AppleInsider AppleInsider Forums


Go Back   AppleInsider > Mac OS
Register Members List New Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-16-2008, 02:12 AM   #1
AppleInsider
Kasper's Automated Slave
 
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,151
New seed shows Apple near wrap-up of Mac OS X 10.5.6

A quickly released follow-up test build of Mac OS X 10.5.6 comes with no known problems and points to Apple getting much closer to a finished patch.

Build 9G38, whose seed notes were posted online late Saturday by HMBT, is said by Apple to have no known issues and comes just three days after build 9G35, which had only only a few problems to target of its own.

The removal of any known glitches from these lists isn't by itself an indication that 10.5.6 is ready but does show Apple in the very last stages of its development cycle, which usually only leave a small amount of testing for those areas of the software the company believes may still contain hidden bugs.

Apple's fixed item list is relatively small and touches on synching as a whole, problems with DVI output and the Superdrive, and downloading playlists.

As with the version released earlier in the week, 9G38 is said to focus on MobileMe and the automatic sync process, especially with those networks where lag and bandwidth are known concerns. It also asks testers to check transfer performance when they sync from Me.com rather than a computer or a mobile device.

An extra focus is on sending mail either partly or entirely in non-Latin languages, such as Chinese or Hangul. Apple's engineering team also reportedly wants to hear of any problems that hard-lock the system in a kernel panic or freeze.

The new test code continues to have a very broad scope and lists over 80 apps or system components one which Apple wants to focus; this is one of Apple's most ambitious yet for its roughly year-old operating system.
AppleInsider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 02:18 AM   #2
jwervel16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 30
Tuesday. Mark my words.

jwervel16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 02:46 AM   #3
iijuanii
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19
so....
What are we gonna see at macworld in January?

I was gonna buy the new macbook the day it came out, but after seeing the prices/specs, soon came to the conclusion that the white macbook is getting scrapped, and the current models are being priced down in January.

but most importantly, i'm thinking there will be some new software upgrade in January.
i'm hoping
iijuanii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 03:04 AM   #4
ltcommander.data
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 204
Hopefully there are some nice graphics driver improvements in 10.5.6 as hinted at in the recent Torque Game Engine Advanced for Mac Beta system requirements:

http://www.garagegames.com/blogs/985/15671

Quote:
OS X 10.5.5 (we highly recommend updating to 10.5.6 when it comes out...it fixes some serious driver bugs)
Hopefully these bug fixes translate into performance gains.

And I guess this means iPhone 2.2 is close too to tie in the MobileMe syncing stuff. Which probably means the obligatory update to iTunes as well.
ltcommander.data is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 04:20 AM   #5
hittrj01
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by iijuanii View Post
so....
What are we gonna see at macworld in January?

I was gonna buy the new macbook the day it came out, but after seeing the prices/specs, soon came to the conclusion that the white macbook is getting scrapped, and the current models are being priced down in January.

but most importantly, i'm thinking there will be some new software upgrade in January.
i'm hoping
Refreshed iMacs, Mac Pros, and (hopefully) Mac Minis. Possibly definite, concrete news and demos of Snow Leopard. Also, I wouldn't be surprised to see a new version of iLife and/or iWork, maybe Aperture or Final Cut (probably not, though), and please (PLEASE, Apple) iPhone push notification that was promised for September!!

As far as the white MacBook getting axed, I tend to agree with you, but I highly doubt they will drop the prices of the current aluminum models. They will probably replace the white MacBook with an aluminum model with the same specs (sans FireWire, of course ) and keep it at $999, or possibly bump it back up to $1099. Keeping the white MacBook had all the signs of an end-of-life inventory dump, and it just doesn't mesh with the rest of the Mac line (aluminum, glass, etc.)
hittrj01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 05:52 AM   #6
djyk777
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1
Hangul = Korean script
djyk777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 12:05 PM   #7
heffeque
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Salamanca, Spain, Europe.
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by ltcommander.data View Post
Hopefully there are some nice graphics driver improvements in 10.5.6 as hinted at in the recent Torque Game Engine Advanced for Mac Beta system requirements:

http://www.garagegames.com/blogs/985/15671


Hopefully these bug fixes translate into performance gains.
I guess that new graphics drivers are coming. I'd specially love the QuickTime hardware acceleration that 9400 have but on my 8600.
heffeque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 12:35 PM   #8
MacTel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 634
Quote:
Originally Posted by iijuanii View Post
so....
What are we gonna see at macworld in January?

