|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Kasper's Automated Slave
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,151
|
Apple now taking orders for 24-inch LED Cinema Display
Following a month-long wait, Apple on Tuesday finally began taking orders for its new 24-inch LED-backlit Cinema Display through its online store, saying shipments will begin sometime later this month.
Announced last month, the new offering is designed especially for the new Unibody MacBook and MacBook Pro families, and includes an integrated MagSafe charger, three USB 2.0 ports and the new Mini DisplayPort, making it easy for users to quickly connect and power their notebooks as well as use their favorite peripherals. The 24-inch glossy, widescreen display features a 1920 x 1200 pixel resolution and uses LED-backlit technology to provide instant full-screen brightness and great power efficiency. It's suspended by an aluminum stand with an adjustable hinge that makes tilting the display easy, and includes a built-in iSight video camera, mic and speakers for video conferencing with iChat, listening to music or watching movies. The three self-powered USB 2.0 ports allow you to leave your printer, camera, iPhone 3G or iPod dock connected when you take your MacBook with you. The thin display also includes a built-in universal MagSafe charger so you can leave your notebook's MagSafe power adapter in your travel bag. Apple says the new LED Cinema Display is the greenest display it's ever developed, made with mercury-free LED technology, arsenic-free glass and highly recyclable materials. It meets stringent Energy Star 4.0 requirements and achieves EPEAT Gold status, the company said. The new display contains no brominated flame retardants, and all internal cables and components are PVC-free. Its foam packaging has also been reduced by 44 percent. It sells for a suggested retail price of $899 and requires a MacBook, MacBook Air or MacBook Pro with the new Mini DisplayPort. However, our sponsor MacMall is also taking pre-orders at the reduced cost of $879. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11
|
gorgeous, but way too expensive
A 20" flat panel from Dell : $180 for the cheap one, $260 for the ultrasharp
A 20" cinema display from Apple : $600 for the cheap one, 900$ for the LED one comon apple, you can charge some premium for being a cute, but the DOUBLE price ? and please : don't come telling me that Dell monitors are inferior, because they are not. I'm writing this on my MacPro, attached to dual monitor 24" ultrasharp and a 20" ultrasharp.... total price : 800$, which is cheaper than the LED from apple, for more than the double screen estate. And the image quality on both is simply stunning. My boss (a true mac fanatic) has the Apple cinema 30", and the display quality is in no way better than my Dell monitor. when it comes to the computer itself, I gladly pay the premium. Even more : I'm PROUD on paying 20%-50% more for a desktop machine that looks good and works better. But for the displays, I can't bring myself to it. I'd look like a moron behind a $1600 dual 20" monitor. I don't know what they are smoking, but apple should get its act together on the monitor price front. It is just ridiculous. Strangely enough, the price difference is percentually LESS on the 30" screens : $1800 for the apple one, $1400 for the cheapest 30" Dell... PS : yea, I registered an appleinsider account to vent my frustrations ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 21
|
You might be lucky with your Dell monitor. Not all ship with a Super IPS Panel. Dell use whatever panels they can get their hands on from the parts bin so its the luck of the draw with what you get. I've seen many many Dell screens side by side outputting different colours, even after calibration. Shocking really.
I do agree though, Apple's displays are too much. Despite the quality, I shudder when I look at the price tag.
My Apple Blog: www.AppleObserver.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
of course, this is seriously balanced by the awfulness of their computers... the recent generation is slightly better, but the previous desktops (1 year old) are failing by the dozens overhere... could be VISTA too though... so glad to be on my little mac island :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5
|
Their prices are close to insane! They have the looks, the performance and the build quality but come on... it simply does not justify the price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1
|
Are you really comparing 24" LED, S-IPS panels to Dell 20" (lesser-panel) displays? geeze. Compare among these monitors with IPS panels:
<http://www.pchardwarehelp.com/guides/s-ips-lcd-list.php> Add to the fact that the $900 24" Apple display has an LED backlight, which most of the other 24" monitors on that list don't have. One that does is the $2200 Samsung XL24, but that's also a more versatile, pro-oriented monitor. Anyway, compare apples to apples, and Apple's monitor is priced pretty competitively. If you want to complain about something, complain about the fact that the monitor seems to be exclusively tied to Mini DisplayPort. If they had reverse adaptors or interchangeable display cable assemblies (even sold separately) for DVI, HDMI, etc., I'd be thrilled. Oh well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 11
|
Compatible with other Macs?
