|
|||||||
| Register | Members List | New Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Kasper's Automated Slave
Join Date: Nov 1997
Posts: 6,151
|
More versatile Mac mini expected at Macworld
A much anticipated update to Apple's tiny Mac mini desktop computer is believed to be a lock for next week's Macworld Expo, according to some last minute reports.
TUAW is citing its own sources who say the new models will sport a revised enclosure that more closely conforms to materials used throughout the better part of Apple's product line, namely aluminum and black plastic. Legacy Mac minis have employed a mixture of grey and white plastic. The report also corroborate some details published by AppleInsider in October regarding a move towards SATA optical drives and hard drives. It was reported that this change would be accompanied by build-to-order options that will allow customers to swap out the optical drive for a second hard drive -- a move that will cater those who intent to use the systems as mini servers. Other expected changes have included a move towards NVIDIA chipsets, the addition of a Mini DisplayPort, and the ability of the diminutive desktops to address 4GB of RAM, up from the 2GB maximum of today's models. For what it's worth, AppleInsider has also received a couple of reliable reports in recent weeks that suggest the long-awaited Mac mini makeover is slated to arrive at next week's trade show. We've been following the Mac mini story for some time. Earlier reports on the matter can be reviewed below: Eating our words: Apple's Mac mini to rock on Apple Enterprise sending thousands of Macs into hotels, cruise ships Informed players say Apple's Mac mini still kickin' Apple tells Mac mini fan to hang in there Mac mini makeover considered likely for Macworld New iMacs and Mac minis confirmed to use NVIDIA chipsets |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 492
|
I'm going to wager that Apple won't announce anything at this expo. Perhaps some simple upgrades to existing lines if anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 28
|
Why not just make a little bigger for a real HD... A second HD and the optical drive... $2700+ is too much for such a configuration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 424
|
As much as I think it makes sense to go with a 3.5" HDD and the slightly larger aTV / TimeCapsule footprint, the option of configuring for two HDDs suggests that they are going to stay with laptop 2.5" drives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 551
|
Quote:
![]()
Website: MacXpress
2.66 GHz Quadcore MacPro (Nehalem) 24" LED Apple Cinema Display 2.4 GHz 24" Aluminum iMac (Rev A) 867 MHz PowerMac G4 (Quicksilver) w/17" Apple Studio LCD 16GB iPhone 3G(S) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,055
|
I've been waiting for this for a long time. I will be buying one strictly for my tv. I will be shutting off my DirectTV (they should go into the business of knocking over banks), and getting a BLACK (HELL YAH) mac mini to match my entertainment center. I'm stoked and can't wait. Now all they need is blu-ray compatibility in them to make them a bitching entertainment center piece.
We all want things we can't have... So go to http://www.stuffspace.com!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 369
|
Actually they have to move it up. The chips used to produce it are not in full production anymore. It's a good move though as the enterprise market just began the "Love" of the mini as of this year. I can take a monster dell desktop, swap out a MacMini it's place and convert the old into a parallels virtual machine. They use 1/6th the power have twice the performance and the added security of OS X and productivity applications. It's a win/win for business's to switch to the MacMini. It's also, even in it's current form, cheaper than an equivalent low-power/high performance desktop. For the same price from Dell you get a dual core celeron, 1gb ram and a 160bg HD that consumes more than 120 watts. The intel mini's even under a good load only suck up about 50-65 watts (using a kill-o-watt meter to test).
Pro's of a virtual machine with NAT ethernet: startup/shutdown is about 5 seconds each way. Better Virus handling. Quicker interaction between Apple Mail/Downloads and windows desktop. Con's : Uses more than half of the 2gb of ram depending on configuration. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,055
|
I have a feeling a lot of these updates will be released a few days before the keynote. They pulled that crap with the mac pro last time. Moving to nehalem, they should talk about it this year. We'll see.
We all want things we can't have... So go to http://www.stuffspace.com!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 372
|
Great, as far as it has Firewire 800 ports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 22
|
Good news for us, as long as there's a decent bump in CPU.