I was gonna buy the new macbook the day it came out, but after seeing the prices/specs, soon came to the conclusion that the white macbook is getting scrapped, and the current models are being priced down in January.

but most importantly, i'm thinking there will be some new software upgrade in January.
i'm hoping
Most likely a new Mac Mini and iMac.

The Mac Pro and xServe could use some polish and might see an upgrades at MacWorld.

Software-wise don't expect much. iLife and iWork will come out with new version with Snow Leopard in June. MobileMe might get some slight tweaks and additions.

MacWorld looks like it will be a ho-hum deal. No new iPhones or iPods are expected, but maybe a new release of the iPhone OS.

AppleTV might see its third remaking. Unless Apple buys El Gato and incorporates PVR that will be another so-so announcement. If Apple merges the AppleTV and Mac Mini foregoing the optical drive that would be something.


Tory Hagen
Break the Wedge!
MacTel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 12:41 PM   #9
solipsism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacTel View Post
AppleTV might see its third remaking. Unless Apple buys El Gato and incorporates PVR that will be another so-so announcement. If Apple merges the AppleTV and Mac Mini foregoing the optical drive that would be something.
As nice as that would be, it would compete directly with the iTS and piss off every single network. I do think we'll eventually see an El Gato USB solution but only through an XMBC/Boxee-type hack.

PS: Does anyone have any ideas how the Mac Pro could be altered?


Do your part to clean up AppleInsider forums: User CP » Edit Ignore List » Teckstud
solipsism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 12:41 PM   #10
wobegon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 754
Quote:
Originally Posted by hittrj01 View Post
Refreshed iMacs, Mac Pros, and (hopefully) Mac Minis.
I had originally thought they'd refresh those in the weeks leading up to Christmas, but with Macworld being pretty early this year (starts the 5th) and Apple confirming their product line is "set", I guess they will be part of the show, albeit a pretty small part (unless they redesign the Mac mini, iMac, and/or Mac Pro).

Quote:
Originally Posted by hittrj01 View Post
Possibly definite, concrete news and demos of Snow Leopard.
I'm guessing (and hoping) a Snow Leopard demo will be one of the major highlights of the show. I remember when they demoed Leopard at WWDC and then showed what it really looked like - translucent Menu Bar, 3D Dock, unified window borders, etc. - at Macworld the following January (if my chronology is correct). The chances of this happening again are high, but the differences in Leopard and Snow Leopard will be more subtle. I just want to hear Jobs say "oh and one more thing...NO MORE AQUA."

Quote:
Originally Posted by hittrj01 View Post
Also, I wouldn't be surprised to see a new version of iLife and/or iWork, maybe Aperture or Final Cut (probably not, though)
Very likely. I personally wonder if they'll finally stop dating their iLife and iWork suites with '07, '08, etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hittrj01 View Post
and please (PLEASE, Apple) iPhone push notification that was promised for September!!
Yes! And don't forget about MobileMe's still absent iDisk link-to-attachment feature.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hittrj01 View Post
As far as the white MacBook getting axed, I tend to agree with you, but I highly doubt they will drop the prices of the current aluminum models.
Or maybe we'll see a more revised Air instead, with a glass, black-bordered display, glass, buttonless trackpad, and perhaps the rumored partial carbon fiber body. The slightly revised ones released a few weeks ago are nice, but they feel like a stopgap measure. Plus, they're not nearly as compelling as they once were now that the MacBook is aluminum, less than an inch thick, and only a pound and a half heavier than the Air.


