AppleInsider AppleInsider Forums


Go Back   AppleInsider > iPhone
Register Members List New Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2008, 12:32 PM   #1
AppleInsider
Kasper's Automated Slave
 
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,165
New deals seen tripling Apple's addressable market for iPhone

A flurry of new agreements between Apple and international wireless carriers has given American Technology Research higher conviction in the iPhone's near-term growth prospects, prompting an analyst at the firm to raise his price target on the company for the second time in as many weeks.

"Last week was busy for new carrier agreements," analyst Shaw Wu wrote in a note to clients on Monday. "Vodafone, Telecom Italia, America Movil and Roger Wireless now expect to launch iPhone later this year."

The analyst said the arrangements should more than triple Apple's wireless subscriber opportunity from about 150 million potential customers today to approximately 470 million around the time the handset maker unveils its 3G iPhone.

As a result, Wu bumped his price target on Apple shares for the second time in two weeks to $220, and also raised his forecast for cumulative iPhone shipments by the end of 2008 to 14.6 million from 11 million units.

The change reflects expectations that Apple will ship approximately 11 million iPhones in 2008, or about one million more than the company stated that it hoped to sell over the course of the year. For 2009, the analyst is now expecting the Cupertino-based firm to ship 17 million units, up from his previous estimate of 10 million.

"We continue to believe unlocked iPhones will play an important role in driving sales, but lower than the 55-60 percent contribution we estimated for the December quarter," he wrote. "We see it trending towards 25 percent over the next couple of quarters as more carriers are signed up, particularly in Asia-Pacific."

In a separate report Monday out of investment firm Piper Jaffray, analyst Gene Munster offered a slightly different interpretation of the mass carrier agreements, mainly that they signal an "imminent" release of a 3G iPhone.

"We continue to expect a 3G iPhone to be launched in mid-June. Given the channels are running dry of the current models (8GB and 16GB), the limited availability is one of several indications that the release of a new model is imminent," he wrote.

"We expect the second-generation iPhone to be slightly redesigned with 3G mobile data. Apple's Worldwide Developer's Conference on June 9th is a likely event at which Apple could announce the design and features of the new device."

Munster noted that while the limited availability of iPhones at the online Apple Store and in some retail stores puts pressure on iPhone unit expectations in the June quarter, he believes the release of a new model in June will serve to offset any loss of sales over the next few weeks.

As such, the analyst reiterated confidence in his estimate of 1.7 million iPhone shipments in the June quarter, as well as his Buy rating and $250 price target on shares of Apple.
AppleInsider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 12:43 PM   #2
studiomusic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 132
Shaw Wu: OMG AAPL is falling!!! Sell! $175 price target...
what? AAPL is at $180?? eh, new price target... you can buy again after you lost all that money selling...
WHAT?? It's at $187??!?!?! Ok, new price target... um... $220
studiomusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 12:59 PM   #3
SpamSandwich
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,461
This "analyst" is like a crack-smoker. He'll try anything to get his fix.


"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."
—Thomas Jefferson


Proud AAPL stock owner.
SpamSandwich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 01:07 PM   #4
echosonic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Kahleefornyah
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpamSandwich View Post
This "analyst" is like a crack-smoker. He'll try anything to get his fix.
He's either a completely manipulating fraudulent tool or a SCANDALOUSLY incompetent moron who needs to be shut down permanently by the SEC. ASAP.

How they allow this idiot to get away with what he's doing is a mystery to me.

I have logged several complaints with SEC myself, am I the only one?
echosonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 01:20 PM   #5
drjjones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by echosonic View Post
He's either a completely manipulating fraudulent tool or a SCANDALOUSLY incompetent moron who needs to be shut down permanently by the SEC. ASAP.

How they allow this idiot to get away with what he's doing is a mystery to me.

I have logged several complaints with SEC myself, am I the only one?
You haven't heard of free speech ?
drjjones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 01:21 PM   #6
Abster2core
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by echosonic View Post
He's either a completely manipulating fraudulent tool or a SCANDALOUSLY incompetent moron who needs to be shut down permanently by the SEC. ASAP.