These little guys would become just right for low-usage stations that just need internet and a bit of word processing. Everyone's happy. They fit in our counters, CFO likes the price, employees are digging on cool OS X, and us in IT are enjoying the non-Windows and non-anti-virus. I was getting worried the passed year that the minis would be abandoned just as they started being viable for us. We'd have been forced to move to Shuttle-X and Ubuntu. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Somewhere far, far away
Posts: 2,858
|
Quote:
It would be hard for Apple to justify making the Mac mini bulkier to allow putting a desktop size HDD that is rapidly becoming obsolete. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 849
|
I'd also guess that they'd stick wtih 2.5" drives (but I also think they'd be able to get a 3.5" drive in the current footprint by making it a little taller). In any event, 2.5" drives are readily available in 500 GB capacities. The current 160 GB limit is pathetic. 500 GB might not be sufficient for server use, but would be fine for normal desktop use. I'd also like to see an option for a 7200 rpm drive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: la Jolla
Posts: 768
|
Quote:
I think the iMac and the MacMini might be update right before and possibly the MacPro too if there isn't any case redesign. Same for displays. Phil will probably focus on the MacMini only if it is indeed a new redesigned product, snow leopard and iLife and iWork apps. Maybe that's all we'll see.
MacPro Octo 2.8
30" & 23" Apple Cinema HD Displays PowerBook G4 550, MacBook Pro 2.2 Ipod 1G, Shuffle 2G, iPhone 3G |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 457
|
I gotcha firewire. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 551
|
Quote:
If the MacMini is truly going to be updated I would think they'd spend a little more time on it. That is unless they want to do a keynote filler and explain how they redesigned the iMac's insides, or something.
Website: MacXpress
2.66 GHz Quadcore MacPro (Nehalem) 24" LED Apple Cinema Display 2.4 GHz 24" Aluminum iMac (Rev A) 867 MHz PowerMac G4 (Quicksilver) w/17" Apple Studio LCD 16GB iPhone 3G(S) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 634
|
Give me the new enclosure, 2Gb RAM, NVIDIA chipset, displayport, and a trackpad on top like the ones on the new Macbooks all for $499 and I'll buy one immediately. Even though I wasn't planning to.
![]()
Tory Hagen
Break the Wedge! |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 457
|
eSATA please.
Last edited by 8CoreWhore; 12-31-2008 at 12:52 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 330
|
I would love to see it support 3.5" HDDs but my credit card is already twitching regardless.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The West
Posts: 306
|
How about bringing together the Mini, AppleTV, TimeCapsule and AirportExtreme into a single footprint design and all running OSX? Then make them configurable by adding layers.
Basic unit is an Airport Extreme. Add a HDD layer and it's a TimeCapsule. Or add an NVIDIA layer and it's an AppleTV. Or two HDD layers and it's a mini server. Or an optical drive. Add an HDD plus NVIDIA and it's a media server. It's the tower that many have asked for. Gives lots of configurations based around a common set of hardware components and opens up the format for users to invent their own ideas based around a common OS. Really cool second-hand 'layer' market. Easy upgrades of any layer. Snaps together like Lego - it just works. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Paradise
Posts: 399
|
Yeah... that bundle would make a mini an impulse buy. Do hope they push the price below $500 again!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 8,557
|
That's a losing bet for you, I'll bet against that one - $100
Collecting my SSD iMac Fry-die. :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 8
|
What about new Mac Pros???!!!! Why are the pro consumers being ignored so?? I need a new machine but not until it gets a rev!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 551
|
Quote:
Unless there is a reason to show it at a keynote (like a total redesign)...the MacPro could easily be updated behind the scenes or say this coming Monday (before the keynote)
Website: MacXpress
2.66 GHz Quadcore MacPro (Nehalem) 24" LED Apple Cinema Display 2.4 GHz 24" Aluminum iMac (Rev A) 867 MHz PowerMac G4 (Quicksilver) w/17" Apple Studio LCD 16GB iPhone 3G(S) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 849
|
I did a quick Google search and didn't find a clear answer, but can you daisy-chain eSATA drives? If not, I view it as very limited. Short of getting a single-box RAID solution (which some of us might have a use for), I don't believe there are any hard drives capable of making use of all that extra bandwidth. I'm not even sure if today's hard drives are capable of saturating a FW800 connection (??). And I'm even less sure about this, but isn't SATA strictly a hard drive port whereas FW is used for many different types of peripherals?
Is the percentage of the mini's target audience who would set up a RAID sufficient to include eSATA? |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 10,457
|
Screw the 3.5 drive.
