|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Kasper's Automated Slave
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,166
|
Latest iPhone deals nearly quadruple Apple's addressable market
An announcement by France Telecom's Orange subsidiary on Friday to deliver the iPhone to 10 more countries later this year effectively quadruples Apple's total addressable market when combined with other carrier announcements over the past two weeks, according to investment firm Piper Jaffray.
"Currently Apple's total addressable market includes 153 million subscribers in 6 countries with AT&T, T-Mobile Germany and Austria, O2, and Orange," analyst Gene Munster wrote in a report. "These announcements increase those numbers to 575 million subscribers in 42 countries including recent agreements with Vodafone, SingTel, American Movil, Swisscom, and Orange." The rapid international rollout is about 8 months ahead of the analyst's expectations, giving him much higher confidence in his earlier predictions that the company will sell 12.9 million iPhones this year and 45 million next year. "To give some context to these numbers, Apple sold 3.7 million iPhones in 2007 into a total addressable market of 148 million subscribers (or 3 percent penetration)," he explained. "Taking the recent carrier announcements into consideration, we are modeling for Apple's penetration rate to remain at 3 percent in 2008 and double to 6 percent in 2009." Munster's model for 2009 factors in the assumption that the handset maker will have by that time rolled out the iPhone into the blistering Chinese and Japanese markets, which would nearly double the iPhone's addressable market again from 575 million to 1.1 billion. In general, the analyst believes the majority of Apple's new carrier agreements are non-exclusive deals that will have a positive impact on iPhone units and a negative impact on iPhone revenue share. For investors, however, the overall net impact should be positive, he said, as he believes Apple shares will trade on unit numbers alone for the next year or so. "We expect the next generation iPhone to launch in mid-June, shortly after Apple's Worldwide Developer's conference on June 9 and the international rollout will continue throughout the second half of 2008," Munster wrote. "While there is little question that the next version of the iPhone will include 3G mobile data, we can now all but confirm 3G in the second-generation iPhone." The analyst maintained his Buy rating and $250 price target on shares of Apple. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4
|
What's Up With Apple Stock?
Unreal. Apple is prospering beyond measure! The iPhone is going literally all over the world! There is a new 3G iPhone inevitably set to be released! The MacBook family is set for updates! Apple just opened its biggest retail store in the world! All this and Apple stock is down almost $2.00/share!
![]() What's going on with this stock market?! Come on! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 205
|
Notice that this deal cancels the exclusivity arrangement that was in place with Austria with T-Mobile.
Will other currently exclusive markets be going multi-carrier as well? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Belgium - Great Beer - shit governement
Posts: 188
|
Contrary to the table - its NOT called Vodaphone BUT VODAFONE
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,895
|
Quote:
Quote:
The MacBook line was recently updating, don't expect anything until the fall. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 981
|
Quote:
Duh! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tinton Falls, NJ
Posts: 702
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,415
|
And because no one has corrected it yet ...
The store Apple just opened is *not* "the biggest Apple store in the world." It's big, but not the biggest by quite a bit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lansing
Posts: 2,513
|
Quote:
The NASDAQ is down a bit to day, and Apple is lagging a little behind the market. It can't go up every day. That's just not how it works.
A good brain ain't diddly if you don't have the facts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: In rehab for sex addiction
Posts: 9,481
|
And yet not everyone in the US can get the iPhone. I hope they somehow get out of their exclusivity arrangement with AT&T in the US.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
![]() Now for the international expansion itself... that's incredible. Here are a couple of my wishes and maybe some expert out there can chime in on the future, near and far, possibilities of these. Once the AT&T combine is past the exclusive stage, how about an iPhone that will be usable on other networks or have multiple frequencies built in for great roaming and if the original contract carrier is not available any other carrier can be used. Of course, the carriers themselves would have to agree to this which I think is a great idea. To carry this idea forward to international use. What about a phone that you CAN take anywhere from country to county and be able to use it without the terrible, high, premium roaming charges. Whether or not a quad iPhone is a possibility or not for this, you could leave behind the idea if getting different cards for different counties/networks. I would think that if all the wireless carries would work together for this, all of them would prosper more with co-operative agreements for usage. The various frequencies technically is one major hurdle, but if they can make scanners that you can dial in any frequency within a certain range, why can't the same be true with a phone? I am sure this universal blending will take a long time, but there was a phone that I had heard about from "National Geographic" that was truly international. You had to pay a high price of usage, but it would work in many countries. I don't know if it still exists but wouldn't it be great to see the iPhone be able to work the same way? ![]() Ok, there is my 4 cents worth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,328
|
The question is...will AAPL hit $250 in the coming months?