Does anyone know of an adaptor that will allow this screen to work with my Mac Pro? I don't mind paying $900 for a great display. But it seems counter-intuitive to charge pro-level prices without a way to make it work with their high-end systems.
(I'm the king of hyphens this morning!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 65
|
no external speaker jack
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,010
|
How would you use two of these with one Macbook? Two of these with any Apple product for that matter?
:-D * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11
|
my bad... Still leaves a $900 vs $400 price difference, although you can't compare the LED to the ultrasharp technology wise. But if you take the NON-LED 20" cinema display, and compare that to the $260 ultrasharp... |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
but lets forget about the LED 24" for a second, and look at the ordinary 20" mac, which goes for $599. Can you claim this price just, compared to the $260 20" dell ultrasharp, which is (i repeat myself) a really really good monitor, quality-wise ? Even the 24" ultrasharp dell is cheaper, and of stunning image quality too. Honestly : me and my boss did a comparision by putting the 30" cinema next to my 24" dell, and they were equally vibrant, bright & crisp. to top it off : if you buy a man $599 mini, you can NOT buy an apple monitor cheaper than your brand new computer. How ridiculous is that ? Last edited by jawadde; 11-18-2008 at 10:39 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 594
|
Nothing's changed here. Before the new laptops and display, you couldn't use two external displays either. (First people complain [naively] about the price, then they complain that they can't use two).
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 594
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
FWIW, I saw one at an Apple store and damn, it is one sexy looking display. Would make a nice companion to my new MBP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
Resumee: expensive, nice design, good for Macbook usage, but lacking all features neccessary for serious work. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,273
|
PR says that the 24" ACD is geared for the MacBooks; however, it seems neither the monitor nor the MacBooks come with a connecting cable which is an additional $29. Isn't that adding insult to injury?
ADS
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,010
|
Quote:
Its their new business model, nickel and dime. It just works!
:-D * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tiraspol, Pridnestrovie
Posts: 491
|
I would pay twice that if the resolution were 2560x1600 and the monitor were still 24".
Mac user since August 1983.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 5,249
|
I just looked. As far as I can see the connecting cable comes with the monitor. Where do you see it for $29.
Last edited by TenoBell; 11-18-2008 at 11:44 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,778
|
That doesn't make sense. Everyone needs a power cord, but including adapters for every display connection type is not very Green and is a waste of money for the consumer. Why should I be charged more for adapters that ill never use?
Do your part to clean up AppleInsider forums: User CP » Edit Ignore List » Teckstud
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,778
|
for a higher-end consumer display, I would think that we need RI before that becomes feasible.
Do your part to clean up AppleInsider forums: User CP » Edit Ignore List » Teckstud
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 5,249
|
Interseting how people continuously compare Apple product to others that are either not the same or does accomplish the same task. To say it's better or cheaper but completely miss the point of the Apple product.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,273
|
Quote:
What's in the Box: LED Cinema Display AC power cord Cleaning cloth Printed documentation No mention of DisplayPort cables
ADS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Ansible
Posts: 11,778
|
They only list the seperate items. The DP, USB, MagSafe power cable combo is attached to the monitor.
