the dispute right? Apple (then Computer) Inc kept its name by promising it would never get into the music business after Apple records sued their butts for taking their name... oops...
I think McCartney may need the money now. Though I hear that his ex-wife may be able to get a piece of that too, which is absolutely absurd.
solipsism is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.