If you don't have plans to move to SSD in the next couple of years you're just throwing performance out the window as far as storage is concerned. Silver and black will certainly look good along with other stereo components. I'm waiting to see if FW and the mini have a future together. I'm not holding my breath. I will be glad to see Mini-DisplayPort 4GB of RAM is fantastic. I'll gladly re-purpose my Core Duo 1.66 and enjoy the faster CPU, GPU and more RAM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 551
|
Quote:
Website: MacXpress
2.66 GHz Quadcore MacPro (Nehalem) 24" LED Apple Cinema Display 2.4 GHz 24" Aluminum iMac (Rev A) 867 MHz PowerMac G4 (Quicksilver) w/17" Apple Studio LCD 16GB iPhone 3G(S) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,481
|
How does that suggest such?
Quote:
I'd actually like to see them move to 3.5" drives myself but have no evidence one way or the other. The only thing that the new case hints at right now is that well it is new. Now what I really want to see in a new case isn't so much aluminum but servicesbilty. A Mini designed for easy service would be the best possible update. As it is I'm not sure I need YAC ( yet another computer ). Unless that YAC is a tablet Touch2/Newton2 for those that need another computer this sounds like it will be a very nice machine. I do hope that the majority of the rumors are true, it will be nice work on Apples part. Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,481
|
FireWire?
I think it will be there in FW800 form with an outside chance of FW3200. With the laptop I could see the rational for the drop. On the Mini it is a different story and the breadth of the user base would still require it. Also a desk top can easily handle the power budget.
Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 379
|
Where's the link to the AI story that declared that the Mac Mini is absolutely dead?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2
|
Scared about the Mini Display
I thought i had read an article a little while back that the mini display port would keep you from displaying iTunes content on your TV. If this is the case that would be a major drawback from the new mini.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,850
|
Quote:
![]()
The evil that we fight is but the shadow of the evil that we do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 849
|
Quote:
Theoretically, once you have a mDP-to-HDMI cable and connect it to a HDCP-compliant TV (pretty much all HDTV, I suspect), the mini/MB/MBP should be able to handshake with the TV and allow the video to display. I'm assuming the creators of the DisplayPort spec weren't stupid enough to create a DRM scheme that was incompatible with HDCP! That said, until Apple or some other definitive source says it will work, I'm with you! I'm hoping it will work and that it will bring HD movie rental to the Mac (not just the AppleTV). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,567
|
Quote:
![]()
I don't see how an anti M$ stance can be seen as a bad thing on an Apple forum I really can't!
nagromme - According to Amazon: "SpongBob Typing Tutor" is outselling Windows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,273
|
Quote:
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles..._mac_mini.html Eating our words: Apple's Mac mini to rock on http://www.appleinsider.com/articles...o_rock_on.html
ADS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,195
|
You will never see a 3.5" HD in a Mac mini. Let me repeat that. NEVER!
Quote:
A 2.5" HD measures 4" L by 2.75" W by 0.375" H Therefore, ~ six 2.5" HD occupy the same volume (and surprisingly weight) of one 3.5" drive. The 2.5" and 3.5" form factors refer to the platter dimension. The fastest part of the HD is adjacent to the spindle, thus a 5,400 RPM 2.5" drive will have better performance then a 7,200 RPM 3.5" drive over the last outer fractional inch difference between these two drives (theoretically speaking based on geometry alone)). A CD/DVD is ~ 4.75" in diameter A Half height DVD burner is 0.5" H So no, a 3.5" HD will not ever fit into the Mac mini, since the Mac mini doesn't include a full height CD/DVD drive. SSD and 2.5" HD's will eventually replace 3.5" HD IMHO, it may take several years though. As to the Mac mini, I can wish for eSATA (with PM) and HDMI, but I doubt either of these will happen. I'd actually rather see Socket P then Socket LGA 775, but if the LGA 775 are quad-core and first out of the gate and you can get the Mac Mini configured with one of these, then give me that instead. And as long as there is a cheap adapter for Apple's proprietary display connection so that I can drive an HDMI or DVI LCD I'll be in seventh heaven, as I'll never waste my good money on Apple's high margin displays, TYVM. I'd gladly take two 2.5" 500 GB HD's though, 7,200 RPM, with Apple's built in RAID 0/1 though. Or one 2.5" 500 GB 7,200 RPM drive with a 2.5" Intel SSD as the boot drive.Meh, to Firewire though, just give me plenty of USB 2.0 ports so that I can use one of then for an external DVD burner. Although a Firewire 400 port would not get me upset in the least. Last edited by franksargent; 12-31-2008 at 08:44 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 130
|
Quote:
I think the next MacWorld keynote will be yet another MacWorld keynote. No better, no worse. Just what it is--as well as being the last one. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|