How they allow this idiot to get away with what he's doing is a mystery to me.

I have logged several complaints with SEC myself, am I the only one?
Wu is an analyst. He, by law, can't and doesn't promote stock.

His boss(es) and the company's clients decide on his employment. They make money from how well his reports stack up. Right now and for some time, he has made done extremely well, and by organizations that measure such things, he sits up near the top.

Equally important, his work is well within the dictates of the SEC.
Abster2core is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 01:24 PM   #7
studiomusic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 132
Recently though, Wu has become a FUD Packer.
studiomusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 01:41 PM   #8
sikras
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by studiomusic View Post
Shaw Wu: OMG AAPL is falling!!! Sell! $175 price target...
what? AAPL is at $180?? eh, new price target... you can buy again after you lost all that money selling...
WHAT?? It's at $187??!?!?! Ok, new price target... um... $220


LOL


Good Call. That's funny
sikras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 01:41 PM   #9
McHuman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 154
only listen to gene.
McHuman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 01:59 PM   #10
ascii
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 799
If Apple make a version of .Mac for the iPhone, they will be able to get subscription revenues even from people who have unlocked their phone (provided the extra features it enables are compelling enough).

Perhaps this is what they are planning, and why they are suddenly opening up the phone to so many new markets and multiple providers in some of those markets.
ascii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 03:11 PM   #11
SpamSandwich
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by studiomusic View Post
Recently though, Wu has become a FUD Packer.




"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."
—Thomas Jefferson


Proud AAPL stock owner.
SpamSandwich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 03:30 PM   #12
echosonic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Kahleefornyah
Posts: 226
Quote:
Originally Posted by drjjones View Post
You haven't heard of free speech ?
You haven't heard of "Market Manipulation?"

(It's illegal)
echosonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 03:37 PM   #13
mdriftmeyer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 2,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by drjjones View Post
You haven't heard of free speech ?
Free Speech is in the Public Square and it's still regulated.

In his line of work, speculation is expected, but patterned speculation is illegal.
mdriftmeyer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 05:34 PM   #14
k2director
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post
The change reflects expectations that Apple will ship approximately 11 million iPhones in 2008, or about one million more than the company stated that it hoped to sell over the course of the year.
Apple never said it would sell 10 million iPhones in over the course of a year (ie, 2008). It said it would sell 10 million cumulative iPhones by the end of 2008, giving itself about 1.5 years to do so (ie, June 29 2007 to Dec 31 2008).

So if Apple ships 11 million iPhones in 2008, then you need to add that figure to its 2007 sales, and you get a number that blows away its goal of selling 10 million iPhones by Dec 31, 2008.
k2director is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 05:40 PM   #15
Flounder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lansing
Posts: 2,513
Noooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


A good brain ain't diddly if you don't have the facts
Flounder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 09:38 PM   #16
Captain Jack
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 38
Wu's earlier downgrade looked suss at the time, now it looks extremely suss.

All the same, he is right now, AAPL is headed over 200, still you don't have to be Einstein to see that one.
Captain Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 03:50 AM   #17
TBaggins
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: From Parts Unknown
Posts: 2,282
Quote:
Originally Posted by k2director View Post
Apple never said it would sell 10 million iPhones in over the course of a year (ie, 2008). It said it would sell 10 million cumulative iPhones by the end of 2008, giving itself about 1.5 years to do so (ie, June 29 2007 to Dec 31 2008).






.


The iPhone 3GS-
Cut-copy-paste, MMS, landscape keyboard, video-recording, voice-calling, and more... FINALLY
To the 'We Didn't Need It' Crowd/Apple Apologista Squad™ : Wrong again, lol
Thanks for listening to your users, Apple. =]
TBaggins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2008, 01:06 PM   #18
dfiler
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,666
Funny pic, but what k2director said is not incorrect.

Apple employees (including steve) have made a few statements that have been interpreted differently by different people. The AI article interpreted it one way and stated that as fact, glossing over the other interpretation as if it didn't exist.

People seem to have a rather strong personal stake in promoting one interpretation or the other. Pretty strange really. In actuality though, the language used was quite simply, ambiguous.
dfiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.