Last edited by wobegon; 11-16-2008 at 12:51 PM..
wobegon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 02:23 PM   #11
iijuanii
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by hittrj01 View Post
Refreshed iMacs, Mac Pros, and (hopefully) Mac Minis. Possibly definite, concrete news and demos of Snow Leopard. Also, I wouldn't be surprised to see a new version of iLife and/or iWork, maybe Aperture or Final Cut (probably not, though), and please (PLEASE, Apple) iPhone push notification that was promised for September!!

As far as the white MacBook getting axed, I tend to agree with you, but I highly doubt they will drop the prices of the current aluminum models. They will probably replace the white MacBook with an aluminum model with the same specs (sans FireWire, of course ) and keep it at $999, or possibly bump it back up to $1099. Keeping the white MacBook had all the signs of an end-of-life inventory dump, and it just doesn't mesh with the rest of the Mac line (aluminum, glass, etc.)
Well. If they drop the white MacBook my best bet is that they scrap the white one. But do you think they can still keep the mid level MacBook at 2.0ghz? or shift down the models.to where you're now paying 1099 for the current midlevel MacBook etc?
iijuanii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 02:25 PM   #12
solipsism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by iijuanii View Post
But do you think they can still keep the mid level MacBook at 2.0ghz? or shift down the models.to where you're now paying 1099 for the current midlevel MacBook etc?
I think the cost is too high and will be too high come January to remove the White MB from the lineup. I think we have another year before Apple can consider its removal. I have a feeling that it's probably selling pretty well at its new price-point.


Do your part to clean up AppleInsider forums: User CP » Edit Ignore List » Teckstud
solipsism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 02:36 PM   #13
asterion
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4
I'm hoping (praying) for a MacBook Pro option of a non-reflective screen.

Until then, I cannot seriously consider buying one.

A.
asterion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 03:22 PM   #14
Blah64
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by asterion View Post
I'm hoping (praying) for a MacBook Pro option of a non-reflective screen.

Until then, I cannot seriously consider buying one.

A.
I'm with you. Right now, for the first time in my 29 years of buying Apple computers, Apple doesn't make a machine I can use. Worst decision they've made in many years.

That said, I can't imagine they'll reverse that decision so quickly. I certainly hope that everyone that finds glossy unacceptable is making their case known to Apple so they can "fix" this terribly disappointing situation soon. There are a few polls out that show it's no tiny minority. Here's one:

http://www.macosxhints.com/polls/ind...8glossy&aid=-1

Note that this poll (with enough respondents to be believable) shows a roughly combined 44.5 % that dislike glossy, 39 % that like it, and 13.5 % that haven't decided. If you divide the "haven't decided" group proportionately, you get about 51.5% that prefer matte! Even if it's off by 10%, that's a huge chunk of disappointed users. And for what reason? Note that 30% (are at least stating that they) will not buy the machines because of it! What the hell is Apple thinking?!

Join me in changing your sig...


No Matte == No Sale :-(
Blah64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 03:23 PM   #15
Foo2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 594
Quote:
Originally Posted by asterion View Post
I'm hoping (praying) for a MacBook Pro option of a non-reflective screen.
I don't believe it will ever happen with the new design, because the black border around the display would probably look terrible with a matte finish, and it would raise the uncomfortable question of why a matte finish isn't an option for the MacBook and iMac, too. (Maybe even for the iPhone!) IMO the black border will have to go--replaced by aluminum perhaps--before Apple will offer a matte option.

Perhaps the redesigned 17" will differ enough from the 15" that a matte finish can still be offered without impacting the aesthetics. I've read of video editing professionals needing a matte finish display more than most users. The 17" MBP, which can display full 1080p resolution, seems likely in its redesign to support the new Intel mobile quad-core processors, and this would benefit video editors as well.


Last edited by Foo2; 11-16-2008 at 03:34 PM..
Foo2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 03:26 PM   #16
canucklehead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 121
I LOVE my new Macbook Pro. I find the screen thing a complete non-issue... I thought it might be a problem but find I actually never even think about it when I'm using my computer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by asterion View Post
I'm hoping (praying) for a MacBook Pro option of a non-reflective screen.