The crazy thing about the stock market is that despite record numbers, it doesn't always equate to record highs in share price. ![]() If Apple sells their targeted $10mil iPhones this year...the 'street' will say, well we expected 12.9 mil. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Kahleefornyah
Posts: 226
|
Quote:
The reason they are still where they are is that Wall Street is having a rather difficult time coming to the realization that Apple is no longer a "tech company" as much as its a "Consumer Electronics" company. AAPL is not even close to bloated at 188 a share. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Kahleefornyah
Posts: 226
|
Quote:
Then Apple will deliver 15. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 130
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
Apple should have passed $250 by now, but it's the most watched stock by analysts, critics and never good enough for them no matter what apple accomplishes. Apple shareholders tend to sell quick on any slight negative news or low prediction estimates caused by analysts. I see other tech stocks shareholders not panic as bad with their stocks. I'll bet the day the 3G Iphone is anounced, people will complain the price is too high or not enough features on the phone so more silly reasons to sell the stock that day. I will be thankful if Apple passes the 52 week high. ($201.) Last edited by sikras; 05-16-2008 at 06:51 PM.. Reason: spelling error |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,706
|
Quote:
Addressable market should realistically be defined on three levels. One: subscriber base as Gene has done. Two: entire population of those countries (depending on vendor lock). Three: THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF THE EARTH. Point three is not so far-fetched, anyone in the world that wants or conceivably is going to purchase a mobile phone is the real addressable market of the iPhone, and it has been since DAY ONE. Read: Unlocking. From Bahrain to Penang to Slovakia to Jakarta. Everyone has a bloody iPhone. I respect the current thinking and earning ability of analysts, investors, business owners and managers. But this is 2008, and addressable market based on Telco subscription is basically, rubbish. It is the chronic lack of foresight that has lead to the Western demise of their outdated music, TV and movie economies as they have known it. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ASHLAND, KY
Posts: 1,819
|
this is just with one model, imagine different models diff price points
I APPLE THEREFORE I AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boise, ID among others
Posts: 529
|
Quote:
I am going to crunch some numbers later, but I would guess that with my simple method of also counting "potential switchers", the "addressable market" for the iPhone would increase by at least 50% ~500 million cited. Quote:
Anyways, back to the present for a moment. It would most likely be much easier to develop a radio chip capable of operating on all the frequency bands of a particular technology, say UMTS/GSM or CDMA (CDMA2000), but NOT both. Throughout the world, there are many frequency bands that CDMA, GSM, and UMTS operate on, frequently divided up by region. Usually North America, South America, Europe, Middle east+Africa, and Asia. Australia and New Zealand are split between North America and European tech. Now of course, this is not true for all cellphone technology and there are many exceptions. To show you how complicated this can get, here's just the USA: Verizon Wireless CDMA 1xRTT (2.75G) = 800Mhz EV-DO rev. A (3.5G) = 800+1900mhz (independent upload/download bands) Sprint Nextel CDMA 1xRTT (2.75G) = 1900mhz EV-DO rev. A (3.5G) = 1900mhz AT&T GSM+EDGE = 850Mhz or 1900Mhz (same band for both upload/download) UMTS = 850 or 1900Mhz (same band for both upload/download) T-Mobile GSM+EDGE = 1900Mhz UMTS 1700+2100Mhz (independent upload/download bands) and here is all the current frequency bands for the popular technologies World GSM operating bands = 450Mhz (Scandinavia), 850Mhz (USA/Canada), 900Mhz (Europe), 1800Mhz (Europe), 1900Mhz (USA/Canada) World UMTS operating bands = 800Mhz (Japan), 850Mhz (USA/Canada/Australia), 900Mhz (Europe), 1700+2100Mhz (USA T-Mobile), 1900Mhz (USA/Canada), 2100+1900Mhz (Europe) World CDMA2000 operating bands = 450Mhz, 450+800Mhz, 450+1900Mhz, 700Mhz, 800Mhz, 800+1900Mhz, 850Mhz, 1700Mhz, 1900Mhz, and 2100Mhz Last edited by winterspan; 05-17-2008 at 02:13 AM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
But, will the cellular companies start loosing more and more business from this? I guess we will wait and see. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 322
|
I told you so
I welcome the new iPhone business model Apple is putting in place - well done Apple!
Funny thing is though, where are all the fan-boys who were months ago arguing how clever and appropriate was the old model based on call revenue sharing? I and others chastised Apple vigorously over their greed-based model and we were criticised vigorously for our sour grapes attitude and were told Apple were not interested in the mass-market for phones, they were only interested in the cream on top and that they could be hugely profitable by just dominating the premium phone sector. These same people argued that the revenue sharing model was just brilliant for Apple shareholders because it was going to generate the maximum profits possible from the iPhone platform and was nothing less than further indication of Apple's infallible genius at work. Oh my, how things have changed ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ASHLAND, KY
Posts: 1,819
|
version iphone v1 was a work in progress to test the waters, i think with the unlocking going on and how much people are willing to pay for an unlocked phone this got SJ's attention AND the revenue from the 3rd party apps may replace the version 1 business model. so to build loyalty carriers will subsidize the iphone, unlocked iphones will cost MORE and revenue sharing will be with some carriers and with 3rd party apps, covering a lot of bases. each country seems to be dealt with a way to maximize revenue for apple and to keep customers from unlocking and using the phones on another network seems it's a win win for SJ and carriers.
iphone v1 sure did keep the hype up and showed those carriers that were hesitant about adding NEW USERS how much they could grow. as i said in past posts it costs the carrier's a ton to get a customer to switch, iphone makes it much much easier.