Do your part to clean up AppleInsider forums: User CP » Edit Ignore List » Teckstud
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Some people (including me) are actually looking for older models Ultrasharp. The current line is no better than their E-series. The only difference is the additional ports. The only exception is the 30" Ultrasharp, which still uses S-IPS panel. That's the one I want to get (before they change to TN, like the rest of the line). By the way, I have three Ultrasharp's - a 18", 20" 4x3, and a 20" wide. All were bought at $400 to $500 range. All well worth the price. I have changed many computers, but the monitors stay. A good quality monitor is well worth the price. And no, I don't mind the monitor costing more than the computer itself. I would rather pay $500 for the 20" S-IPS Ultrasharp (older model) than $200 for the TN (current model) ones. By the way, the difference between panels is well discussed among PC users. I am a little surprised that it seems PC users know more/care more about quality than some Mac users. Last edited by johnqh; 11-18-2008 at 12:31 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,273
|
Quote:
This is where I saw the $29 cable. My error. It evidently refers to using a third party monitor: http://bitguru.wordpress.com/2008/10...i-displayport/ The downside? Mini-DisplayPort is presumably signal-compatible with standard DisplayPort, which “is the future” but hasn’t really caught on yet. This will likely be a win in the long term, but it’s not signal-compatible with DVI or HMDI (nor VGA, for that matter). DisplayPort implementations are permitted to pass DVI-compatible signals through the connector, and presumably this is what Apple has done, at least for single-link DVI. Apple’s $29 Mini DisplayPort to DVI Adapter supports single-link DVI. To exceed 1920×1200 requires the Mini DisplayPort to Dual-Link DVI Adapter, priced at a whopping $99. Presumably the dual-link adapter has circuitry that actually converts the DisplayPort signals, which is why it requires USB power. (There is also a $29 Mini DisplayPort to VGA Adapter.)
ADS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 147
|
Already got my order in for 2
_______________ ![]()
iPhone, iPod
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2
|
All these comparisons are not relevant. None of the suggested alternatives quoted in this thread have mini displayport connections (unique to Apple?) and that for oh so many Apple owners (i.e. those without Mac Book Pros) is important. I have a Mac Pro I cannot use the 24" LED monitor because of this. If anyone says that there will be new Mac Pros with revised Video output or there will a new graphics card has totally missed the point. Why should I have to buy a new Mac Pro or a new graphics card (I have the x1900XT card) what does all that add to the cost of the monitor? Also if an adaptor was possible surely Apple would have offered one from the launch date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 5,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2
|
Over priced iPod charger
And if your going to connect it to a Macbook pro what does it matter if it has a isight camera ? that would mean you have two ..
And aren't the rest of the apple monitor lineup really just Samsung inside? I can get a 24 inch Samsung @ Costco that is also a T.V. for 399.oo THAT's HALF PRICE Samsung 24" LCD HDTV Monitor Touch of Color Series Resolution: 1920 x 1200 Contrast: 1000:1 Brightness: 300 cd/m2 AND it has Inputs/Outputs: HDMI x 2 Component x 1 DVI x 1 D-sub (15) RGB x 1 Optical Digital Sound Out (SPDIF) so I can watch Blue Ray ...later if I want.. WITHOUT having to buy an adaptor .. what are the downsides of this... half-price .. ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,273
|
Don't be so quick to pounce. You didn't read post #29.
ADS
Last edited by sequitur; 11-18-2008 at 01:00 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 594
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 29
|
Oh, I don't know... important things like the quality of the panel? Apple's monitors are reasonably priced compared to other monitors using the S-IPS panels. Whether that's worth the price difference is for you to decide. For me it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
....not a good argument give me some real facts that make this Apple monitor TWICE as better than a Samsung 'cheapie' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 594
|
More precisely than "in Germany," where does one find that kind of price for that Eizo? For a similar model, I see almost $1400 in the U.S. at a discount house. The Apple price is retail and, since it's new on the market, the Apple will be difficult to find discounted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 115
|
the blindness of the fanboys will always haunt these boards...
it's just plain impossible to reason with them logically. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|