Until then, I cannot seriously consider buying one.

A.
canucklehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 03:30 PM   #17
JeffDM
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by iijuanii View Post
so....
What are we gonna see at macworld in January?

I was gonna buy the new macbook the day it came out, but after seeing the prices/specs, soon came to the conclusion that the white macbook is getting scrapped, and the current models are being priced down in January.

but most importantly, i'm thinking there will be some new software upgrade in January.
i'm hoping
Wow, it doesn't look like you even tried to stay on topic. You've derailed the thread on the second post.
JeffDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 04:03 PM   #18
rdhaag
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
Screen cover

Quote:
Originally Posted by asterion View Post
I'm hoping (praying) for a MacBook Pro option of a non-reflective screen.

Until then, I cannot seriously consider buying one.

A.

I think the company that makes the matte screen protectors for iPhone should make them for the MacBook line. Then those who dislike the new screens can buy them.
rdhaag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 04:41 PM   #19
melgross
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by hittrj01 View Post

As far as the white MacBook getting axed, I tend to agree with you, but I highly doubt they will drop the prices of the current aluminum models. They will probably replace the white MacBook with an aluminum model with the same specs (sans FireWire, of course ) and keep it at $999, or possibly bump it back up to $1099. Keeping the white MacBook had all the signs of an end-of-life inventory dump, and it just doesn't mesh with the rest of the Mac line (aluminum, glass, etc.)
The white MB was clearly released in deference to the looming recession here, the one that's already present in Europe, and coming around the rest of the world.

I don't know why they would pull it, unless they were able to quickly put something else together. Jobs has said that the aluminum cases do cost more to produce, though they would come down in time. I'm pretty sure they tried to figure out a way to make one less expensive, but I can't see a way right now.

But as Jeff says, this is off topic.
melgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 04:44 PM   #20
melgross
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffDM View Post
Wow, it doesn't look like you even tried to stay on topic. You've derailed the thread on the second post.
Heh! Honestly though Jeff, it IS a pretty boring topic by itself.
melgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 05:31 PM   #21
Tenchi211
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by hittrj01 View Post
Refreshed iMacs, Mac Pros, and (hopefully) Mac Minis. Possibly definite, concrete news and demos of Snow Leopard. Also, I wouldn't be surprised to see a new version of iLife and/or iWork, maybe Aperture or Final Cut (probably not, though), and please (PLEASE, Apple) iPhone push notification that was promised for September!!

As far as the white MacBook getting axed, I tend to agree with you, but I highly doubt they will drop the prices of the current aluminum models. They will probably replace the white MacBook with an aluminum model with the same specs (sans FireWire, of course ) and keep it at $999, or possibly bump it back up to $1099. Keeping the white MacBook had all the signs of an end-of-life inventory dump, and it just doesn't mesh with the rest of the Mac line (aluminum, glass, etc.)
If they do discontinue the white MacBook and go all aluminum with the line that would be great! But please...no more combo drives on the low end model. That just doesn't make any sense nowadays when super drives are so cheap, and with your lowest priced white MacBook containing a superdrive. I'll miss firewire, though I'll get over it.
Tenchi211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 06:10 PM   #22
Gucky
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6
I feel the same way about glossy screens. No way will I buy a laptop with a glossy screen. I hate those things! But, I have 4 GiB RAM in my 1st gen MacBook Pro, and a 320GB hard drive. I'm waiting for a MacBook Pro w/ 8GiB RAM. I also want a blu-ray reader or even better a blu-ray writer. If Apple won't make laptops with matte displays I will simply buy a different brand high-end model and install Ubuntu Linux on it. I'm a Unix geek/developer and apart from the great hardware it's the fact that OS X is Unix why I use it. I'm hoping for a 17" MacBook pro with a matte screen option even though I prefer the 15" models because I can still use them to watch movies on planes while it seems impossible to do that with a 17" model unless one sits in 1st class which is too expensive for me. Also 17" models are just a tad too big to lug around, in my opinion.
Gucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 06:39 PM   #23
gastroboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by canucklehead View Post
I LOVE my new Macbook Pro. I find the screen thing a complete non-issue... I thought it might be a problem but find I actually never even think about it when I'm using my computer.
I thought the absence of a screen would make a huge difference, but now find I never look up from my keyboard and have not missed it at all.