I APPLE THEREFORE I AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,706
|
Quote:
The most important thing is not for Apple to go OMFG LETS MAKE TEH TRILLIONS MORE!!! W00t and then unsustainably grow the company. We've all seen what happens in these situations, I'm sure. I'm going to be more radical here and propose that the only measure of addressable market going forward is not who will buy and how much, but what is the capacity of Apple, Inc. to grow, deal with, and meet global demand. That is the true key in the economics of this enterprise, IMHO. Last edited by nvidia2008; 05-17-2008 at 11:29 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,706
|
Quote:
No matter how lucrative carrier contracts may be, their new strategy for iPhone now will give them multiples of profit more. Whatever pro-carrier-locking advocates there have been in Apple management, even they can't ignore the huge demand at their feet any longer. Again, mass market of phones is not the problem, I will reiterate: the problem is how is the company going to deal with huge global demand of all their products across the world over the next few years. Supply chain and inventory is of course, important. Knowledgeable staff and enthusiasts is important. Tech support and service will be slammed hard (simply because of huge numbers of units). Company growth will need to be managed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,895
|
Quote:
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UMTS_frequency_bandsAre we to expect Bands I, II, V and VIII in the iPhone? Does that correspond with the rumoured radio that is to be included? Last edited by solipsism; 05-17-2008 at 12:12 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,461
|
Since no one other than Apple and at&t apparently know the length of their current agreement, perhaps these new deals signal the impending end of their agreement in the US, leading to multiple carrier choice and an assured 10 million iPhone sales IN 2008! One can only hope...
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."
—Thomas Jefferson Proud AAPL stock owner. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,461
|
Quote:
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."
—Thomas Jefferson Proud AAPL stock owner. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,461
|
Quote:
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."
—Thomas Jefferson Proud AAPL stock owner. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,895
|
Quote:
Not an FM radio; I'm referring to the 3G radio.Last edited by solipsism; 05-17-2008 at 03:38 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,461
|
Sorry 'bout that... my misunderstanding.
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground."
—Thomas Jefferson Proud AAPL stock owner. Last edited by SpamSandwich; 05-17-2008 at 06:28 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boise, ID among others
Posts: 529
|
Quote:
2100 (downlink) / 1900 (uplink) for Japan, Europe, Brazil and Asia 1900 / 850 (independently, for both the uplink and downlink) for Americas (US, Canada, Latin America and Brazil) (e.g. AT&T Mobility and Rogers Wireless) * 2100 (downlink) / 1700 (uplink) for America (e.g. T-Mobile USA) * 800 for Japan (NTT DoCoMo in rural areas) 850 for Australia (Telstra NextG) 900 (Europe, Asia, Oceania) So, assuming AT&T exclusivity remains and since T-mobile doesn't even have their 3G network running yet, we can remove T-Mobile from the list and and get rid of the 1700mhz band. Also if NTT DoCoMo is not a carrier or if they are but don't need compatibility for the 800mhz part of their network, then we can remove 800mhz support too. That leaves only four frequencies: 850Mhz, 900Mhz, 1900Mhz, 2100Mhz to support. I assume they probably make or can make quad-band chips for these frequencies. Does anyone know what bands most "quad-band" UMTS radios support? I can't find it online... I'll try and do more research on this and put together a chart. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,895
|
Quote:
If anyone has the PDF link to the PMB8878, please post it. edit1: I found the part number but the name has changed to X-GOLD 608 as of April 16th and the PDF file listed is blank. • http://www.infineon.com/cms/en/produ...12ab6ab94205efedit2: Here is an interesting article from just two days ago... • http://www.itwire.com/content/view/18236/1103/ Last edited by solipsism; 05-18-2008 at 01:56 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 72
|
the occasional drop doesn't mean Apple stock isn't on the way up
Quote:
If you believe Apple has it right and the 3G phone will do even better, you may want to consider buying stock. But don't buy a house too near sea level ![]()
Philip Machanick creator of Opinionations
Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Australia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 155
|
also interesting is all the at&t stores still have supplies of iphones. no new iphone till they are sold out is my guess . maybe by next week
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: united mexican states
Posts: 1,326
|
i believe it is "America Movil" not "American Movil"
oh and this just in: planet express to distribute new iphone in mars and omicron persei 8. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,706
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|