Although I have to now use a regular mirror for shaving.
gastroboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 06:42 PM   #24
gastroboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdhaag View Post
I think the company that makes the matte screen protectors for iPhone should make them for the MacBook line. Then those who dislike the new screens can buy them.
Wow there is always a "solution" for the problems that Apple creates, that gets recommended by someone who has never used it.

They are always of the class of hiding under the kitchen table in case of nuclear attack.
gastroboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 07:46 PM   #25
NTropy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7
Glad to hear about the DVI problem. Odd thing is, I was happily having no issue with 10.5.5 until just last weekend. I thought it was my monitor and ordered a new one before checking to see if it was a software problem. Now I have to deal with an RMA, a restocking charge and shipping due to my knee jerk reaction. Can you say D'OH!
NTropy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 08:10 PM   #26
xdaniel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 29
I wonder why the new unibodies are machined rather than cast... machining is typically a fair bit more expensive, no?

Quote:
Originally Posted by melgross View Post
The white MB was clearly released in deference to the looming recession here, the one that's already present in Europe, and coming around the rest of the world.

I don't know why they would pull it, unless they were able to quickly put something else together. Jobs has said that the aluminum cases do cost more to produce, though they would come down in time. I'm pretty sure they tried to figure out a way to make one less expensive, but I can't see a way right now.

But as Jeff says, this is off topic.
xdaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 11:37 PM   #27
bloggerblog
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 570
Machining is more expensive, but when you factor in all the small bits and pieces that are required with the traditional process plus the considerably more complex assembly costs, apparently in the end it all pays off.


bloggerblog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2008, 11:56 PM   #28
solipsism
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloggerblog View Post
Machining is more expensive, but when you factor in all the small bits and pieces that are required with the traditional process plus the considerably more complex assembly costs, apparently in the end it all pays off.
You have a point, but I'd say we can assume more aspects of the process potentially saving money in the long term. For example, if the structure is more sound it may require less repairs and replacements under warranty, as well as a reduction in lawsuits. Also, design changing can presumably be made faster, cheaper and with more precision than having to retrain as many people (if at all) if a slight alterations are needed.


Do your part to clean up AppleInsider forums: User CP » Edit Ignore List » Teckstud
solipsism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 12:16 AM   #29
melgross
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by xdaniel View Post
I wonder why the new unibodies are machined rather than cast... machining is typically a fair bit more expensive, no?
We had a very big debate about this.

Machining gives better rigidity, as well as a process that can be modified very rapidly, which either stamping or casting can't do. It also gives higher reliability, as there are fewer parts to be made and installed.

Apple does say the price will come down over time.
melgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 12:25 AM   #30
hittrj01
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by melgross View Post
The white MB was clearly released in deference to the looming recession here, the one that's already present in Europe, and coming around the rest of the world.

I don't know why they would pull it, unless they were able to quickly put something else together. Jobs has said that the aluminum cases do cost more to produce, though they would come down in time. I'm pretty sure they tried to figure out a way to make one less expensive, but I can't see a way right now.

But as Jeff says, this is off topic.
I do understand it's off-topic, but it's a little hard to keep a thread going about a x.x.1 update, even if there are some pretty intriguing features coming.

Now, getting back off-topic (), looking at numbers, the recession does not seem to be hurting Apple as badly as people predicted. Also, being a manager at a Best Buy that sells Apple computers, the number of sales of the aluminum MacBooks are typically about 2-3 times more than our white MacBook, even though it's $300 more. People see the added value of the updated computers and are willing to spend more money on a computer that isn't using technology from 2 years ago (Intel graphics, anyone?).

You're right, they may not axe the white MacBook at Macworld, but I'm guessing it will be relatively soon, and I think even raising the base price back up to $1099 would be justifiable, especially if they switch it to aluminum.
hittrj01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 01:08 AM   #31
melgross
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 19,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by hittrj01 View Post
I do understand it's off-topic, but it's a little hard to keep a thread going about a x.x.1 update, even if there are some pretty intriguing features coming.

Now, getting back off-topic (), looking at numbers, the recession does not seem to be hurting Apple as badly as people predicted. Also, being a manager at a Best Buy that sells Apple computers, the number of sales of the aluminum MacBooks are typically about 2-3 times more than our white MacBook, even though it's $300 more. People see the added value of the updated computers and are willing to spend more money on a computer that isn't using technology from 2 years ago (Intel graphics, anyone?).

You're right, they may not axe the white MacBook at Macworld, but I'm guessing it will be relatively soon, and I think even raising the base price back up to $1099 would be justifiable, especially if they switch it to aluminum.
We do know that Apple's sales dropped a good bit the last three weeks of the last quarter. Reports are out that state Apple is cutting production on many of their lines. I expect that.

When Jobs was asked how they expected to get through the recession, he didn't say that they felt their sales would be at expected levels, he said that they would spend more on R&D, and so would be at a better position than their competitors when the recession was over.
melgross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 01:36 AM   #32
GregoriusM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 135
Another off-topic:

When they update iWork, why would they not include Bento 2 as part of it, to more directly compete with Office?
GregoriusM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 01:54 AM   #33
PG4G
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 333
Bento 2 is not owned by Apple. They aren't allowed to.

Besides, Bento 2 is just another take on all the apps already on a mac. There's no point doubling up.
PG4G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 04:19 AM   #34
kaiwai
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregoriusM View Post
Another off-topic:

When they update iWork, why would they not include Bento 2 as part of it, to more directly compete with Office?
*shrugs* How many end users will actually use a database? I'd say there are very few in the market whom Apple targets with their consumer iWorks line.

With that being said, I hope they really improve Pages and Numbers - I'd love to see it finally be a drop in replacement for Microsoft Office 2008 given the crap quality of the Office suite so far.
kaiwai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 08:05 AM   #35
JeffDM
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .US
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by PG4G View Post
Bento 2 is not owned by Apple. They aren't allowed to.

Besides, Bento 2 is just another take on all the apps already on a mac. There's no point doubling up.
?

Please clarify.

Bento 2 is made by FileMaker, Inc. (from their site)

From same site:

Ownership: FileMaker, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL).

So I'd say that Apple owns Bento 2. This business of they aren't allowed to is news to me, I don't get why that would be.
JeffDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 08:38 AM   #36
ascii
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 791
*bang*

I don't suppose they finally put the Application Firewall out of it's misery?
ascii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 08:52 AM   #37
perrin21
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5
Itablet?

Taking this further off topic, Whatever happened to the Itablet? I thought there were rumors of this being due January 09 time. Am i the only one waiting for this lol?
perrin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 09:35 AM   #38
Lafe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by djyk777 View Post
Hangul = Korean script
Odd that for Chinese the author used the name of the language, and for
Korean the author used the name of the script. It's like saying "Kanji"
when you mean "Japanese" or "Cyrillic" when you mean "Russian", but
saying Korean in the same sentence.


Journalism is publishing what someone doesn't want us to know; the rest is propaganda.
-Horacio Verbitsky (el perro), journalist (b. 1942)
Lafe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 10:44 AM   #39
PG4G
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 333
Sorry Jeff, i didn't realise that Filemaker was owned by Apple, thats all.
PG4G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 11:57 AM   #40
mycatsnameis
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 66
What about a fix for teh wireless connectivity problems plaguing MB and MBP owners (as well as the more recent iMacs apparently too)? Talk about something that impacts many users and is a major concern. Crazy how long they've let this slide for.


Registered Dec. 1898
mycatsnameis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.